Go Premium for a chance to win a PS4. Enter to Win

x
?
Solved

Can a NetApp volume shared over CIFS be used for Exch 2010 quorum?

Posted on 2010-09-06
13
Medium Priority
?
3,391 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-10
I'm in the process of deploying DAGs on Exchange 2010 and I'd like to use our NetApp-filer as quorum. However, I haven't seen any documentation covering how to use a NetApp Volume shared over CIFS as quorum space. Is this even possible (considering the DAG-configuration only has entries for "Witness Server" and "Witness Directory").

Thanks in advance!
0
Comment
Question by:NordCap
13 Comments
 
LVL 5

Expert Comment

by:MrN1c3
ID: 33611292
I dont see any reason why you couldn't use a CIFS share.
0
 
LVL 5

Expert Comment

by:Greg Jacknow
ID: 33611459
All the stuff I have read indicates the MS will only support a windows OS.  In part because you can leave the directory name blank and have the Install create it and set the rights which can only be done on a windows server with the correct permissions given to it.
That said if you specify both the directory name and server and set the permissions correctly, it should work, as from then on all it is doing is accessing a CIFS share.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd351172.aspx
If the witness server you specify isn't an Exchange 2010 server, you must add the Exchange Trusted Subsystem universal security group to the local Administrators group on the witness server. These security permissions are necessary to ensure that Exchange can create a directory and share on the witness server as needed. If the proper permissions aren't configured, the following error is returned:
Error: An error occurred during discovery of the database availability group topology. Error: An error occurred while attempting a cluster operation. Error: Cluster API "AddClusterNode() (MaxPercentage=12) failed with 0x80070005. Error: Access is denied."
0
 
LVL 42

Expert Comment

by:Paul Solovyovsky
ID: 33611539
Sharing over CIFS is not possible but that doesn't mean that you lose the advatages of a Netapp.

With Ontap 7.3.2 and higher you can thin provision and dedupe LUNs, therefore the Single Instance that you lose with Exchange 2010 you regain at the block level with the Netapp
0
Problems using Powershell and Active Directory?

Managing Active Directory does not always have to be complicated.  If you are spending more time trying instead of doing, then it's time to look at something else. For nearly 20 years, AD admins around the world have used one tool for day-to-day AD management: Hyena. Discover why

 
LVL 5

Expert Comment

by:Greg Jacknow
ID: 33614481
Of course now that we are getting away from shared storage for exchange clusters, MS recomends not having both copies of a database on the same SAN, but having at least one if not both on cheaper local (DAS) storage.  This keeps the SAN from being a single point of failure.
0
 

Author Comment

by:NordCap
ID: 33617903
Thanks for the feedback, very helpful indeed. We have a clustered SAN so single point of failure should not be a problem. But I don't understand how to specify the directory name as there are no traditional drives (e.g. C:\) on the NetApp, can one just use the share name (e.g EX14MBXQuorum$)?
0
 

Author Comment

by:NordCap
ID: 33618261
Ok, so I took a look at it again and for "Witness Directory" you have to use an "absolute, local, long file path that does not contain ~". How do I successfully supply a CIFS share such as \\host.domain.local\quorum$.
0
 
LVL 5

Expert Comment

by:Greg Jacknow
ID: 33618292
All CIFS shares have a \\servername\sharename format.  I would assume that when you create a CIFS share on you Netapp you will end up with something similar.
Keep in mind that this is not a supported config, as exchange cannot manage the "server" that this share is on.  
 
0
 

Author Comment

by:NordCap
ID: 33618360
I do indeed have a CIFS share (e.g. \\host.domain.local\quorum$) ready, but how do I get Exchange to use it? Within Exchange Management Console I have to supply "Witness Server" and "Witness Directory" and it accepts only FQDN resp. "an absolute, local, long file path that does not contain ~". Supplying any form of "\\host.domain.local\quorum$" will generate an error.
0
 
LVL 5

Expert Comment

by:Greg Jacknow
ID: 33619561
Well if you use the host.domain.local for the server and your share name as the directory and it dosn't work, then I guess they are insisting on running it on a supported OS where it creates the share for you.  You could try a share without the $.
Don't you have any other windows server that you could use for this?  Any member server will do.
0
 

Author Comment

by:NordCap
ID: 33624967
I see, that's unfortunate as the clustered SAN is the only absolute fail-safe point. Would it be possible to use two FSWs? E.g. both CASHUB-servers.
0
 
LVL 5

Accepted Solution

by:
Greg Jacknow earned 2000 total points
ID: 33627083
sort-of.  The whole point of the witness server is to give you an odd number of votes to make a wuarum of cluster members to decide what database is the active one.  So you only have one active FSW at a time.  
You can set an alternate FSW which is usually sone in a second site, that can be activated if the first site goes down.  This does not sound ncessary for you.
Check this link out.
I think you are sort of missing the point of the new paradigm of MS shared nothing clusters.  Instead of building complex systems with redundant parts, like the SAN...The servers and their storage are simpler, cheaper (and high performing if you do RAID 0, like MS) and totally separate from each other.  The witness is only needed if cluster nodes are down or out of communication with each other and the cluster needs to figure out which nodes are really on the network and should take ownership of a resource.
Having the witness on a seperate server with no SAN dependence is good.  FIY if you read the articly I linked in an earlier post it talks about how if you leave the server name blank for the witness server it will choose one of the hub servers.
0
 

Author Comment

by:NordCap
ID: 33635652
I understand. I also understand the new road MS is laying out with Exchange 2010 but I thought that if we already have a clustered (and in that way fail-safe) SAN, why not use it.
0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:NordCap
ID: 33635657
Good help.
0

Featured Post

Creating Active Directory Users from a Text File

If your organization has a need to mass-create AD user accounts, watch this video to see how its done without the need for scripting or other unnecessary complexities.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Article by: evilrix
Looking for a way to avoid searching through large data sets for data that doesn't exist? A Bloom Filter might be what you need. This data structure is a probabilistic filter that allows you to avoid unnecessary searches when you know the data defin…
Stellar Exchange Toolkit: this 5 in 1 toolkit comes loaded with mega-software tool. Here’s an introduction to tools’ usage and advantages:
This tutorial will walk an individual through the process of transferring the five major, necessary Active Directory Roles, commonly referred to as the FSMO roles to another domain controller. Log onto the new domain controller with a user account t…
This video demonstrates how to sync Microsoft Exchange Public Folders with smartphones using CodeTwo Exchange Sync and Exchange ActiveSync. To learn more about CodeTwo Exchange Sync and download the free trial, go to: http://www.codetwo.com/excha…
Suggested Courses

926 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question