?
Solved

Secondary DHCP Server

Posted on 2010-09-14
6
Medium Priority
?
386 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-10
We currently had a Windows 2003 Server setup to be our Active Directory, DNS, and DHCP server.  We also have another Windows 2003 Server that is our primary file server.  Both are Virtual Machines running in an ESX4 cluster of 3 VMware hosts.

We recently promoted our file server to be a secondary Active Directory Domain Controller and also installed DNS on it so we now have a backup domain controller and DNS server.

Does it make sense to have the file server also be a backup/secondary DHCP server as well, or is that not necessary?  Or is it even possible?  What happens to the workstations that reboot if the DHCP server is down and there isn't another DHCP server to process the DHCP requests?

Thank you in advance for any insight provided.
0
Comment
Question by:Chad_J_Lemmer
  • 3
  • 2
6 Comments
 
LVL 6

Expert Comment

by:Joshua_Peters
ID: 33678888
We have ours set up that way.  2 DHCP and 2 DNS at each location.
0
 
LVL 36

Expert Comment

by:Seth Simmons
ID: 33678901
It's better to have a second server.  You could split your scope of addresses between the two.  I do that here and works fine.  Having only one is a single point of failure for clients if it fails and they can't get an address.
0
 

Author Comment

by:Chad_J_Lemmer
ID: 33678959
I've seen other solutions where you split the IP address ranges between 2 DHCP servers, using exclusions to control which server handles which IP ranges.

Is there a way to setup a fully redundant DHCP service on another server, like you can for the AD controller and DNS?  Or is splitting the IP ranges between server the only/best option?
0
Free Backup Tool for VMware and Hyper-V

Restore full virtual machine or individual guest files from 19 common file systems directly from the backup file. Schedule VM backups with PowerShell scripts. Set desired time, lean back and let the script to notify you via email upon completion.  

 
LVL 6

Accepted Solution

by:
Joshua_Peters earned 252 total points
ID: 33678970
I think it would be less work to split them. You could set it up as a cluster but that is a lot more work.
0
 
LVL 36

Assisted Solution

by:Seth Simmons
Seth Simmons earned 248 total points
ID: 33678974
yes split them is the best idea.  dhcp are local databases, not ad integrated like dns
0

Featured Post

Free Tool: Path Explorer

An intuitive utility to help find the CSS path to UI elements on a webpage. These paths are used frequently in a variety of front-end development and QA automation tasks.

One of a set of tools we're offering as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

This may not be a text book method to resolve VSS backup issues but it seemed to have worked on few of the Windows 2003 servers we had issues while performing a Volume Shadow Copy backup. If you have issues while performing a shadow copy backup usin…
A Cisco router can be configured as a DHCP Server. There are advantages and disadvantages in making your Cisco router work as DHCP Server. Almost all the features for windows DHCP can be configured on Cisco-based DHCP server. Some of the features me…
Please read the paragraph below before following the instructions in the video — there are important caveats in the paragraph that I did not mention in the video. If your PaperPort 12 or PaperPort 14 is failing to start, or crashing, or hanging, …
When cloud platforms entered the scene, users and companies jumped on board to take advantage of the many benefits, like the ability to work and connect with company information from various locations. What many didn't foresee was the increased risk…

850 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question