Solved

Secondary DHCP Server

Posted on 2010-09-14
6
383 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-10
We currently had a Windows 2003 Server setup to be our Active Directory, DNS, and DHCP server.  We also have another Windows 2003 Server that is our primary file server.  Both are Virtual Machines running in an ESX4 cluster of 3 VMware hosts.

We recently promoted our file server to be a secondary Active Directory Domain Controller and also installed DNS on it so we now have a backup domain controller and DNS server.

Does it make sense to have the file server also be a backup/secondary DHCP server as well, or is that not necessary?  Or is it even possible?  What happens to the workstations that reboot if the DHCP server is down and there isn't another DHCP server to process the DHCP requests?

Thank you in advance for any insight provided.
0
Comment
Question by:Chad_J_Lemmer
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 3
  • 2
6 Comments
 
LVL 6

Expert Comment

by:Joshua_Peters
ID: 33678888
We have ours set up that way.  2 DHCP and 2 DNS at each location.
0
 
LVL 35

Expert Comment

by:Seth Simmons
ID: 33678901
It's better to have a second server.  You could split your scope of addresses between the two.  I do that here and works fine.  Having only one is a single point of failure for clients if it fails and they can't get an address.
0
 

Author Comment

by:Chad_J_Lemmer
ID: 33678959
I've seen other solutions where you split the IP address ranges between 2 DHCP servers, using exclusions to control which server handles which IP ranges.

Is there a way to setup a fully redundant DHCP service on another server, like you can for the AD controller and DNS?  Or is splitting the IP ranges between server the only/best option?
0
Get 15 Days FREE Full-Featured Trial

Benefit from a mission critical IT monitoring with Monitis Premium or get it FREE for your entry level monitoring needs.
-Over 200,000 users
-More than 300,000 websites monitored
-Used in 197 countries
-Recommended by 98% of users

 
LVL 6

Accepted Solution

by:
Joshua_Peters earned 63 total points
ID: 33678970
I think it would be less work to split them. You could set it up as a cluster but that is a lot more work.
0
 
LVL 35

Assisted Solution

by:Seth Simmons
Seth Simmons earned 62 total points
ID: 33678974
yes split them is the best idea.  dhcp are local databases, not ad integrated like dns
0

Featured Post

Free learning courses: Active Directory Deep Dive

Get a firm grasp on your IT environment when you learn Active Directory best practices with Veeam! Watch all, or choose any amount, of this three-part webinar series to improve your skills. From the basics to virtualization and backup, we got you covered.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Configuring network clients can be a chore, especially if there are a large number of them or a lot of itinerant users.  DHCP dynamically manages this process, much to the relief of users and administrators alike!
Restoring deleted objects in Active Directory has been a standard feature in Active Directory for many years, yet some admins may not know what is available.
Come and listen to Percona CEO Peter Zaitsev discuss what’s new in Percona open source software, including Percona Server for MySQL (https://www.percona.com/software/mysql-database/percona-server) and MongoDB (https://www.percona.com/software/mongo-…
Monitoring a network: how to monitor network services and why? Michael Kulchisky, MCSE, MCSA, MCP, VTSP, VSP, CCSP outlines the philosophy behind service monitoring and why a handshake validation is critical in network monitoring. Software utilized …

689 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question