Solved

Is Intel I5 processor suitable for SQL server 2005 32 bit or 64 bit?

Posted on 2010-09-14
7
1,100 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-10
Is Intel I5 processor suitable for SQL server 2005 32 bit or 64 bit?
0
Comment
Question by:GSGDBA
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
7 Comments
 
LVL 95

Assisted Solution

by:Lee W, MVP
Lee W, MVP earned 31 total points
ID: 33679708
It should work fine, if that's what you're asking, assuming you have very minimal databases.  Beyond that, it MAY work fine - it really depends on the requirements of your databases/database applications.
0
 
LVL 3

Author Comment

by:GSGDBA
ID: 33679762
What would you suggest for testing server?
0
 
LVL 95

Expert Comment

by:Lee W, MVP
ID: 33679778
Depends what you're testing.  If your testing a load the size of google.com, then I'd suggest a server farm with thousands of systems.

If you're testing a load of 3 workstations running a query every 5 minutes, then an i5 should be more than fine.
0
Industry Leaders: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

 
LVL 70

Assisted Solution

by:KCTS
KCTS earned 31 total points
ID: 33679950
The I5 is a 64 bit processor, so assuming you install a 64bit version of Windows, you can run SQL64 bit and take full advantage of the better performace and memory management.

You can install a 32 Windows/SQL in the I5 but you will not be utilizing the hardare to its best advantage
0
 
LVL 5

Assisted Solution

by:shanyuen
shanyuen earned 31 total points
ID: 33680455
Both of them would be fine.
64 bit OS with 64 bit SQL is the right choice.
Because 32 bit OS/APP cannot use memory higher than 4 GB.
2 ^32 < 4 GB

So why still using 32 bit ?
0
 
LVL 5

Accepted Solution

by:
chqshaitan earned 32 total points
ID: 33680841
Yea, to follow up on everyone elses comments the processor is fine for any reasonable sized database. The critical constraint on a database is ram, the processor (within reason) is secondary.

If the database is small enough to fit into ram you are onto a winner.
0
 
LVL 3

Author Closing Comment

by:GSGDBA
ID: 33805127
Thanks for your valuable comments
0

Featured Post

Does Powershell have you tied up in knots?

Managing Active Directory does not always have to be complicated.  If you are spending more time trying instead of doing, then it's time to look at something else. For nearly 20 years, AD admins around the world have used one tool for day-to-day AD management: Hyena. Discover why

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Background Information Recently I have fixed file server permission issues for one of my client. The client has 1800 users and one Windows Server 2008 R2 domain joined file server with 12 TB of data, 250+ shared folders and the folder structure i…
In this article I will describe the Backup & Restore method as one possible migration process and I will add the extra tasks needed for an upgrade when and where is applied so it will cover all.
This tutorial will show how to push an installation of Backup Exec to an additional server in both 2012 and 2014 versions of the software. Click on the Backup Exec button in the upper left corner. From here, select Installation and Licensing, then I…
This tutorial will walk an individual through the steps necessary to configure their installation of BackupExec 2012 to use network shared disk space. Verify that the path to the shared storage is valid and that data can be written to that location:…

730 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question