?
Solved

storage savings with dedupe on Netapp FAS2020 vs EMC NX4

Posted on 2010-09-15
1
Medium Priority
?
1,342 Views
Last Modified: 2013-11-14
I am looking to see if anyone has experience with these 2 SANs and see what their experiences are with deduplication.

I am setting up a virtual environment that will have 7 virtual servers running on it. It will be using NFS for the VMs. The main server is a mail server with 100 users. There will also be a domain controller, print server, 2 database servers (they are small and only have 2 users on each, so small IO), a internal web server for 50 users with small usage, and a test server. This environment does not have a high load altogether. Due to this I am looking to use dedupe on the production VMs and see how it impacts the performance.

However I am wondering what kind of savings I might see with the different options. I know that NetApp will dedupe on a block level so I would expect to save a good amount of space with the multiple OS's and also in the mail since there will be a lot of duplicated emails and attachments. I am not as familiar with the savings that I will be getting with EMC. First I am assuming that the file level deduplication will not have any affect on the duplicate files in the VMs since it is within a VmDK file.Also I believe that I will not see any compression of the VMDK files? I read on one site where someone tested a similar setup and realized no compression with the VMDKs. Anyone have any ideas if this has changed?

From what I have seen it looks like NetApp will realize a much better space savings in this setup. Does anyone disagree with this and why?
0
Comment
Question by:ryan80
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
1 Comment
 
LVL 22

Accepted Solution

by:
robocat earned 2000 total points
ID: 33689336

We typically see Netapp deduplication savings in the order of 60% - 80% for VMWare environments. You get the best results by cloning virtual servers or creating the VMs using a template.

NFS is a good way to go because the deduplication savings are actually available to the VMWare hosts. If you use LUNs, you only get space savings on the level of the storage system (e.g. for creating additional LUNs), but the VMWare hosts never see these savings.

0

Featured Post

Why Off-Site Backups Are The Only Way To Go

You are probably backing up your data—but how and where? Ransomware is on the rise and there are variants that specifically target backups. Read on to discover why off-site is the way to go.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

This article aims to explain the working of CircularLogArchiver. This tool was designed to solve the buildup of log file in cases where systems do not support circular logging or where circular logging is not enabled
The question appears often enough, how do I transfer my data from my old server to the new server while preserving file shares, share permissions, and NTFS permisions.  Here are my tips for handling such a transfer.
Teach the user how to edit .vmx files to add advanced configuration options Open vSphere Web Client: Edit Settings for a VM: Choose VM Options -> Advanced: Add Configuration Parameters:
Teach the user how to install and configure the vCenter Orchestrator virtual appliance Open vSphere Web Client: Deploy vCenter Orchestrator virtual appliance OVA file: Verify vCenter Orchestrator virtual appliance boots successfully: Connect to the …
Suggested Courses

765 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question