Expiring Today—Celebrate National IT Professionals Day with 3 months of free Premium Membership. Use Code ITDAY17

x
?
Solved

DynCache and W2008R2 X64 part 2

Posted on 2010-08-31
2
Medium Priority
?
2,279 Views
Last Modified: 2013-11-29
MS has now confirmed that DynCache functionality is built-in the memory manager for 2008R2 (see Q_24824531), however the symptoms are exactly the same as for W2003 X64 & W2008 X64 without DynCache, high I/O causing the memory to be consumed until no more memory is available.

Does anyone know the W2008R2 equivalent to MaxSystemCacheMBytes (the DynCache method of limiting the amount of memory used by the System File Cache) ?

Thanks,
Ivor
0
Comment
Question by:Ivor_George
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
2 Comments
 
LVL 11

Accepted Solution

by:
Coast-IT earned 2000 total points
ID: 33565393
Microsoft have not given a method to do what you want to achieve as the functionality is built in to the OS.
0
 

Expert Comment

by:MunichJoe2009
ID: 34049528
Hi all,

I think it's time that they do! I'm having similar issues copying big files (virtual hard disk images) from and to external USB-connected hard disk devices. Even with USB 3.0 the problem remains that copying a file to the drive starts with >200 MB/sec and the progress bar runs up to 90% pretty fast. Meanwhile memory consumption goes way up, but at least not the whole free memory is consumed in my experience until now, and the system doesn't exactly freeze, but it's pretty annoying to have a progress bar rapidly going to 90%, then freezing for minutes to half hours, and see transfer rates drop from boasty 200 MB/sec down to nothing eventually. The overall bandwidth appears to be less than the one I'd have if no cache was used at all - I guess that's what XP did. I cannot disable the cache however, even configuring the external devices to be optimized for quick removal instead of performance in the hardware manager, they still behave this way.
I'm using clean Windows 2008 R2 x64 and Windows 7 x64 installations so it's surely not an upgrade issue. Memory is 8GB and 16GB, the problem is the same. It's no matter if internal drives are SSDs or classic SATA HDDs.
The problem is there. Microsoft needs to face it. Even if I love Windows 7 and 2008, XP has been way better in this aspect.

Greets,
Joe
0

Featured Post

What does it mean to be "Always On"?

Is your cloud always on? With an Always On cloud you won't have to worry about downtime for maintenance or software application code updates, ensuring that your bottom line isn't affected.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

After seeing many questions for JRNL_WRAP_ERROR for replication failure, I thought it would be useful to write this article.
Know the reasons and solutions to move/import EDB to New Exchange Server. Also, find out how to recover an Exchange .edb file and to restore the file back.
This tutorial will walk an individual through setting the global and backup job media overwrite and protection periods in Backup Exec 2012. Log onto the Backup Exec Central Administration Server. Examine the services. If all or most of them are stop…
Windows 10 is mostly good. However the one thing that annoys me is how many clicks you have to do to dial a VPN connection. You have to go to settings from the start menu, (2 clicks), Network and Internet (1 click), Click VPN (another click) then fi…

719 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question