Checkpoint VPN through Iptables

Posted on 2010-08-23
Medium Priority
Last Modified: 2012-05-10
My company have a firewall Linux / iptables, managed by firewallbuilder.

There is a user in my company, that needs to access a another company using a VPN client (Check Point VPN-1 SecureClient NGX R60 HFA2). But I am not able to perform this configuration in firewallbuilder / iptables.

The another company IT, which has firewall checkpoint, said that I needed just allow udp 500 port to ther firewall and put the rule as stateful. I confirmed that all rules in firewallbuilder are stateful by default and even allow all ports from client to destination, the VPN client does not work.

How can I troubleshoot this problem?
Question by:strausswalter
  • 2
  • 2

Accepted Solution

jimmyray7 earned 2000 total points
ID: 33503902
Try also allowing UDP port 4500, which is sometimes used if a client is behind NAT.
LVL 33

Expert Comment

by:Dave Howe
ID: 33519914
I have a cp secureclient (r60, but r56 works too) behind a nat. the boxes to tick are office mode and both udp encapsulation boxes in the advanced settings properties page for the connection.

Author Comment

ID: 33521468
I am concluding that the problem is not about ports, I already allow all ports. The problem apparently, is NAT related. I sow that IPSec is not compatible with traditional NAT, I would have to enable NAT-T. I am researching how to setup this type of NAT in iptables.

Using a direct Internet link at client computer (without NAT), the VPN client run normally.

Author Comment

ID: 33585750
Problem solved.

With the help of the company that use this vpn client, I downloaded the VPN client and tried re-install the vpn client in another computer. Looking for the client IP in iptables logs (tail -f /var/log/messages | grep I could see a connect to another company firewall IP (201.x.x.x) at 4500 port. But in a secound connection the VPN client attempted to connect in a strange internal IP (10.1.x.x) at port 500.

The problem was that another company already owned the network, but they did not realize it. We assume, after these results, that after the first access the VPN client downloaded the another company network topology and the vpn client thought that it was in the company network and attempted to access a internal server.

We create a separate VLAN to this client, with another network address.

Now it is working properly.
LVL 33

Expert Comment

by:Dave Howe
ID: 33586747
no company owns 10.x.x.x - its an rfc1918 subnet :)

Featured Post

We Need Your Input!

WatchGuard is currently running a beta program for our new macOS Host Sensor for our Threat Detection and Response service. We're looking for more macOS users to help provide insight and feedback to help us make the product even better. Please sign up for our beta program today!

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

Join & Write a Comment

Join Greg Farro and Ethan Banks from Packet Pushers (http://packetpushers.net/podcast/podcasts/pq-show-93-smart-network-monitoring-paessler-sponsored/) and Greg Ross from Paessler (https://www.paessler.com/prtg) for a discussion about smart network …
This article will show you step-by-step instructions to build your own NTP CentOS server.  The network diagram shows the best practice to setup the NTP server farm for redundancy.  This article also serves as your NTP server documentation.
Learn how to find files with the shell using the find and locate commands. Use locate to find a needle in a haystack.: With locate, check if the file still exists.: Use find to get the actual location of the file.:
Connecting to an Amazon Linux EC2 Instance from Windows Using PuTTY.

623 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question