Solved

Error "Insufficient system memory" in SQL 2008

Posted on 2010-08-23
14
351 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-10
Getting the following error when opening a large view in SQL 2008.  Worked fine in 2000.  "There is insufficient system memory in resource pool 'internal' to run this query.".  Any ideas what would cause this and how to resolve?

Thanks!
0
Comment
Question by:greymattersolutions
  • 7
  • 5
  • 2
14 Comments
 
LVL 12

Expert Comment

by:mcv22
Comment Utility
Are you at the latest SP level for SQL server 2008?
0
 

Author Comment

by:greymattersolutions
Comment Utility
Probably not.  Is this a likely fix?  We'll apply latest sp.
0
 

Author Comment

by:greymattersolutions
Comment Utility
Applied the latest sp and still the same error.  Can open the view with TOP 50 but get the error above 100.
0
 
LVL 12

Expert Comment

by:mcv22
Comment Utility
0
 
LVL 75

Accepted Solution

by:
Anthony Perkins earned 250 total points
Comment Utility
>>Any ideas what would cause this and how to resolve?<<
I am going to go out on a limb and suggest your system does not have enough memory.
0
 

Author Comment

by:greymattersolutions
Comment Utility
Enough memory for what? To show 100 rows of a view?  Sql has 3.8 gb allocated.  It worked fine in sql 2000.  Is this a real suggestion or are you a hardware salesman :-)
0
 
LVL 75

Expert Comment

by:Anthony Perkins
Comment Utility
>>Sql has 3.8 gb allocated.<<
And what else is running on the server?  Is this 32-bit or 64-bit?  If it is 32-bit then there are some additional settings you may need to use in order to enable more memory.  
How are you executing the query?  I trust you are not going to say from Design mode.
Can you post the exact query you are using?
If you are running this on the server, have you tried disabling intellisense, so that you do not use so much memory?

>>It worked fine in sql 2000.<<
And I am sure it "worked fine" in SQL Server 7 and SQL Server 6.5 and .. .  What is your point?  Surely you are not considering going back to a discontinued and unsupported version?

>>Is this a real suggestion <<
Not at all.  I thought perhaps you were missing the obvious.
0
Complete Microsoft Windows PC® & Mac Backup

Backup and recovery solutions to protect all your PCs & Mac– on-premises or in remote locations. Acronis backs up entire PC or Mac with patented reliable disk imaging technology and you will be able to restore workstations to a new, dissimilar hardware in minutes.

 

Author Comment

by:greymattersolutions
Comment Utility
Wouldn't be the first time, but I don't think that's it in this case.  
Thanks!
0
 
LVL 75

Expert Comment

by:Anthony Perkins
Comment Utility
Fair enough.

Good luck.
0
 

Author Comment

by:greymattersolutions
Comment Utility
Found an inefficient cross join in a sub view.  Seems to have caused the problem.  Caused the view to return 400,000 rows.  Still not sure why it worked in SQL 2000 and not in 2008.  Are there major differences in how these versions handle memory?  Thanks!
0
 
LVL 75

Expert Comment

by:Anthony Perkins
Comment Utility
>>Are there major differences in how these versions handle memory?<<
Yes.  Even SQL Server 2005 was dramatically different.
0
 

Author Comment

by:greymattersolutions
Comment Utility
Been writing commercial enterprise systems on sql server since the early 90s.  Its never boring.

Thanks for making me go back through the code.  Still seems an odd regression in execution behavior. Have a good night!
0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:greymattersolutions
Comment Utility
Tough love
0
 
LVL 75

Expert Comment

by:Anthony Perkins
Comment Utility
>>Been writing commercial enterprise systems on sql server since the early 90s.<<
Than you are merely a spring chicken. :)

>>Still seems an odd regression in execution behavior. <<
Each new version of SQL Server brings with it added functionality and complexity, we cannot and should not expect something to work the same way now as it may have done with a version 10 years ago.  I will go one step further and state that there are not only queries that produce different output with SQL Server 2005/2008, but also some that do not even compile.  In all cases that I have seen that is due to a lousy query that should have been re-written in any case.
0

Featured Post

How your wiki can always stay up-to-date

Quip doubles as a “living” wiki and a project management tool that evolves with your organization. As you finish projects in Quip, the work remains, easily accessible to all team members, new and old.
- Increase transparency
- Onboard new hires faster
- Access from mobile/offline

Join & Write a Comment

If you have heard of RFC822 date formats, they can be quite a challenge in SQL Server. RFC822 is an Internet standard format for email message headers, including all dates within those headers. The RFC822 protocols are available in detail at:   ht…
This article explains how to reset the password of the sa account on a Microsoft SQL Server.  The steps in this article work in SQL 2005, 2008, 2008 R2, 2012, 2014 and 2016.
Viewers will learn how to use the SELECT statement in SQL to return specific rows and columns, with various degrees of sorting and limits in place.
Viewers will learn how to use the SELECT statement in SQL and will be exposed to the many uses the SELECT statement has.

763 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

14 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now