Solved

Routing port 80 traffic to DSL WIC on Cisco 2600 Router

Posted on 2010-09-15
3
688 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-10
Hi,

Currently we have the following set up on our Cisco 2600 router:

2 WIC each with a T1 attached
1 DSL WIC for DSL backup

Both T1's are bonded for 3 up and down and if they both go down the DSL takes over for backup.

What I would like to do is keep the same setup, but for all port 80 traffic, direct it to the DSL for faster access.

Is this possible in the router? I hate paying for a DSL connection when it just sits there in standby.

Thanks!
0
Comment
Question by:fairrington
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 3
3 Comments
 
LVL 20

Expert Comment

by:woolnoir
ID: 33682354
So you want to route any tcp:80 stuff i.e web traffic OUTGOING through the DSL connection ? I just wanted to be clear as to your requirement.
0
 
LVL 20

Accepted Solution

by:
woolnoir earned 500 total points
ID: 33682385
if so, this was posted somewhere else on experts exchange, essentially you need policy based routing which the 2600 series does support.

Try something like this:
\\-- remove current default routes
no ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 interfaceX <-- replace as needed
no ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 InterfaceY <-- replace as needed
!
\\-- create two acls to define www traffic and all other traffic
access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq www
access-list 102 permit ip any any

\\-- create route-map with 2 conditions
route-map www permit 10
 match ip address 101
 set ip next-hop <DSL upstream gateway>
route-mdap www permit 20
 match ip address 102
 set ip next-hop X.Y.Z.X  <== remote end of T1

\\-- apply the route-map to the local LAN interface
interface Fast 0/0 <-- replace as needed
  ip policy route-map www
0
 
LVL 20

Expert Comment

by:woolnoir
ID: 33682397
and there is a typo i think on the second 'route-map' statement.
0

Featured Post

Independent Software Vendors: We Want Your Opinion

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

While it is possible to put two routes in place with the secondary having a higher metric, this may not always work. In the event of a failure that does not bring down the physical interface on the router the primary route is not removed. There is a…
New Server 172.16.200.2  was moved from behind Router R2 f0/1 to behind router R1 int f/01 and has now address 172.16.100.2. But we want users still to be able to connected to it by old IP. How to do it ? We can used destination NAT (DNAT).  In DNAT…
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…

730 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question