Tchougui
asked on
Defrag exchange 2007, the other ways
Hi everyone,
I read that defragmentation on exchange 2007 was not a good idea and that the better way was to create a new maibox database and put all the mailbox in there.
Should a create a new storage group or i leave it in the first ?
I i understand, the steps are :
Create a new mailbox db.
Move all the mailbox in the db.
Delete the old mailbox db.
That's it ? No more configuration ? Exchange will automatically find the new mailbox ?
I read that defragmentation on exchange 2007 was not a good idea and that the better way was to create a new maibox database and put all the mailbox in there.
Should a create a new storage group or i leave it in the first ?
I i understand, the steps are :
Create a new mailbox db.
Move all the mailbox in the db.
Delete the old mailbox db.
That's it ? No more configuration ? Exchange will automatically find the new mailbox ?
Ref: https://www.experts-exchange.com/questions/23541121/Need-to-defrag-Exchange-Server-2007-database.html
ASKER
you didn't read my question, i don't want to do an offline defrag.
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
It is rcommended that you only have one database per storage group, and is a requirement if you sent up CCR / LCR or SCR.
I am not sure where you read it @ eseutil /d is not advisable on Exchange 2007 ?
Ms Technet Gives KB's on how to do it here
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa997972(EXCHG.80).aspx
It wont harm your EDB to run eseutil's.
It's much less complicated than trying to move mailbox / different storage group and then trying to mount.
Ms Technet Gives KB's on how to do it here
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa997972(EXCHG.80).aspx
It wont harm your EDB to run eseutil's.
It's much less complicated than trying to move mailbox / different storage group and then trying to mount.