asked on pimpl + namespaces
Hi,
I have problem with pimpl idiom used with namespaces
I have tried this also but i get unresolved error
All is ok if class A is not in namespace
I have problem with pimpl idiom used with namespaces
--file1--
namespace space_a {
namespace implementation {
class Impl
{
public:
Impl();
void test();
};
}}
--file2--
#include file1
namespace space_a {
class A
{
public:
A();
private:
// here impl declaration *pimpl_;
// without namespaces i could do
// class Impl* pimpl_;
};
A::A()
{
pimpl_->test();
}
}
I have tried this also but i get unresolved error
--file1--
namespace space_a {
namespace implementation {
class Impl
{
public:
Impl();
void test();
};
}}
--file2--
#include file1
namespace space_a {
// new
namespace implementation {
class Impl;
}
class A
{
public:
A();
private:
//new
implementation::Impl* pimpl_;
};
A::A()
{
pimpl_->test();
}
}
All is ok if class A is not in namespace
C++
Last Comment
evilrix
You've not provided any implementation for the pimp test function.
ASKER
I do. Its example. In my project there is implementation.
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
THIS SOLUTION ONLY AVAILABLE TO MEMBERS.
View this solution by signing up for a free trial.
Members can start a 7-Day free trial and enjoy unlimited access to the platform.
ASKER
Hmm i see. So i have typo in my code.
I ask one additional question.
It is good? to name class impl and class using that impl same name? and differ them by namespace?
So i could have:
I ask one additional question.
It is good? to name class impl and class using that impl same name? and differ them by namespace?
So i could have:
namespace pipe_service {
namespace implementation {
class PipeService { // pimpl class
}
}}
and
namespace pipe_service {
class PipeService { // class that use pimpl
}
}
SOLUTION
THIS SOLUTION ONLY AVAILABLE TO MEMBERS.
View this solution by signing up for a free trial.
Members can start a 7-Day free trial and enjoy unlimited access to the platform.