• Status: Solved
• Priority: Medium
• Security: Public
• Views: 322

# forces in a pulley

Hi

There is a diagram below taken from a video. The video says that because the cord is assumed to be massless and frictionless the 2 tension forces are equal in magnitude. I don't understand why they are the same.

I also don't understand the implication of the cord being massless. Does it have to be massless so you can ignore its weight?

thanks
pulley.jpg
0
andieje
• 7
• 5
1 Solution

Author Commented:
Does it mean that the tension force on the right of block 1 is the same as the tension force pulling up on block 2 because these are the same force but have had their direction changed by the pulley?
0

Author Commented:
Also, why is the acceleration the same for both blocks? And i don't understand why the formula chages from

Fx = m1.a1
Fy = Ft - m2.g = m2.a2

to Fy = -m2.a2 (note the minus sign)

p3.jpg
p1.jpg
0

Commented:
You said it was a video, so I assume the masses are moving.

You might set up an experiment like this to measure the coefficient of friction between the table and sliding mass.

If the cord is not massless, the tension in the cord increases with height/length.
You can hang a rope vertically with no load.  The free end of the cord has T=0.
But 100 feet of rope can wiegh 50 pounds.

Any friction in the pulley takes/subtracts tension from the horizontal cord.
You could clamp the rope between two block (very high friction) and support the entire load.
This would leave not tension in the horizontal run.
0

Author Commented:
Is it just because the accelerations have opposite directions? e.g. if box 1 was accelerating in the positive x direction then box 2 would be acclerating in negative y direction, and if box 1 was acclerating in the negative x direction then box 2 would be accelerating in the positive y direction, so the accelerations always hav opposite signs?

I still dont see why magnitudes of accelerations would be equal though
0

Author Commented:
The boxes are not moving in the video
0

Commented:
The acceleration must be the same for both blocks because they are tied together under tension.

If the blocks are acceleration, so is the cord.
If the cord were not massless, the vertical and horizontal tension forces would differ by the force
required to accelerate the cord.
0

Commented:
>>  Is it just because the accelerations have opposite directions?

Pretty much.  In a straight massless cord, the tension forces are always equal in magnitude
and opposite in direction.  The pulley lets you change the direction, but there is still the constraint
that you have noted.
0

Commented:
Conflicting ideas:
>> The boxes are not moving in the video
>> why is the acceleration the same for both blocks?

Are you sure the boxes are not moving? Maybe you are looking at a snapshot picture of moving boxes. If not moving, the velocities are constant 0; and then accelerations are constant 0 (i.e., no accelerations).
0

Author Commented:
its probably a snapshot of moving boxes but they aren't moving in the video. Like you say they are talking about acceleration so some movement is implied
0

Author Commented:
I'm still not fully convinced why the boxes are accelerating at the same rate

would it be possible for the boxes to accelerate at different rate whilst tied together under tension?
0

Commented:
No.

In the context of this problem, the cord can not stretch.
If m1 moves, m2 moves the same distance.

The displacements, the velocities, and the accelerations all have to match.

m2*g is pulling on the vertical end of the cord.
Friction proportional to m1*g is pulling on the horizontal end.
This guarantees tension will be maintained.
0

Commented:
>>  The displacements, the velocities, and the accelerations all have to match at every instant.

0

Author Commented:
thanks
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

## Featured Post

• 7
• 5
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.