asked on
Route traffic to vrf from interface not configured with vrf
Hello-- I have a so-tel phone switch that is connected to a cisco 6500 running ios. its connected to a vlan not configured with vrf, but it needs to send SOME of its traffic to routes that are in a vrf.
Help--
Thanks!!! Hooker
Help--
Thanks!!! Hooker
Networking ProtocolsNetwork ArchitectureRouters
Last Comment
Qlemo
SOLUTION
THIS SOLUTION ONLY AVAILABLE TO MEMBERS.
View this solution by signing up for a free trial.
Members can start a 7-Day free trial and enjoy unlimited access to the platform.
ASKER
Thanks for the quick response. I forgot to mention vrf-lite, fyi. And can i leak routes to the main routing table from a vrf?
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
THIS SOLUTION ONLY AVAILABLE TO MEMBERS.
View this solution by signing up for a free trial.
Members can start a 7-Day free trial and enjoy unlimited access to the platform.
SOLUTION
THIS SOLUTION ONLY AVAILABLE TO MEMBERS.
View this solution by signing up for a free trial.
Members can start a 7-Day free trial and enjoy unlimited access to the platform.
vrf-lite is no problem, the articles above apply to this as well. Also, see my example as to how to leake between the default vrf and another vrf.
ASKER
You all are so nice for responding so quickly. I wish wasnt so thick on this stuff. It seems complicated from what I have read. I basically have a vlan configured for vrf and several t1's in this vrf. There is a phone system that serves not only this customer (in the vrf) but others as well, not in the vrf. The phone system is going to send a request to the 6500 (with the vrf) for 192.168.3.x and will not find it in the global routing table. The simplest way to allow this route to be known is...
Cisco does not support any type of static routing as the document outlines, I would personally go with the dynamic route. Configure a GRE between the Global and the VRF as http://netnix.org/index.php?post_id=4 outlines as it meets the needs in what you are trying to accomplish.
Billy
Billy
This question has been classified as abandoned and is being closed as part of the Cleanup Program. See my comment at the end of the question for more details.