Want to protect your cyber security and still get fast solutions? Ask a secure question today.Go Premium

x
  • Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 1350
  • Last Modified:

How to maximize network utilization

My network topology is like this:

Dual Cisco 4507 Core Switches
Cisco 3750-E Server Switches & Access Switches Ports at 1Gbps
10Gbps backbone between Access/Core/Server Switches

My main storage server is a HP DL360 G4p connected at 1Gbps to the Server Switches
It connects to an EMC AX4 via an iSCSI connection at 1Gbps

The other day we had someone copying data from an SD card directly to the storage server over the network. So, removable storage dragged to share drive.

When the person was copying the data from the SD card (about 6 GB I think) it took up 36Mbps on our MRTG graphs and essentially shut everyone else out. Nobody could get to files or do anything. It was really bad.  I told her to stop the copy and everything returned to normal. I assumed that it was the slow read rate of the SD card that caused the problem.

My question is this: Why, with a 1Gbps network and a 10Gbps backbone did that take down my network? I mean, all the other servers stopped the ability to talk, for the most part.

Second, I’m having similar issues today when the utilization on the network is reaching about 36Mbps to the APP server and things are dying. What can I do to help this? Why does it barely fill the capacity of the server and it kills everything?

I have verified that the connections are in fact 1000/full duplex connections.

Would a more powerful server help? Is my network not optimized somehow?
0
cmaohio
Asked:
cmaohio
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2
  • +2
2 Solutions
 
uescompCommented:
Depending on how big the network is, if you have departments you can however break them appart into V-Lans to reduce network chatter to the department vs the whole building, all you would then have to do is setup a crosslink so all systems can still talk to each other but remain in their own v-lan.  This is best optimized when you have different sections of the office consiting of i would say 5-10 people/pc's etc.

As for the above issue that can happen when transfering from multiple locations (meaning the sd card).  The server is attempting to grab a file located on another systems SD card reader so it will try to get the transfer done as soon as possible.  I personally would not go that route and instead have her copy the data first to her local system, then from the local system transfer it to the server etc.
0
 
eeRootCommented:
When you have some time at night or on a weekend, replicate the user's setup and benchmark your network speed with Jperf.  It's nice little program that can test network transfer speeds.

http://code.google.com/p/xjperf/

Then transfer some files back and forth while monitoring your connection with Wireshark.  Wireshark has a variety of statistcs and analysis reports that can help you see what problems the network is having.

http://www.wireshark.org/

Also, test the transfer times of a large file from a hard drive versus a SD card and see if you notice any network problems while doing so.  There's no reason for a single slow connection to take down the entire network.

If Jperf and wireshark don't help, can you post a network diagram and the confgs from the core switches?
0
 
lrmooreCommented:
Sounds like the bottleneck is the IO on the server, not the network.
0
Free Tool: SSL Checker

Scans your site and returns information about your SSL implementation and certificate. Helpful for debugging and validating your SSL configuration.

One of a set of tools we are providing to everyone as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

 
cmaohioSenior Systems ManagerAuthor Commented:
Yes Irmoore, it does sound like that. How do I increase that? Trunk two Ethernet ports?  Still I was less than 33% utilization on the interface.
0
 
aleghartCommented:
The bottleneck could be at the drives/controller.  As a reference, a single 7200rpm drive with Windows can max out at 20-30MB/sec.  Having a gigabit NIC would mean nothing.  Even Fast Ethernet could keep up with that.  But, if the server has no more IO to the storage system, then just about everything that's not cached in RAM will crawl.
0
 
lrmooreCommented:
Yeah, there's nothing you can do from a network perspective to speed up the IO on the server itself. It's all in the disk read/write/cache.. Get a better sever with faster drives? Perhaps RAID5 with 10 x 15K drives?
0
 
cmaohioSenior Systems ManagerAuthor Commented:
Ah, I see. So, that must be it. They are SATA 7200RPM drives. 4 in a RAID 5 configuration. So, that's my bottleneck. Man, that is unfortunate. All this stellar technology we spent money on and the DRIVES are the problem! damn!
0
 
cmaohioSenior Systems ManagerAuthor Commented:
Essentially there is no solution but the answer to the question was complete.
0
 
aleghartCommented:
No cost workaround (only costs you time and some drive space):

Backup.
Create 4-drive RAID-10.
Move data back.

You'll take a hit in drive space (RAID-1 space=2n, versus RAID-5 space=3n), but the performance boost should be noticeable.
0

Featured Post

Free Tool: Subnet Calculator

The subnet calculator helps you design networks by taking an IP address and network mask and returning information such as network, broadcast address, and host range.

One of a set of tools we're offering as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

  • 3
  • 2
  • 2
  • +2
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now