In this FREE six-day email course, you'll learn from Janis Griffin, Database Performance Evangelist. She'll teach 12 steps that you can use to optimize your queries as much as possible and see measurable results in your work. Get started today!

Hi EEpeeps,

I want to learn tough VLSM but iam confuse on these a friend on cisco forum asked me some question so that i can practice for it but iam only able to answer easy ones.

Pls tell me what can be answer of "Not so easy ones" and "MUST" describe/explain how you solved it yourself this is what real question is :)

You are given an address of 76.222.112.64/22

First easy ones.

1. What are the network and broadcast addresses of this network?

2. How many hosts can be in the network?

Now not so easy.

3. Suppose you need to subnet that network. You need 6 subnets with at least 30 addresses each, 4 subnets with at least 100 addresses each, and 1 subnet with no more than 6 and no less than 4 host addresses. Is that possible? If so, how would you do it?

4. You are asked to summarize your network with a 76.216.232.111/17 network. What will the summary address be like provided you need the smallest summary possible?

I want to learn tough VLSM but iam confuse on these a friend on cisco forum asked me some question so that i can practice for it but iam only able to answer easy ones.

Pls tell me what can be answer of "Not so easy ones" and "MUST" describe/explain how you solved it yourself this is what real question is :)

You are given an address of 76.222.112.64/22

First easy ones.

1. What are the network and broadcast addresses of this network?

2. How many hosts can be in the network?

Now not so easy.

3. Suppose you need to subnet that network. You need 6 subnets with at least 30 addresses each, 4 subnets with at least 100 addresses each, and 1 subnet with no more than 6 and no less than 4 host addresses. Is that possible? If so, how would you do it?

4. You are asked to summarize your network with a 76.216.232.111/17 network. What will the summary address be like provided you need the smallest summary possible?

You are given an address of 76.222.112.64/22

First easy ones.

1. What are the network and broadcast addresses of this network?

next boundary is 24 .

24-22 = 2

2^2 = 4

Block Size is 4 ( counting in block size using 3rd octect )

76.222.0.0

76.222.4.0

.......etc

76.222.100.0

76.222.104.0

76.222.108.0

76.222.112.0 - subnet (network address )

76.222.115.255 ( broadcast address )

76.222.116.0

2. How many hosts can be in the network?

32-22 = 10 ( 22 bits used for network so the rest are host addresses )

2^10 number of hosts :)

Let me scratch my head for the hard ones..

the method i used is here

http://www.techexams.net/forums/ccna-ccent/38772-subnetting-made-easy.html

3. Suppose you need to subnet that network. You need 6 subnets with at least 30 addresses each, 4 subnets with at least 100 addresses each, and 1 subnet with no more than 6 and no less than 4 host addresses. Is that possible? If so, how would you do it?

You need these ranges:

1) 30 addresses each, times 6 -> 192 addresses total

2) 100 (128!) addresses each, times 4 = 512

3) 8 addresses (a range of 8 addreses gives you 6 host addresses available since the first address is the network address and the last is a broadcast address).

Sounds easy. First place the biggest chunks, 4x128 addresses:

76.222.112.0/25 (half of a c-class network)

76.222.112.128/25 (half of a c-class network)

76.222.113.0/25 (half of a c-class network)

76.222.113.128/25 (half of a c-class network)

Next chunks of 32 addresses:

76.222.114.0/26 (one quarter of a c-class network, from 0 to 64)

76.222.114.64/26

76.222.114.128/26

76.222.114.192/26

76.222.115.0/26

76.222.115.64/26

Now what we have left is the 115-network from .128 up to .255. That would easily fit the 8-addresses scope we need.

76.222.116.128/28

The addresses from 136 (128+8) are left for future uses.

4. You are asked to summarize your network with a 76.216.232.111/17 network. What will the summary address be like provided you need the smallest summary possible?

My network is 76.222.112.0/22, right. That is 76.222.[112-115].x. Now we want to summarize this with 76.216.232.111/17 which is 76.216.[232-233].x. So we need to find a common subnet for 76.216.[112-233].x which isnt that easy. If we start with a /16 we have 76.216.[whatever].x, which might be too easy. If we split that in halves (/17) we have 2 networks, 76.216.[0-127].x and 76.216.[128-255].x. We see that our span of third octet, 112-233 would be split by this netmask, so the smallest summary address would be /16, that is 76.216.0.0/16.

/Kvistofta

I did understand most of the part of yours answer except 4th answer ..actually i still dont understand this question yet how/why the hell we would summarize 76.222.112.64 with 76.216.232.111 i mean are we counting 76.0.0.0 as a common subnet and what is the need?

one more thing when we are dealing with this type of questions which given requirement we shold give preference if it says "500 hosts required per subnet" or "10 subnets required" within same question.

Thanks

So all except 4th were right?

And let me also tell you how i understands process of solving 4th question

1.Firstly we need to know what is classful network which is 76.0.0.0 then we need to consider right most octect comes after 76.X

2.Then we need to find common bits in binary in this first right-most octect and conclusion is 11011 then you added default classful network bits for the given network in question+common bits which is 8+5=13 is the answer

pls rectify me so that i wont have any confusion as iam studying for certification and is there any faster method for 2nd step u know binary method takes time and we have just 1:30 for everything

Thanks

I think you are pretty well on the spot. The exact way of thinking is different between all ov us. Each tech-guy has his own way of seeing/thinking/calculatin

Best way to do this is practice, practice and practice.

/Kvistofta

/Kvistofta

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.

But NOW I see that I am wrong. Forget everything I wrote above regarding #4. I see that the difference is in the 2:nd octet, not the third!

We have these networks:

* 76.222.112.64/22, which fools us to believe that that is the network address, but it isn´t. With a /22, the network address is 76.222.112.0/22.

* 76.216.232.111/17, which also fools us. The network address with that mask is 76.216.128.0/17.

so:

76.222.112.64/22

76.216.232.111/17

The first difference fro left to right is in the 2:nd octet. So the network/netmask-boundary should be in that 2:nd octet, right?

222 and 216. How do we define them as narrow as possible? If you cant see it by eyes I suggest that you write the numbers down in binaries:

128 64 32 16 8 4 2 1

222 = 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0

216 = 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0

So, how many bits are common for those numbers, from left to right? 11011, right which means 5 bits. So the network number is 11011 binary = 216.

Where is the boundary? First in 1:st octet we have 8 bits, then we have 5 bits in 2:nd octet, which give us 13 bits in the netmask. Conclusion: /13.

So the solution should be 76.216.0.0/13 which includes 76.[216-223].x.x

Sorry for bringing this confusion. :-)

/Kvistofta