Solved

RIS bandwidth intensive?

Posted on 2010-08-27
3
398 Views
Last Modified: 2013-12-12
EE,

Is their any reason why one would want to setup Server 2003 RIS on a seperate VLAN?

We have a virtual server (ESX) and was requested to put this within a different VLAN. They are sharing the same physical NIC.

My question is what are the load data with RIS when deploying images and can it really bog down the LAN? Current users on the network run a couple thousand.

Thanks again EE
0
Comment
Question by:snyderkv
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 2
3 Comments
 
LVL 16

Expert Comment

by:ThinkPaper
ID: 33546357
Putting RIS on a separate VLAN? I'm not exactly sure what that accomplishes... but i'd think it'd make it a bit more complicated to make RIS work if the workstations are in different VLANS as you'd probably have to configure the network settings to allow it to reach over.  I'm not a network engineer so I don't know too much about that. =/
From my experience, we've used RIS to deploy to a machine here and there and it didn't really affect the network that much. We had about 500-600 users on the network. Remember it's basically acting like a file copy - it's transferring the OS system files to the imaged machine, which then completes and starts installation
However, if you plan on doing mass deployments, I don't think RIS would be efficient. It may possibly bog it down and I don't think it allows for multicasting. Not totally sure as we've only used it for the occasional imaging.  

Have you pushed images via RIS? how's it fared so far? Did you notice any slowness?

http://thedailyreviewer.com/windowsxp/view/ris-how-fast-is-it-113156434
0
 

Author Comment

by:snyderkv
ID: 33548459
Cool thanks

So is there any reason not to Virtualize RIS? I know some things like Exchange and SCCM we cannot virtualize because we are using R710s and MD3000's and it just can't handl those types of sequential writes or whatever the reason was.

What would you say about this?
0
 
LVL 16

Accepted Solution

by:
ThinkPaper earned 500 total points
ID: 33555199
I don't see that problem in doing it.. but I'd advise doing a test and just throwing it up and seeing how/if it affects anything. Just make sure to configure the memory/process limits. We had done this for a different server, and it ended up hogging all the memory when it ran (but then again I don't think we had ours configured 100% properly >__<; )
0

Featured Post

Best Practices: Disaster Recovery Testing

Besides backup, any IT division should have a disaster recovery plan. You will find a few tips below relating to the development of such a plan and to what issues one should pay special attention in the course of backup planning.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

If your app took Google’s lash recently, here are the 5 most likely reasons.
While rebooting windows server 2003 server , it's showing "active directory rebuilding indices please wait" at startup. It took a little while for this process to complete and once we logged on not all the services were started so another reboot is …
The viewer will learn how to successfully download and install the SARDU utility on Windows 7, without downloading adware.
XMind Plus helps organize all details/aspects of any project from large to small in an orderly and concise manner. If you are working on a complex project, use this micro tutorial to show you how to make a basic flow chart. The software is free when…

751 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question