Solved

Metalun vs. larger raid group

Posted on 2010-09-01
6
628 Views
Last Modified: 2013-11-14
I was recently asked a question I cannot answer and I'd like to get some outside input on this.
We have an EMC Clariion environment.

We have a server that requires a single 2tb lun and pretty high IOPS, more than a single 5disk raid5 raidgroup can provide.

I have two choices, either go with a 10disk raid5 raidgroup with a single 2tb lun or go with 2x 5disk raid5 raidgroups and create a 2tb metalun across them.

Both would be utilizing all spindles. Every other raidgroup we have is a 5disk raid5 group. Other than "trying to keep all the raidgroups the same" what other reason do I have to go with one over the other?
0
Comment
Question by:narcus
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 3
  • 3
6 Comments
 
LVL 2

Author Comment

by:narcus
ID: 33581049
I'd like to add that I am referring to a striped metalun, not concatenate
0
 
LVL 30

Expert Comment

by:Duncan Meyers
ID: 33584189
The 10 disk RAID 5 group will be marginally faster, however that depends on your I/O profile. 4+1 and 8+1 RAID groups have an edge in some workloads as they allow the CLARiiON to perform "square" back-end writes - this effect will be most noticeable with a workload that generates heavy sequential writes. However, I recommend configuring the RAID groups as two 4+1 RAID 5 groups and use create a 2TB metaLUN out of two 1TB components as this allows for simpler expansion down the track. On the other hand, you could also consider a 10 disk RAID 1/0 group if you have high performance requirements, providing that gives you enough disk space. A 10 disk RAID 1/0 group of 450GB drives will give you 2016GB usable.
0
 
LVL 2

Author Comment

by:narcus
ID: 33586049
Thanks for the answer! We don't have insane IO requirements for this, but it DOES require 2tb which is more than one 4+1 can provide so I was left with the choice between the two. While sucking every bit of IOPS out of the array isn't necessary, I also don't want to waste performance. It sounds like it won't really make a difference with either setup. All of our other raidgroups are 4+1 and so far, keeping it homogeneous is the only compelling reason I have to go with a 4+1 over 8+1.
0
Complete VMware vSphere® ESX(i) & Hyper-V Backup

Capture your entire system, including the host, with patented disk imaging integrated with VMware VADP / Microsoft VSS and RCT. RTOs is as low as 15 seconds with Acronis Active Restore™. You can enjoy unlimited P2V/V2V migrations from any source (even from a different hypervisor)

 
LVL 30

Accepted Solution

by:
Duncan Meyers earned 500 total points
ID: 33592128
A 4+1 RAID 5 group also rebuilds faster in case of a catastrophic disk failure - that's probably enough to tip it over to 4+1s.

(Depending on what FLARE code you're running, your array will likely have pro-active hot-sparing where the array kicks in a mirror operation to the hot spare if a drive shows signs of failure. The pro-active hot spare operation typically takes about 30 minutes for a FC drive, compared to about 4 hours for a rebuild from parity, so you are less exposed to double drive failure and performance will not be clobbered)
0
 
LVL 2

Author Closing Comment

by:narcus
ID: 33596088
That's a pretty significant reason. So far, out of all my google searching, this has been the first GOOD reason to do one over the other.
0
 
LVL 30

Expert Comment

by:Duncan Meyers
ID: 33601156
Thanks! Glad I could help.
0

Featured Post

Why Off-Site Backups Are The Only Way To Go

You are probably backing up your data—but how and where? Ransomware is on the rise and there are variants that specifically target backups. Read on to discover why off-site is the way to go.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Finding original email is quite difficult due to their duplicates. From this article, you will come to know why multiple duplicates of same emails appear and how to delete duplicate emails from Outlook securely and instantly while vital emails remai…
Many businesses neglect disaster recovery and treat it as an after-thought. I can tell you first hand that data will be lost, hard drives die, servers will be hacked, and careless (or malicious) employees can ruin your data.
This video teaches viewers how to encrypt an external drive that requires a password to read and edit the drive. All tasks are done in Disk Utility. Plug in the external drive you wish to encrypt: Make sure all previous data on the drive has been …
This tutorial will walk an individual through the process of installing the necessary services and then configuring a Windows Server 2012 system as an iSCSI target. To install the necessary roles, go to Server Manager, and select Add Roles and Featu…

707 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question