basic physics - pulleys on a hill

Posted on 2010-08-25
Last Modified: 2012-05-10

I was hoping someone would look at the following question for me. I have tried to derive equation 1 below (the show derivation link isn't working so i can't check) in their solution below. I have scanned in my working out. When i did the problem i got the correct answer a totally different way so I wanted to check i could do it  their way too.

It might look a lot but it will only take you experts a couple of minutes I'm sure :)

Question by:andieje
LVL 84

Expert Comment

ID: 33526189
I would say force along the rope rather than force in x direction

Author Comment

ID: 33526252
Sorry what do  you mean?

Do you mean the derivation is wrong or that the derivation is ok but i shouldn't call the force Fx
LVL 84

Expert Comment

ID: 33526311
You can call it Fx, but it is only in the x direction at the very top of the pulley, so it may be confusing.
Free Tool: Postgres Monitoring System

A PHP and Perl based system to collect and display usage statistics from PostgreSQL databases.

One of a set of tools we are providing to everyone as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.


Author Comment

ID: 33526327
ok, see what you mean. Any comments on the derivation?

Expert Comment

ID: 33526728
Try starting like this:

Force for the rope is the same for both masses, and boxes don´t move, so:



Author Comment

ID: 33530299
santiago, i do appreciate that you can get to the equation in different ways. I was just interested in any comments on the way i had done it.

Another way would have been to say that net force along x axis = M2.g.sin2 - M1.g.sin1

so acceleration = (M2.g.sin2 - M1.g.sin1) / m1 + m2

LVL 13

Accepted Solution

Carl Bohman earned 500 total points
ID: 33534129
A piece of advice: You really ought to try to be consistent with your notation, specifically with the subscripts.  m1g is not the same as mg1.  The first implies more than one mass with a fixed value for g.  The second implies a single mass with multiple values for g.  While it is possible to realize that you mean the first when you write the second, such looseness has a much higher chance of leading to mistakes or miscalculations (which are even harder to find when the notation is inconsistent).

As to your derivation, I find it logical and relatively easy to follow (ignoring the notation inconsistencies).  In essence, you have defined equations for all elements of your system and then merged them into a single equation representing the entire system.  This basic approach is very repeatable, so it's a good approach to know.  Other approaches may be faster in some cases, but they often rely on a little more intuition (e.g., knowing how to quickly determine the net force as you did in ID:33530299) and/or are not generally applicable to all systems (e.g., consider if there were 3 or more masses or if the inclined plane was not a straight line or if the system was initially in motion).

Author Comment

ID: 33536802
I accept the point about the notation. I was just rushing when i wrote it out 'neatly' for this forum

Author Closing Comment

ID: 33536810
thanks - very useful advice

Featured Post

Free Tool: Path Explorer

An intuitive utility to help find the CSS path to UI elements on a webpage. These paths are used frequently in a variety of front-end development and QA automation tasks.

One of a set of tools we're offering as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Title # Comments Views Activity
Question of probability 6 114
Probability 2 66
Need a nodal sequencing tool 3 110
Permutation and Combination 9 98
We are taking giant steps in technological advances in the field of wireless telephony. At just 10 years since the advent of smartphones, it is crucial to examine the benefits and disadvantages that have been report to us.
Article by: Nicole
This is a research brief on the potential colonization of humans on Mars.
Although Jacob Bernoulli (1654-1705) has been credited as the creator of "Binomial Distribution Table", Gottfried Leibniz (1646-1716) did his dissertation on the subject in 1666; Leibniz you may recall is the co-inventor of "Calculus" and beat Isaac…
Finds all prime numbers in a range requested and places them in a public primes() array. I've demostrated a template size of 30 (2 * 3 * 5) but larger templates can be built such 210  (2 * 3 * 5 * 7) or 2310  (2 * 3 * 5 * 7 * 11). The larger templa…

790 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question