Solved

BE 12.5 Backups are slow upon new SAN implementation

Posted on 2010-08-29
5
711 Views
Last Modified: 2013-12-01
I need some advice about BE12.5 and slow data transfer and LTO4 drives going offline

We had backups running on two tape drives (one HP Storageworks 960 LTO3 via SCSI Cable) and one Storageworks 1840 LTO4 drive (SAS connection) Both Storageworks drives are directly connected to a DL380 G4 server running Windows 2008 server.

Data - We have an Iomega® StorCenter™ ix12-300r which is connected by ISCSI to our FP server. Currently, we have only one ethernet connection (cat6) to SAN, which in turn is connected to the SAS vis ISCSI.

The LTO3 SCSI - drive is backing up our Exchange server (ok and is working, but is slow 250-350 Mbs)
The LTO4 SAS drive - is backing up from our FP server /The FP Data is located in the SAN

Problem 1-
the LTO 4 (SAS)  drive drop connection intermittently in BE12.5 (12.5 Rev 2213), which cases us to restart services, if the drive spans, we loose the second tape data because the drive goes offline.


Problem2 - We are seeing speeds between 250-250MBS which cause our backups to run near 24 hours.

How can we speed up the process and address the drive offiine problem?




0
Comment
Question by:Catalyst72
  • 2
  • 2
5 Comments
 
LVL 21

Accepted Solution

by:
SelfGovern earned 300 total points
ID: 33559543
I''m confused when you are going from Ethernet to SAS to iSCSI -- do you have some sort of bridge?
A drawing of the topology with the connections at each end (when data enters or leaves a server, and enters a tape drive) including any adapters would be helpful.

250Mb/second is about 30MB/second, which may well be all that the server being backed up can provide.  The Windows file system is often slow; I've had clients with fast servers that couldn't read more than 10MB/sec because of small files, deeply nested directories, fragmentation, contention, etc.    You can download Library and Tape Tools from HP.Com/go/tape (free) and run performance tests to see how fast you can get data from the servers in question.

Network backups can also be a problem.   The total data you can get through a GbE pipe is probably going to be less than 100MB/sec -- although I've gotten over 110 in the lab.... that's not real world.  Making sure you have a TCP/IP Offload Engine NIC (TOE NIC) might help.

Are you performing encryption or compression in any of the steps before the data hits the tape drive?   These functions can each slow a backup by up to 50% (depending on speed of your processor, but note that they are single-threaded... so you can have 10 cores and it won't help).

For your device going offline problems, I'd make sure you're using the latest supported drivers and firmware for tape drive, library (if you're using one), HBA, etc.   You can find out supported configs at http://www.hp.com/go/ebs .    Make sure everything is exactly as specified in the EBS Compatibility Matrix, and see if things get better.   If not, consider swapping out HP tape drivers for Symantec drivers (or vice versa).
0
 
LVL 42

Assisted Solution

by:paulsolov
paulsolov earned 200 total points
ID: 33563438
check the disk latency on the IX12, if you can't check it from there check in on the Exchange Server.  You may be able to improve the backup by connecting the media server read only to the ISCSI LUN on the NAS, just make sure you configure it not to resignature.
0
 
LVL 1

Author Closing Comment

by:Catalyst72
ID: 33814202
I am sorry for the late comments....I did not have time to respond.
0
 
LVL 1

Author Comment

by:Catalyst72
ID: 33814213
Symantec ended up telling me that the my array controller (that is running every other instance if BE12.5 in our environment )is not compatible. We are successfully running backups now.

Problem one: You MUST deploy the remote BE agent through the media server if the server is alrady patched. Patches will be compbined with the agent install and will be installed with the agent. There is no seperate live update for the agent. 1 problem

Problem 2: Make sure your array controller is on the HCL before deploying BE12.5

Symantec get's a boooo from me. I'm sure alot of people are using the DL380G4's out there still. I can't see why the SCSI array controller 6i is not a supported hardware compenent on the BE12.5
0
 
LVL 42

Expert Comment

by:paulsolov
ID: 33814352
that is sad. I've setup plenty of media servers on the 600 series controllers. Can you upgrade to Backup Exec 2010 to see if there is some improvements?
0

Featured Post

Optimizing Cloud Backup for Low Bandwidth

With cloud storage prices going down a growing number of SMBs start to use it for backup storage. Unfortunately, business data volume rarely fits the average Internet speed. This article provides an overview of main Internet speed challenges and reveals backup best practices.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Replication has always been one of those technologies that people run scared from. The main reason is usually cost. When you think of replication, your mind drifts to solutions that replicate from one disk frame to another using block level technolo…
How to update Firmware and Bios in Dell Equalogic PS6000 Arrays and Hard Disks firmware update.
This tutorial will show how to configure a new Backup Exec 2012 server and move an existing database to that server with the use of the BEUtility. Install Backup Exec 2012 on the new server and apply all of the latest hotfixes and service packs. The…
Two types of users will appreciate AOMEI Backupper Pro: 1 - Those with PCIe drives (and haven't found cloning software that works on them). 2 - Those who want a fast clone of their boot drive (no re-boots needed) and it can clone your drive wh…

713 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question