?
Solved

hyper-v setup

Posted on 2010-08-31
7
Medium Priority
?
629 Views
Last Modified: 2013-11-11
I'm in the process of setting up a hyper-v server that will host 2 machines. One will be a exchange 2007 box for a 30 user workgroup and the other will be an active directory box. I have a dell poweredge r710 that has 5 x 73 gb hdd's and 3 146 gb hdd's.

I've never set up an actual virtualized box before so I want to make sure I have my stuff straight before I proceed. I plan on using server 2008 r2 with the latest version of hyper-v as the base OS. Will hyper-v allow me to install a VM onto a specified raid array? I'd like to have 2 73 gb drives for the base OS, 3 73 gb drives for the ad box, and the 3 146 gb drives for exchange.

Or am I completely off base here?
0
Comment
Question by:MapleLife
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2
7 Comments
 
LVL 33

Expert Comment

by:PowerEdgeTech
ID: 33570326
You can choose where to store the VM's and VHD's when configuring them in Hyper-V, but I'm not sure of the exact performance difference there would be in having them on different arrays.  I can only think it would be advantageous to do so.
0
 
LVL 13

Expert Comment

by:Greg Hejl
ID: 33571207
MapleLife,

VM's use Virtual Harddrives VHD's - (folders)

set up Raid 1 for Host OS and a raid 10 set for Host Data - put your vhd's on the data drive.

I know this doesn't fit the drives you have but this is the best way to set up a host.  it gives you the most flexibility managing vhd's

Making host data a raid 10 set will provide plenty of IO for VHD's.

Create OS VHD and DATA VHD for each VM - make sure these are fixed vhd's as databases don't do well on dynamically expanding VHD's.  OS vhd drives are emulated ide.

Hyper v does have a passthrough feature to give a vm direct access to drives on the host.  this is for hi-performance demanding database and file server applications.  if you are doing a small office you shouldn't need to do this.  Passthrough disks will make your VM more like a physical server. restricting the sizes of physical drives leads to wasted drive space too.
0
 

Author Comment

by:MapleLife
ID: 33576595
Greg,

Will my hdd set up even allow a raid 10 config? Doesn't raid 10 need 4 or 5 disks of the same type? I suppose i could use the 5 73's but that would restrict my space. I'd rather have 5 146's.
0
Is Your AD Toolbox Looking More Like a Toybox?

Managing Active Directory can get complicated.  Often, the native tools for managing AD are just not up to the task.  The largest Active Directory installations in the world have relied on one tool to manage their day-to-day administration tasks: Hyena. Start your trial today.

 
LVL 33

Accepted Solution

by:
PowerEdgeTech earned 1000 total points
ID: 33577582
5 x 73 gb hdd's and 3 146 gb hdd's
RAID 10 cannot be set up on your controller with 3 HDD's ... you would need to get another 146GB drive if you were to go that route (or have a 4x73GB array - if you use three 146's and one 73, it will only use 73 of each drive for the array).
0
 
LVL 13

Assisted Solution

by:Greg Hejl
Greg Hejl earned 1000 total points
ID: 33578422
Hi Maple -
I started my hyper v experience with a similar drive situation - that box is now siting in a corner - realized quickly that assigning specific hardware to VM's defeats the purpose of VM's.  might as well stay with one purpose servers.

also wish i had just installed core server - hyper v manager can be run from anywhere.

i would keep 2 73's for host os and turn the other ones in and get 6 of the same size,  if you have 2 quad processors and at least 16 gigs ram your box could easily host a few more servers

i've been using extra horsepower on hosts to retire older servers using p2v.  it's swank!
 I've got an older PE2950 that runs DC, Exchange, SQL, and webserver.

your R710 could be around awhile
0
 

Author Comment

by:MapleLife
ID: 33578529
I spoke with my manager and he said he could probably work a 146 in there and give me 4 73's and 4 146's. I'd use the 146's for the data partition and 2 73's for the OS. Not sure what I'll do with the other 2 73's. I lobbied for 6 overall 146's but he doesn't think he can get the cost approved since we spent so much on the server.
0
 
LVL 13

Expert Comment

by:Greg Hejl
ID: 33581934
well have fun!  i've heard of some r710's holding 15 servers.  
0

Featured Post

Industry Leaders: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Issue: One Windows 2008 R2 64bit server on the network unable to connect to a buffalo Device (Linkstation) with firmware version 1.56. There are a total of four servers on the network this being one of them. Troubleshooting Steps: Connect via h…
A safe way to clean winsxs folder from your windows server 2008 R2 editions
This tutorial will walk an individual through configuring a drive on a Windows Server 2008 to perform shadow copies in order to quickly recover deleted files and folders. Click on Start and then select Computer to view the available drives on the se…
This tutorial will show how to configure a new Backup Exec 2012 server and move an existing database to that server with the use of the BEUtility. Install Backup Exec 2012 on the new server and apply all of the latest hotfixes and service packs. The…
Suggested Courses

752 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question