Solved

Defrag exchange 2007, the other ways

Posted on 2010-08-21
5
509 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-10
Hi everyone,

I read that defragmentation on exchange 2007 was not a good idea and that the better way was to create a new maibox database and put all the mailbox in there.

Should a create a new storage group or i leave it in the first ?

I i understand, the steps are :

Create a new mailbox db.
Move all the mailbox in the db.
Delete the old mailbox db.

That's it ? No more configuration ? Exchange will automatically find the new mailbox ?
0
Comment
Question by:Tchougui
5 Comments
 
LVL 7

Expert Comment

by:jakirkhan
Comment Utility
0
 

Author Comment

by:Tchougui
Comment Utility
you didn't read my question, i don't want to do an offline defrag.
0
 
LVL 6

Accepted Solution

by:
Shack-Daddy earned 500 total points
Comment Utility
The basic answer is yes, you should be able to do what you described, and the Outlook clients will find their mailboxes. If a user has Outlook open when you move the mailbox, they will be prompted to close and reopen Outlook.

I don't think it will matter if you create the mailbox database in a new storage group or the same one, as long as you delete the old database once everything has been moved.

Exchange 2007 already done an online defrag operation every day, but you seem to be referring to an offline defrag with the goal of saving space.

If your database is on a drive that is limited in space and you'd like to keep the database in good health, you could actually relocated your database to another drive temporarily (even an external drive) and then defrag the heck out of the original disk while the database is off of it. Then you can move the database back to the original drive and it would be written to a more contiguous area of the defragmented disk. But I'll add that you really don't want to be keeping your databases on disks that are short on space, since that naturally leads to more fragmentation and you are likely to have some problem when you inadvertently cause the store size to balloon.
0
 
LVL 6

Expert Comment

by:craig_j_Lawrence
Comment Utility
It is rcommended that you only have one database per storage group, and is a requirement if you sent up CCR / LCR or SCR.
0
 
LVL 28

Expert Comment

by:sunnyc7
Comment Utility
I am not sure where you read it @ eseutil /d is not advisable on Exchange 2007 ?
Ms Technet Gives KB's on how to do it here
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa997972(EXCHG.80).aspx

It wont harm your EDB to run eseutil's.
It's much less complicated than trying to move mailbox / different storage group and then trying to mount.
0

Featured Post

How your wiki can always stay up-to-date

Quip doubles as a “living” wiki and a project management tool that evolves with your organization. As you finish projects in Quip, the work remains, easily accessible to all team members, new and old.
- Increase transparency
- Onboard new hires faster
- Access from mobile/offline

Join & Write a Comment

Resolve DNS query failed errors for Exchange
Disabling the Directory Sync Service Account in Office 365 will stop directory synchronization from working.
In this video we show how to create an Address List in Exchange 2013. We show this process by using the Exchange Admin Center. Log into Exchange Admin Center.: First we need to log into the Exchange Admin Center. Navigate to the Organization >> Ad…
The video tutorial explains the basics of the Exchange server Database Availability groups. The components of this video include: 1. Automatic Failover 2. Failover Clustering 3. Active Manager

744 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

10 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now