?
Solved

Efficient way of defining error codes

Posted on 2010-09-14
9
Medium Priority
?
529 Views
Last Modified: 2012-06-27
I am currently working on a big existing software architecture in C++. It has error codes in the header file defined something like this:

static const int ERROR_ABC -1;
static const int ERROR_PQR -2;
static const int ERROR_XYZ -3;
.
.
.
.


Since -1, -2, etc values are clashing with some numerical results after the code was modified recently, I have been asked to come up with a more efficient method to handle error codes. Please give your suggestions (preferably with examples) to solve this problem. One idea I got was to change -1, -2 etc in the header file to something bigger like 100001, 100002, etc. Not sure if this is really a good way.
0
Comment
Question by:sukhoi35
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 3
  • 2
  • 2
  • +2
9 Comments
 
LVL 53

Assisted Solution

by:Infinity08
Infinity08 earned 400 total points
ID: 33671872
It depends on the range of acceptable values. If you use the same variable to store the result or the error code, then the error codes have to be outside of the range of valid values (obviously). Which ones you choose is up to you - one is not more efficient than the other.

A few notes though :

(a) why not use enums for defining error codes ?
(b) in cases where the valid values clash with the defined error codes, why not keep the error code separate from the result ? In other words, let the function return an error code (0 for success), and pass the result back via a function parameter.
0
 
LVL 32

Assisted Solution

by:phoffric
phoffric earned 1200 total points
ID: 33671882
How about:    enum Err_Code { ERROR_ABC = 0xFFAA, ERROR_PQR = 0xFFBB, ERROR_XYZ = 0xFFCC } err;>> Since -1, -2, etc values are clashing with some numerical results Not sure I understand how you got error codes mixed up with other numerical results, but maybe this extreme example will help.
class ERROR_CODE {
public:
   enum Err_Code {
       ERROR_ABC = 0xFFAA,
       ERROR_PQR = 0xFFBB,
       ERROR_XYZ = 0xFFCC
   } err;
};

int main() {
   ERROR_CODE::Err_Code err_status;
   err_status = ERROR_CODE::ERROR_ABC;
}

Open in new window

0
 
LVL 84

Expert Comment

by:ozo
ID: 33671888
what results are they clashing with, and how are those results obtained?
0
What does it mean to be "Always On"?

Is your cloud always on? With an Always On cloud you won't have to worry about downtime for maintenance or software application code updates, ensuring that your bottom line isn't affected.

 
LVL 12

Assisted Solution

by:w00te
w00te earned 400 total points
ID: 33671901
Make your errors into an enumeration, and start the enumeration values equal to whatever high number you want.  After explicitly definign the first enumeration value, the rest of the enumerations will progress from there by default.

enum ErrorCodes
{
    ERROR_ABC = 100001,
    ERROR_PQR,
    ERROR_XYZ
};

When you want to print the codes, you can just std::cout<<ERROR_ABC; or the containing variable.

-w00te
0
 
LVL 32

Accepted Solution

by:
phoffric earned 1200 total points
ID: 33672520
Revision of code:1) Used static2) Added namespace exampleThe idea is to limit what assignment operations can be made, and hopefully avoid numeric clashes.
namespace ERR_CODE {
   static enum Err_Code { ERROR_ABC = 0xFFAA, ERROR_PQR = 0xFFBB, ERROR_XYZ = 0xFFCC };
}

class ERROR_CODE {
public:
   static enum Err_Code { ERROR_ABC = 0xFFAA, ERROR_PQR = 0xFFBB, ERROR_XYZ = 0xFFCC };
};

int main() {
   ERROR_CODE::Err_Code err_status;
   ERR_CODE::Err_Code   err_code_stat;
   err_status = ERROR_CODE::ERROR_ABC;
   err_code_stat = ERR_CODE::ERROR_ABC;

   int val = err_code_stat;  // ok, but not desirable
   err_code_stat = val;      // compiler error (good)

   val = err_status;         // ok, but not desirable
   err_status = val;         // compiler error (good)
}

Open in new window

0
 

Author Comment

by:sukhoi35
ID: 33676639
Hi Experts,
Thank you very much for all your responses. The main reason for me to do this little refactoring of error handling is that the current code is kind of old and some changes were done to fit a customer requirement.

static const int ERROR_ABC -1;
static const int ERROR_PQR -2;
static const int ERROR_XYZ -3;

void func()
{
           nRet = callFunc();

           if(nRet==ERROR_ABC)
                 return nRet;
          else if(nRet==ERROR_PQR)
                  return nRet;
          else
          return nRet;
}

In the earlier code callFunc() returned a min value of 0 only. Because of some unplanned modifications that were done, now the minimum value that it can return is -1 which incidentally equals ERROR_ABC.

Will award points and close the question soon
0
 
LVL 53

Expert Comment

by:Infinity08
ID: 33676724
The example code you gave does not make much sense. You're always returning nRet, so you might as well have left out all checks :

        int func() {
            return callFunc();
        }

which still seems unnecessary. But I assume a few things got lost when you posted that code here.



>> Because of some unplanned modifications that were done, now the minimum value that it can return is -1

I think the advice already given covers that :)
0
 

Author Comment

by:sukhoi35
ID: 33680368
Yes you are right, I have not really pasted the original code here (since I am not supposed to) but typed it myself in a hurry. so, many things are not there above.

I anyway got the solution, so am closing the question. Thanks Everyone  :)
0
 

Author Closing Comment

by:sukhoi35
ID: 33680388
Thanks!
0

Featured Post

VIDEO: THE CONCERTO CLOUD FOR HEALTHCARE

Modern healthcare requires a modern cloud. View this brief video to understand how the Concerto Cloud for Healthcare can help your organization.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

This tutorial is posted by Aaron Wojnowski, administrator at SDKExpert.net.  To view more iPhone tutorials, visit www.sdkexpert.net. This is a very simple tutorial on finding the user's current location easily. In this tutorial, you will learn ho…
Windows programmers of the C/C++ variety, how many of you realise that since Window 9x Microsoft has been lying to you about what constitutes Unicode (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicode)? They will have you believe that Unicode requires you to use…
The goal of this video is to provide viewers with basic examples to understand how to create, access, and change arrays in the C programming language.
The viewer will learn how to pass data into a function in C++. This is one step further in using functions. Instead of only printing text onto the console, the function will be able to perform calculations with argumentents given by the user.

771 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question