Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of MaximusTech
MaximusTech

asked on

2 Private IP Ranges

Ok I will explain this the best I can.  Our network, that was set up long before me.  Our Ip range is 172.16.x.x and now we also have 172.17.x.x.  Our DC has our dhcp server on it and works fine for the 172.16.x.x address.  The 17 address range cannot see any assets on the network that carry 172.16 range and cannot access the internet.  Both ranges are setup in the router.  Our 172.16 range for uses a 255.255.255.0 mask.  Our server is 2003.  Can anyone tell me how to get the two ranges to see each other?
Avatar of rfc1180
rfc1180
Flag of United States of America image

you are either running into a routing issue are IP filtering issue. What type of router do you have.
What is the default gateway and subnet masks of the hosts that are in the 172.17.x.x?
Avatar of Jimmy Larsson, CISSP, CEH
What hardware is the router? Can you post the configuration here?

/Kvistofta
Avatar of MaximusTech
MaximusTech

ASKER

the default gateway is 172.17.1.1
and the subnet mask 255.255.0.0

your subnet mask is incorrect, change it to 255.255.255.0
Also please post the router config
Billy
rfc1180: Why is the mask incorrect?? 172.17 is a B-class network and /16 is perfectly fine.

/Kvistofta
his hosts in the 172.16 are using 255.255.255.0
hosts in the 172.17.x.x that are using 255.255.0.0 that are trying to communicate with 172.16 will never send a packet to the default gateway as the host(s) will assume that 172.16 is local

Also, we have asked for a posting of his config which will verify if the 2 networks are separate broadcast domains or if they are in fact local, if that is the case, then possible the hosts in 172.16.0.0 will need to change the mask to 255.255.0.0

Billy
"hosts in the 172.17.x.x that are using 255.255.0.0 that are trying to communicate with 172.16 will never send a packet to the default gateway as the host(s) will assume that 172.16 is local"

What? Why would a properly configured host in 172.17.0.0/16 believe that anything addressed 172.16.x.x is local???

/Kvistofta
>What? Why would a properly configured host in 172.17.0.0/16 believe that anything addressed 172.16.x.x is local???

yeah, you are right! My bad, I am thinking /8 not sure why; you are correct, the 172.17.x.x and 255.255.0.0 is the correct mask.

at any rate, we still need the config of the router

Billy
It's a bit unclear if the objective is to have two separate subnets that are interconnected or to have a single subnet.    That's because the author says: "and now we have ...."  So, it would help the Author to have this clear and it would help us to know so we can provide better advice.  Anyway, I strongly suspect that someone set up "17" addresses because they should have been available with 255.255.0.0

If that's the case then it's a matter of subnet masks matching the intent.  255.255.255.0 seems incorrect under *any* circumstance here - or there's not enough information to go on.
Yes, we are all guessing. The author needs to give more information.

/Kvistofta
you donot need to add router to connect 172.16.x.x and 172.17.x.x.change the subnet mask 255.255.254.0 in both the network.both network will communicate each other without router(will become same network actually).
goyal_251: That is totally wrong. Maybe you mean subnet mask 255.254.0.0?

/Kvistofta
no its 255.255.254.0 .......I am taking about CIDR(Classless Inter-Domain Routing)
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of Jimmy Larsson, CISSP, CEH
Jimmy Larsson, CISSP, CEH
Flag of Sweden image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
SOLUTION
Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Yes.. Kvistofta you are right,atucally we need to make the change in second octet.But the calculation I had given was for third octact.thanks for notifying the error.
You are welcome. ;)

/Kvistofta