Solved

Using Dynamic NAT to translate internal addresses to different network on DMZ interface

Posted on 2010-09-16
10
476 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-10
Hello All,

I have a Cisco ASA that has a DMZ interface. I need clients from 172.21.172.0 255.255.252.0 on the inside to appear on the DMZ interface as 172.24.16.x 255.255.255.0. The DMZ is 172.21.175.1 connected to a VPN hardware device at 172.21.175.2. I need clients to connect through the ASA to the 172.20.x.x 255.255.x.x. I have everything setup up including routes and the global and nat statement. I want make sure my config wioll do this. Thank you.  
ASA-connected-to-hardware-VPN-de.txt
0
Comment
Question by:greenbeanx81
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 7
  • 3
10 Comments
 

Author Comment

by:greenbeanx81
ID: 33697248
Can this be done? I'm not sure if you can use different ip pool for a global command and a different ip on the DMZ interface..
0
 
LVL 10

Expert Comment

by:ddiazp
ID: 33697286
you need to change

nat (DMZ) 2 172.21.172.0 255.255.252.0

to

nat (inside) 2 172.21.172.0 255.255.252.0

other than that, the rest looks fine
0
 

Author Comment

by:greenbeanx81
ID: 33697391
The minute I add the second statement my clients on the 172.21.174.x 255.255.255.x lose their internet.
0
Retailers - Is your network secure?

With the prevalence of social media & networking tools, for retailers, reputation is critical. Have you considered the impact your network security could have in your customer's experience? Learn more in our Retail Security Resource Kit Today!

 

Author Comment

by:greenbeanx81
ID: 33697422
Here is my route table:

S    172.21.173.0 255.255.255.0 [1/0] via 172.21.174.1, inside
C    172.21.175.0 255.255.255.252 is directly connected, DMZ
C    172.21.174.0 255.255.255.0 is directly connected, inside
S    172.20.0.0 255.255.0.0 [1/0] via 172.21.175.2, outside
C    24.199.46.232 255.255.255.248 is directly connected, outside
S*   0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 [1/0] via 24.199.46.233, outside

I have 172.21.173.0/24 and and 172.21.174.0/24 on the inside. I looks like once I add the nat (DMZ) inside statement it routes the inside networks to the DMZ interface.. strange..
0
 

Author Comment

by:greenbeanx81
ID: 33697454
I removed 172.20.0.0 255.255.0.0 [1/0] via 172.21.175.2, outside line and specified the networks I want to go to the VPN device with no go.
0
 

Author Comment

by:greenbeanx81
ID: 33699260
Okay...I am now trying to use Policy Nat with global and nat commands. My configuration is below:

access-list Harland_VPN extended permit ip 172.21.173.0 255.255.255.0 172.24.16.0 255.255.255.0
access-list Harland_VPN extended permit ip 172.21.174.0 255.255.255.0 172.24.16.0 255.255.255.0
access-list dmz extended permit ip any any
global (outside) 1 interface
global (DMZ) 2 172.24.16.1-172.24.16.254 netmask 255.255.255.0
nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
nat (inside) 2 access-list Harland_VPN
route DMZ 172.20.3.0 255.255.255.0 172.21.175.2
route DMZ 172.20.4.0 255.255.255.0 172.21.175.2
route DMZ 172.20.5.0 255.255.255.0 172.21.175.2
route DMZ 172.20.6.0 255.255.255.0 172.21.175.2

I tried to telnet or ping to the address 172.20.3.1. The connection is closed imediately and I do no not see any entrys in the xlate or conn tables:

TORRANCEASA# sh xlate
6 in use, 284 most used
Global 24.199.46.236 Local 172.21.174.10
PAT Global 24.199.46.234(50879) Local 172.21.174.19(2190)
PAT Global 24.199.46.234(46690) Local 172.21.174.26(1047)
PAT Global 24.199.46.234(63189) Local 172.21.174.226(58396)
PAT Global 24.199.46.234(7968) Local 172.21.174.24(1045)
PAT Global 24.199.46.234(57215) Local 172.21.174.14(2682)  

TORRANCEASA# sh conn  
58 in use, 164 most used
TCP outside 172.16.1.1:51310 inside 172.21.174.226:3389, idle 0:00:09, bytes 253159, flags UIOB
TCP outside 76.195.149.211:5721 inside 172.21.174.19:2190, idle 0:00:11, bytes 81868, flags UIO
TCP outside 76.195.149.211:5721 inside 172.21.174.26:1047, idle 0:00:27, bytes 157060, flags UIO
TCP outside 76.195.149.211:5721 inside 172.21.174.226:58396, idle 0:00:04, bytes 86008, flags UIO
TCP outside 76.195.149.211:5721 inside 172.21.174.24:1045, idle 0:00:27, bytes 81508, flags UIO
TCP outside 76.195.149.211:5721 inside 172.21.174.14:2682, idle 0:00:04, bytes 142730, flags UIO

My question is should the config work and how can I verify that the Nat translation actually is working? packet capture?  I'm not seeing anything that says the firewall is routing out the DMZ interface towards 172.21.175.2 as the next hop. I need to use a range for the global command so I do not think policy nat with the static command will work. Thank you.
ASA-that-needs-to-route-inside-h.txt
0
 
LVL 10

Expert Comment

by:ddiazp
ID: 33706279
With the existing config you won't see traffic from your inside network towards the DMZ on your translation tables simply because it's not translating them:

Your Harland_VPN doesn't have an entry for the DMZ; In the ther hand you're trying to telnet to 172.20.3.1, which should send the traffic through the VPN. Because it's a VPN you should not NAT it at all, or the vpn won't work (unless your access-lists on the other end of the VPN are configured for the nat IPs) so you should add:

access-list NONAT extended permit ip 172.21.174.0 255.255.255.0 172.20.3.0 255.255.255.0

So the firewall doesn't translate these packets.

Do you have a config for the other side of the VPN?



Another thing I noticed is this:

Your VPN Peer is 24.x.x.x

Your destination for 172.20.3.0 255.255.255.0 is 172.21.175.2

Since 172.21.175.2 is not your Peer; does this traffic allow VPN traffic through? Is this a router? is there a route towards the other VPN peer?




0
 

Author Comment

by:greenbeanx81
ID: 33708927
The tuunel-group is for a tunnel that is disabled. I'm not using that.


I want to send traffic out the DMZ interface appearing as 172.24.16.0/24 to a third party VPN hardware device connected at 172.21.175.2. The ASA is not doing the VPN. 172.21.175.2 is doing the VPN. Here is a diagram.
DMZ-network-diagram-visio.vsd
0
 
LVL 10

Accepted Solution

by:
ddiazp earned 500 total points
ID: 33708946
then you need to add:

access-list Harland_VPN extended permit ip 172.21.173.0 255.255.255.0 172.20.3.0 255.255.255.0
access-list Harland_VPN extended permit ip 172.21.174.0 255.255.255.0 172.20.3.0 255.255.255.0

This way you nat from inside to DMZ, translating them to 172.24.16.0/24 if the destination IP is 172.20.3.0/24.

the current

access-list Harland_VPN extended permit ip 172.21.173.0 255.255.255.0 172.24.16.0 255.255.255.0
access-list Harland_VPN extended permit ip 172.21.174.0 255.255.255.0 172.24.16.0 255.255.255.0

are not doing anything
0
 

Author Comment

by:greenbeanx81
ID: 33709290
Ok I see where I went wrong. I already had the 172.24.16.0 network for the global so the access-list is just to trigger the policy. I added 172.20.0.0 255.255.0.0 to the access-list since I want the 172.20.3.0 to 172.20.6.0 networks to route. I'll test and see if it works. Thank you.
0

Featured Post

Retailers - Is your network secure?

With the prevalence of social media & networking tools, for retailers, reputation is critical. Have you considered the impact your network security could have in your customer's experience? Learn more in our Retail Security Resource Kit Today!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

This article offers some helpful and general tips for safe browsing and online shopping. It offers simple and manageable procedures that help to ensure the safety of one's personal information and the security of any devices.
A 2007 NCSA Cyber Security survey revealed that a mere 4% of the population has a full understanding of firewalls. As business owner, you should be part of that 4% that has a full understanding.
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…
As a trusted technology advisor to your customers you are likely getting the daily question of, ‘should I put this in the cloud?’ As customer demands for cloud services increases, companies will see a shift from traditional buying patterns to new…

707 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question