Solved

Defrag exchange 2007, the other ways

Posted on 2010-08-21
5
513 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-10
Hi everyone,

I read that defragmentation on exchange 2007 was not a good idea and that the better way was to create a new maibox database and put all the mailbox in there.

Should a create a new storage group or i leave it in the first ?

I i understand, the steps are :

Create a new mailbox db.
Move all the mailbox in the db.
Delete the old mailbox db.

That's it ? No more configuration ? Exchange will automatically find the new mailbox ?
0
Comment
Question by:Tchougui
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
5 Comments
 
LVL 7

Expert Comment

by:jakirkhan
ID: 33493843
0
 

Author Comment

by:Tchougui
ID: 33493869
you didn't read my question, i don't want to do an offline defrag.
0
 
LVL 6

Accepted Solution

by:
Shack-Daddy earned 500 total points
ID: 33493953
The basic answer is yes, you should be able to do what you described, and the Outlook clients will find their mailboxes. If a user has Outlook open when you move the mailbox, they will be prompted to close and reopen Outlook.

I don't think it will matter if you create the mailbox database in a new storage group or the same one, as long as you delete the old database once everything has been moved.

Exchange 2007 already done an online defrag operation every day, but you seem to be referring to an offline defrag with the goal of saving space.

If your database is on a drive that is limited in space and you'd like to keep the database in good health, you could actually relocated your database to another drive temporarily (even an external drive) and then defrag the heck out of the original disk while the database is off of it. Then you can move the database back to the original drive and it would be written to a more contiguous area of the defragmented disk. But I'll add that you really don't want to be keeping your databases on disks that are short on space, since that naturally leads to more fragmentation and you are likely to have some problem when you inadvertently cause the store size to balloon.
0
 
LVL 6

Expert Comment

by:craig_j_Lawrence
ID: 33494272
It is rcommended that you only have one database per storage group, and is a requirement if you sent up CCR / LCR or SCR.
0
 
LVL 28

Expert Comment

by:sunnyc7
ID: 33501191
I am not sure where you read it @ eseutil /d is not advisable on Exchange 2007 ?
Ms Technet Gives KB's on how to do it here
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa997972(EXCHG.80).aspx

It wont harm your EDB to run eseutil's.
It's much less complicated than trying to move mailbox / different storage group and then trying to mount.
0

Featured Post

Free eBook: Backup on AWS

Everything you need to know about backup and disaster recovery with AWS, for FREE!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Marketers need statistics and metrics like everybody else needs oxygen. In this article we explain how to enable marketing campaign statistics for Microsoft Exchange mail.
Learn to move / copy / export exchange contacts to iPhone without using any software. Also see the issues in configuration of exchange with iPhone to migrate contacts.
To show how to generate a certificate request in Exchange 2013. We show this process by using the Exchange Admin Center. Log into Exchange Admin Center.:  First we need to log into the Exchange Admin Center. Navigate to the Servers >> Certificates…
This video discusses moving either the default database or any database to a new volume.

751 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question