basic physics - pulleys on a hill

Posted on 2010-08-25
Last Modified: 2012-05-10

I was hoping someone would look at the following question for me. I have tried to derive equation 1 below (the show derivation link isn't working so i can't check) in their solution below. I have scanned in my working out. When i did the problem i got the correct answer a totally different way so I wanted to check i could do it  their way too.

It might look a lot but it will only take you experts a couple of minutes I'm sure :)

Question by:andieje
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
LVL 84

Expert Comment

ID: 33526189
I would say force along the rope rather than force in x direction

Author Comment

ID: 33526252
Sorry what do  you mean?

Do you mean the derivation is wrong or that the derivation is ok but i shouldn't call the force Fx
LVL 84

Expert Comment

ID: 33526311
You can call it Fx, but it is only in the x direction at the very top of the pulley, so it may be confusing.
Industry Leaders: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!


Author Comment

ID: 33526327
ok, see what you mean. Any comments on the derivation?

Expert Comment

ID: 33526728
Try starting like this:

Force for the rope is the same for both masses, and boxes don´t move, so:



Author Comment

ID: 33530299
santiago, i do appreciate that you can get to the equation in different ways. I was just interested in any comments on the way i had done it.

Another way would have been to say that net force along x axis = M2.g.sin2 - M1.g.sin1

so acceleration = (M2.g.sin2 - M1.g.sin1) / m1 + m2

LVL 13

Accepted Solution

Carl Bohman earned 500 total points
ID: 33534129
A piece of advice: You really ought to try to be consistent with your notation, specifically with the subscripts.  m1g is not the same as mg1.  The first implies more than one mass with a fixed value for g.  The second implies a single mass with multiple values for g.  While it is possible to realize that you mean the first when you write the second, such looseness has a much higher chance of leading to mistakes or miscalculations (which are even harder to find when the notation is inconsistent).

As to your derivation, I find it logical and relatively easy to follow (ignoring the notation inconsistencies).  In essence, you have defined equations for all elements of your system and then merged them into a single equation representing the entire system.  This basic approach is very repeatable, so it's a good approach to know.  Other approaches may be faster in some cases, but they often rely on a little more intuition (e.g., knowing how to quickly determine the net force as you did in ID:33530299) and/or are not generally applicable to all systems (e.g., consider if there were 3 or more masses or if the inclined plane was not a straight line or if the system was initially in motion).

Author Comment

ID: 33536802
I accept the point about the notation. I was just rushing when i wrote it out 'neatly' for this forum

Author Closing Comment

ID: 33536810
thanks - very useful advice

Featured Post

Enroll in May's Course of the Month

May’s Course of the Month is now available! Experts Exchange’s Premium Members and Team Accounts have access to a complimentary course each month as part of their membership—an extra way to increase training and boost professional development.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Title # Comments Views Activity
How to onstruct a table 4 51
Vertex form of the function 8 93
Calculating T-SCORE inside Excel. 3 366
110V Lasko bladeless fan blows with a burning smell 5 120
Complex Numbers are funny things.  Many people have a basic understanding of them, some a more advanced.  The confusion usually arises when that pesky i (or j for Electrical Engineers) appears and understanding the meaning of a square root of a nega…
Foreword (May 2015) This web page has appeared at Google.  It's definitely worth considering! How to Know You are Making a Difference at EE In August, 2013, one …
This is a video describing the growing solar energy use in Utah. This is a topic that greatly interests me and so I decided to produce a video about it.
I've attached the XLSM Excel spreadsheet I used in the video and also text files containing the macros used below.…

738 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question