Solved

Adding Static Route to VLAN - HP2610

Posted on 2010-08-26
7
1,971 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-10
I have 3 Vlans on my HP ProCurve 2610:

172.16.x.x - LAN
192.x.x.x -VOIP
10.x.x.x - other network

I have currently have 1 static route so traffic can get to the internet no matter which vlan it's on:
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.16.0.1

The Default GW on my 172 network is my 2610.

I need to add a static route on my 10.x.x.x vlan  so that applications trying to get to 2 servers on the 10.x network from the 172 network know where to go. Currently I add a static route on my XP machines but would like to just add it on the switch so I don't have to add it locally.

I need to add a static route
0
Comment
Question by:pwtadm
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2
7 Comments
 
LVL 4

Accepted Solution

by:
bhartwell earned 250 total points
ID: 33536953
first make sure you have enabled routing on the 2610, use the ip routing command, and then make sure that the clients default gateway is the ip of the particular vlan it is on. That should do the trick for you. So if host A is on the 172 vlan, the host's gateway should point to that 172 vlan IP, and the host's on the 10 network should have their gateways point to the 10 vlan ip address.
0
 
LVL 2

Expert Comment

by:fs40490
ID: 33537470
You should not need to add a static route.  If you configure routing on the router, then all should route correctly between the directly connected networks.  The reason is that all directly connected networks should be in the routing table automatically.

0
 

Author Comment

by:pwtadm
ID: 33538462
Thanks bhartwell.

ip routing is enabled. now since I have port 24 on the 2610 plugged into a switch on the 10.X network I marked that port as tagged on both the 172 and 10 vlans, is this correct as well?
0
Netscaler Common Configuration How To guides

If you use NetScaler you will want to see these guides. The NetScaler How To Guides show administrators how to get NetScaler up and configured by providing instructions for common scenarios and some not so common ones.

 
LVL 2

Assisted Solution

by:fs40490
fs40490 earned 250 total points
ID: 33538720
There should be no reason to tag it with both VLANs.  What you should do is show the routing table to ensure that the routing instance is building the routing table with both of your networks and an external static that you configured.
0
 
LVL 4

Expert Comment

by:bhartwell
ID: 33543577
I found this post somehwere and this person had a very similar issue as yours. One thing he realized he did that may have screwed things up was setting the IP's of the VLAN's prior to enabling IP Routing. Something about the way the switch works is that IP Routing needs to be enabled from the get go. Here was the summary of the post i saw with his resolution to the problem, hope this helps:
Mystery is finally solved........

The mistake I made, was configuring IP addresses to vlan interfaces before turning on IP routing This is not evident when you display the config with the "show run command". It simply shows IP routing turned on, and all the vlan interface addresses.

So I blew away the config (erase startup) rebooted the beast. And first config command issued was "IP routing". The switch is now operates / thinks as a "Lite router" not L2 switch. Next you apply ip addressing to vlans, port assignments etc and finally any static IP routes.

The box works a treat on the test bench.... Can ping and trace route across all subnets. In my example, Vlan 1 is used for manangement only, and vlan 2 and 3 are active subnets. Listed below are revised config commands / steps in appropriate order (Commands issued from console port):

Login
config
erase startup-config
box "reboot"
Login again

config
hostname Lite_Router
ip routing
no dhcp-relay

vlan 1
untagged 25-28
ip address 192.168.1.254 255.255.255.0
exit

vlan 2
name Data
untagged 1-12
ip address 192.168.2.254 255.255.255.0
exit

vlan 3
name Voice
untagged 13-24
ip address 192.168.3.254 255.255.255.0
exit

write memory
exit

Open in new window

0
 
LVL 4

Expert Comment

by:bhartwell
ID: 33543796
This link from HP should give you a pretty good understanding for the use of tagged vs untagged

http://forums11.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?threadId=1129101
0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:pwtadm
ID: 33546615
I did have to mark the port as untagged for both vlan1 and vlan3, fs40490 was correct
0

Featured Post

What is SQL Server and how does it work?

The purpose of this paper is to provide you background on SQL Server. It’s your self-study guide for learning fundamentals. It includes both the history of SQL and its technical basics. Concepts and definitions will form the solid foundation of your future DBA expertise.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Short answer to this question: there is no effective WiFi manager in iOS devices as seen in Windows WiFi or Macbook OSx WiFi management, but this article will try and provide some amicable solutions to better suite your needs.
If your business is like most, chances are you still need to maintain a fax infrastructure for your staff. It’s hard to believe that a communication technology that was thriving in the mid-80s could still be an essential part of your team’s modern I…
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…
In this tutorial you'll learn about bandwidth monitoring with flows and packet sniffing with our network monitoring solution PRTG Network Monitor (https://www.paessler.com/prtg). If you're interested in additional methods for monitoring bandwidt…

773 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question