Solved

l2tp vpm

Posted on 2010-09-01
9
633 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-10
we are not connect l2tp vpn pls help me

config details: This is a config of port forwarding.

-A PREROUTING -d 12.12.12.2 -i eth0 -p udp -m udp --dport 1701 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.200.1

-A FORWARD -p esp -j ACCEPT
-A FORWARD -p ah -j ACCEPT
-A FORWARD -p udp -m udp --dport 1701 -j ACCEPT
-A FORWARD -p udp -m udp --dport 500 -j ACCEPT
-A FORWARD -p udp -m udp --dport 4500 -j ACCEPT
0
Comment
Question by:gopigops
  • 5
  • 4
9 Comments
 
LVL 3

Expert Comment

by:gremwell
Comment Utility
You should describe your setup in more details. The config of iptables you are troubleshooting -- is it on the vpn client host, or an intermediate router?
0
 

Author Comment

by:gopigops
Comment Utility
we have one server for windows 2003 act as a vpn server
we have one server for redhat act as a firewall
we are unable to connect vpn using l2tp, but pptp vpn works fine

this is a config

-A PREROUTING -d 12.12.12.2 -i eth0 -p udp -m udp --dport 1701 -j DNAT --to-destination 192.168.200.1

-A FORWARD -p esp -j ACCEPT
-A FORWARD -p ah -j ACCEPT
-A FORWARD -p udp -m udp --dport 1701 -j ACCEPT
-A FORWARD -p udp -m udp --dport 500 -j ACCEPT
-A FORWARD -p udp -m udp --dport 4500 -j ACCEPT
0
 
LVL 3

Expert Comment

by:gremwell
Comment Utility
I would suggest you to sniff the traffic on both interfaces of the firewall and see what packets get blocked when you try to establish the VPN. Check if IKE (UDP 500 or 4500) and IPSEC (ESP).

By the way, UDP 1701 packets travel encapsulated in IPSEC and are invisible to IPTABLES, the corresponding statements in your policy have no effect on L2TP. If you need DNAT, can try to apply it to IKE/ESP traffic.
0
 

Author Comment

by:gopigops
Comment Utility


we are unable to connect till now,pls tell me the above config correct or not.If not pls give me a correct config .

And then we have checked the traffic the show ony the isakmp and UDP
0
Find Ransomware Secrets With All-Source Analysis

Ransomware has become a major concern for organizations; its prevalence has grown due to past successes achieved by threat actors. While each ransomware variant is different, we’ve seen some common tactics and trends used among the authors of the malware.

 
LVL 3

Expert Comment

by:gremwell
Comment Utility
Please provide more details about your setup.

What OS do you use as a client? Does the L2TP client software support NAT-T (nat traversal)?
What is IP address of your client?
What IP address your client tries to connect to?

What is the IP address of the interface of your router facing L2TP client?
What is the purpose of DNAT statement, what address translation you are trying to achieve?
What is the IP address of the interface of your router facing L2TP server?

What is the IP address of the L2TP server?
0
 

Author Comment

by:gopigops
Comment Utility
ok i give

1.windows vista
2.public ip (internet work no issues)
3.public ip 12.12.12.2 (example)
4.12.12.12.2
5.
6.12.12.12.2
7.192.168.200.1 (windows 2003 server)
0
 
LVL 3

Accepted Solution

by:
gremwell earned 500 total points
Comment Utility
Assuming eth0 is your internet-facing interface, you have to apply the following:
# pass IKE traffic
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -p udp -d 12.12.12.2 --dport 500 -j DNAT --to 192.168.200.1
iptables -A FORWARD -i eth0 -p udp -d 12.12.12.2 --dport 500 -j ACCEPT

# pass IPSEC packets encapsulated in UDP datagrams
iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -p udp -d 12.12.12.2 --dport 4500 -j DNAT --to 192.168.200.1
iptables -A FORWARD -i eth0 -p udp -d 12.12.12.2 --dport 4500 -j ACCEPT

Open in new window

You don't need iptables rules you have posted earlier.

Some people say that running IPSEC servers behind NAT is bad idea http://support.microsoft.com/kb/885348/:

"... the default behavior of Microsoft Windows XP has changed with Service Pack 2 (SP2). IPSec NAT-T security associations to servers that are located behind network address translators are not recommended for Windows XP SP2-based computers. This change means that a Microsoft Windows Server 2003-based virtual private network (VPN) server that uses Layer Two Tunneling Protocol with IPSec (L2TP/IPSec) cannot be deployed behind a network address translator without additional configuration for Windows XP SP2-based VPN clients.

If you require IPSec for communication, we recommend that you use public IP addresses for all servers that you can connect to directly from the Internet. Windows-based client computers that support IPSec NAT-T can be located behind a network address translator. ..."

See http://support.microsoft.com/kb/947234 for instructions how to configure your Vista to allow connections to the VPN server located behind NAT.

0
 

Author Comment

by:gopigops
Comment Utility
we understand the IPSEC servers behind NAT.thanks..
0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:gopigops
Comment Utility
thanks..
0

Featured Post

Top 6 Sources for Identifying Threat Actor TTPs

Understanding your enemy is essential. These six sources will help you identify the most popular threat actor tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs).

Join & Write a Comment

Sometimes, you want your microsoft VPN to route all the traffic to the remote network. Usually your employer network. This makes it possible to access all the nodes inside this remote LAN, even if they have no "public DNS" entries. To do so, you wo…
This is an article about my experiences with remote access to my clients (so that I may serve them) and eventually to my home office system via Radmin Remote Control. I have been using remote access for over 10 years and have been improving my metho…
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…

763 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

12 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now