Solved

multi-homed domain controller help!!

Posted on 2010-08-26
16
385 Views
Last Modified: 2013-11-09
I am trying to determine the purpose for a multi-homed domain controller in our environment.

When I pull up the status of the two NIC's i see send/receive packets being transferred on both NIC's.

Is there any way to determine what exactly is going on. I've had reports of weird DNS issues and DHCP issues after disabling the second NIC but I can't grasp how these server features can be bound to one NIC or another.

Can anyone help ?
0
Comment
Question by:dirkdigs
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 6
  • 5
  • 5
16 Comments
 
LVL 20

Expert Comment

by:woolnoir
ID: 33535744
Are the adaptors teamed ? are they on different networks (check the IP's), different VLANs (check the NIC properties ) - dual homing can caused issues, but it suggests that DHCP or DNS issues by disabling a NIC could effect a group of users if the cards are on separate networks.

Might be worth pasting the addressing information.
0
 
LVL 17

Expert Comment

by:Kvistofta
ID: 33535747
As a general rule of thumb you should make sure that multi-homed windows-computers are NOT configured with more than one default gateway. Verify this. Also make sure that your routing table is correct. run "route print" and have a look at it or post it here and describe your network settings.

/Kvistofta
0
 

Author Comment

by:dirkdigs
ID: 33535770
Windows IP Configuration



   Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : VANDCD301

   Primary Dns Suffix  . . . . . . . : PAC.AZA.NET

   Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Unknown

   IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No

   WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No

   DNS Suffix Search List. . . . . . : PAC.AZA.NET

                                       AZA.NET



Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection:



   Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . :

   Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Broadcom BCM5708C NetXtreme II GigE (NDIS VBD Client)

   Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-1C-23-D4-41-F8

   DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No

   IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 172.20.0.126

   Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0

   Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 172.20.0.2

   DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 172.20.0.20

                                       172.20.0.26



Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection 2:



   Connection-specific DNS Suffix  . :

   Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Broadcom BCM5708C NetXtreme II GigE (NDIS VBD Client) #2

   Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-1C-23-D4-41-FA

   DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No

   IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 172.20.0.20

   Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0

   Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 172.20.0.2

   DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 172.20.0.20

                                       172.20.0.26
0
[Live Webinar] The Cloud Skills Gap

As Cloud technologies come of age, business leaders grapple with the impact it has on their team's skills and the gap associated with the use of a cloud platform.

Join experts from 451 Research and Concerto Cloud Services on July 27th where we will examine fact and fiction.

 

Author Comment

by:dirkdigs
ID: 33535781
FYI the IP 172.20.0.26 (secondary DNS) is a backup DC.
0
 
LVL 17

Expert Comment

by:Kvistofta
ID: 33535800
Hou shouldnt have 2 nic:s in the same ip subnet, that is what is giving you trouble. If you need multiple ip addresses put them on the same nic and disable the other nic.

/Kvistofta
0
 
LVL 20

Expert Comment

by:woolnoir
ID: 33535882
Agreed with kvisrofa , dont see any logic in that setup. Move one IP to the other NIC and make it a single NIC server.
0
 

Author Comment

by:dirkdigs
ID: 33535905
is there any way to determine what exactly that second ip is for ? or do i basically just disable it and see what breaks .
0
 
LVL 17

Expert Comment

by:Kvistofta
ID: 33535973
You might find in applications like IIS that a service can be bound to a specific ip address. If you want to not break anything, do as I said above and put the ip from the disabled nic onto the still running nic. Windows can (could earlier at least) have multiple ip addreses on the same nic. Then you probably wont brake anything.

/Kvistofta
0
 

Author Comment

by:dirkdigs
ID: 33535998
this server is FILE, DC, DNS and DHCP only.
0
 
LVL 20

Expert Comment

by:woolnoir
ID: 33536088
i would check the DNS server and WINS (if you have it) for entries for your file server, check with IP they refer to and which NIC coresponds... hopfully it will be just one, and you can remove the other.
0
 
LVL 17

Expert Comment

by:Kvistofta
ID: 33536471
It wouldnt harm at all to have multiple ip:s on the same NIC.

/Kvistofta
0
 

Author Comment

by:dirkdigs
ID: 33545720
i think i figured out what this was setup for.

there are 2 sites. one in city a one in city b.

the site in city b had a dhcp scope set in regards to dns to resolve secondary dns to the second NIC of the dns server in city a.

i guess the second nic in city a was serving secondary dns requests for city b.

does this make sens? what do you guys think about it?

i still think i am going to get rid of it.
0
 
LVL 17

Accepted Solution

by:
Kvistofta earned 500 total points
ID: 33545875
Get rid of the NIC. Move the ip to the other nic if necessary.

/Kvistofta
0
 
LVL 20

Expert Comment

by:woolnoir
ID: 33548659
I agree with how the guy set it up in theory, i.e a secondary server for a remote site but having the server with two NICs seems like a waste. Its fine to have serverA running a secondary DHCP and DNS for city B.. but theres no need to confuse matters with a second nic. You can either migrate the NIC accross or maybe its time for a full re-evaluation how you do things. If all sites are on DHCP then then altering the DHCP servers should be easy :)

I'm assuming you have ip helpers on the local switches to allow DHCP broadcast helpers ? if you have cisco switches look for a 'ip helper-address' command in the VLAN or LAN config on the remote switches... you can simply change that to point at the primary IP on the server... there are ways to remove the need for the dual IP's.
0
 

Author Comment

by:dirkdigs
ID: 33549741
we are using sonicwall's.
0
 
LVL 20

Expert Comment

by:woolnoir
ID: 33549752
http://help.mysonicwall.com/sw/eng/705/ui2/23100/Network/IP_Helper.htm

this link should inform about IP HELPERS - you will probably find that the remote network has a IP HELPER for DHCP, pointing at one of the NIC addresses of the multihomed server, if you can find this you can alter it to the primary address and remove the need for the secondary... in theory :)
0

Featured Post

VIDEO: THE CONCERTO CLOUD FOR HEALTHCARE

Modern healthcare requires a modern cloud. View this brief video to understand how the Concerto Cloud for Healthcare can help your organization.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

#Citrix #Citrix Netscaler #HTTP Compression #Load Balance
This article is in regards to the Cisco QSFP-4SFP10G-CU1M cables, which are designed to uplink/downlink 40GB ports to 10GB SFP ports. I recently experienced this and found very little configuration documentation on how these are supposed to be confi…
If you're a developer or IT admin, you’re probably tasked with managing multiple websites, servers, applications, and levels of security on a daily basis. While this can be extremely time consuming, it can also be frustrating when systems aren't wor…
There's a multitude of different network monitoring solutions out there, and you're probably wondering what makes NetCrunch so special. It's completely agentless, but does let you create an agent, if you desire. It offers powerful scalability …
Suggested Courses

617 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question