Solved

Best way to setup colocation

Posted on 2010-08-31
3
569 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-10
We will be implimenting a colocation setup in the next 2 months and I would like to get some input on what will need to happen to make this work to maximum performance, availability and scalability.

GOALS
-Great performance between the 2 locations,
-Planning for if the WAN goes down and each location is no longer connected (high-availability).

SCENARIO
In this scenario we have location 1 and location 2.  Location one comprises of approximately 15 workstations/15 VOIP phones and location 2 comprises of 24 workstations/24 VOIP phones.  Location 2 will house the servers (SQL server, PDC, file share, etc) and I need to figure out what the best solution will be for site-to-site colocation connection Location 1's WAN link is 15Mbps up/15Mbps down and location 2 will be fibre - 5Mbps up/down burstable to 10Mbps.  I'm thinking of App-V for the accounting software, not sure about Exchange, and what about a SDC for Location 1 and what would I do about files stored on shared drives (replication of some kind)?



0
Comment
Question by:DSM_22
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 2
3 Comments
 
LVL 2

Expert Comment

by:markswelch
ID: 33576061
Maybe think about Centralizing what you can.  You could put the Exchange bridge head server in the colo, the mailbox servers in each site based on the users.  We keep our file servers local to the office they're used in.  You might also want to consider putting in a terminal server in the colo for local access to services you put in the colo.  This gives you LAN speeds and central access.  Hope this helps.
0
 

Author Comment

by:DSM_22
ID: 33577627
Thanks for the reply.  I'm leaning towards a terminal server too as the desktop applications required should have local LAN access to one another.  A second DC at the colo/Exchange bridgehead server seems like the route to go.  Local file shares also makes sense and I'll have to arrange for a separate off-site backup every night.

If anyone has any other comments please add them!

0
 

Accepted Solution

by:
DSM_22 earned 0 total points
ID: 33888183
I think we're just going to go with an application virutalization technology for the critical applications and a colo-DC.
0

Featured Post

[Webinar] Code, Load, and Grow

Managing multiple websites, servers, applications, and security on a daily basis? Join us for a webinar on May 25th to learn how to simplify administration and management of virtual hosts for IT admins, create a secure environment, and deploy code more effectively and frequently.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Quality of Service (QoS) options are nearly endless when it comes to networks today. This article is merely one example of how it can be handled in a hub-n-spoke design using a 3-tier configuration.
Use of TCL script on Cisco devices:  - create file and merge it with running configuration to apply configuration changes
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…
In this tutorial you'll learn about bandwidth monitoring with flows and packet sniffing with our network monitoring solution PRTG Network Monitor (https://www.paessler.com/prtg). If you're interested in additional methods for monitoring bandwidt…

739 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question