Want to win a PS4? Go Premium and enter to win our High-Tech Treats giveaway. Enter to Win

x
?
Solved

Advice on Optimal Hyper-V implementation

Posted on 2010-09-13
1
Medium Priority
?
885 Views
Last Modified: 2016-10-27
Looking for some best practice guidance regarding a project I'm starting for a customer. I have just received a fresh Dell T310 server with the following hardware

-2.53 Ghz Xeon X3440
-8 Gigs of RAM
-1TB RAID5 on a PERC S300
-2 Gigabit NICs
-Windows Server 2008 R2 x64 Standard w/Hyper-V

the customer has 3 XP Pro workstations and 5 printers. My idea for the new server goes as follows..(Am I on the right track?)

-Configure the new server to be the Hyper-V host
-3 XP VMs. 1 for each workstation
-1 XP VM for a print server
-1 server 08 VM as a DC

Additionally, I need a location for server side app installs and data storage. Should I create another VM for these two needs, or can I get away with just using physical disk space and resources on the Hyper-V host itself? The customer's budget is pretty tight, and I still need to purchase licensing for the 4 XP VMs.

The customer also currently utilizes dual monitors on each workstation. This is the first time I've encountered this scenario with Hyper-V. Can the workstations still use both monitors with the VM desktop?

Invest in Acronis? I'm a die hard Acronis fan and tend to recommend their disaster solution products to my customers. For this scenario, is it worth it for my client to spend another $850? Ultimately, everything important is residing on the server and I can snapshot it all. The workstations are basically dumb terminals running XP to RDP to the VM. Thoughts?



0
Comment
Question by:MichaelSmith
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
1 Comment
 
LVL 17

Accepted Solution

by:
James Haywood earned 2000 total points
ID: 33670191
I think you might be better leaving the XP workstations as standard machines and setting up a VM as a Terminal Server. This still uses the physical boxes as dumb terminals and you can drop the server side apps and data storage onto the VM aswell.

Have a second VM running as DC/Print server. As there are only 3 clients then the traffic will be fairly low and the DC should be able to handle both roles easily. I would recommend the following:

1 x VM, 4 x Cores, 2 x GB RAM, DC/DNS/DHCP/Print
1 x VM, 4 x Cores, 6 x GB RAM, Terminal Services, File Sharing, Server Apps
1 x Host, Hyper-V only, no roles or external connectivity
0

Featured Post

Learn Veeam advantages over legacy backup

Every day, more and more legacy backup customers switch to Veeam. Technologies designed for the client-server era cannot restore any IT service running in the hybrid cloud within seconds. Learn top Veeam advantages over legacy backup and get Veeam for the price of your renewal

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

After seeing many questions for JRNL_WRAP_ERROR for replication failure, I thought it would be useful to write this article.
This article outlines the struggles that Macs encounter in Windows-dominated workplace environments – and what Mac users can do to improve their network connectivity and remain productive.
This tutorial will walk an individual through the steps necessary to configure their installation of BackupExec 2012 to use network shared disk space. Verify that the path to the shared storage is valid and that data can be written to that location:…
This tutorial will walk an individual through configuring a drive on a Windows Server 2008 to perform shadow copies in order to quickly recover deleted files and folders. Click on Start and then select Computer to view the available drives on the se…

636 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question