Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of stoltzhelpdesk
stoltzhelpdeskFlag for United States of America

asked on

Mailflow problems with Exchange 2003 & 2010 Coexistence

I recenlty introduced a new Exchange 2010 server into my existing exchange 2003 environment.  My only issue is when sending mail from a mailbox on the 2003 server to a test mailbox on the 2010 server.  Messages sent in any other direction are working properly.

I inherited a single exchange 2003 server environement with an Ironport appliance facing the public side for mail relay and antispam/antivirus.
For some reason the messages being sent from the 2003 mailbox to the 2010 mailbox are getting hung up in the routing group connector queue (automatically created when 2010 was installed).  The 2003 mailbox will receive a delivery status notification delay with a 4.4.7 message from my exchange 2003 server.  I've checked the mail logs on my Ironport and found that the messages are actually being sent to the Ironport instead of directly to my exchange 2010 server.  I believe this is because my exchange 2003 server is sending the message out on the default SMTP virtual server after it sees that the mailbox is not local to the 2003 server. The default SMTP virtual server is set to forward to my Ironport.  Is there anyway to get around this?  I only have 1 nic/IP setup on the exchange 2003 server now, so I can't setup a second SMTP virtual server.

Exchange 2003 is running on windows server 2003 sp2
Exchange 2010 (rollup 4) is running on windows server 2008 sp2
My AD forest is at a 2003 functional level, but the resource domain that the exchange servers are in is windows server 2008 enterprise sp2 w/2 DC's that are both Global Catalog servers.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Jason
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of Glen Knight
Glen Knight
Flag of United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
SOLUTION
Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
SOLUTION
Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
once you verify that you can deliver a message to 2010
you could use the send connector on 2010 for outbound messages and remove the smtp connector
All endital did was repeat my posts, were my posts not helpful?
Avatar of stoltzhelpdesk

ASKER

demazter:  your posts were helpful, but I felt endital1097 comments were easier to understand and more complete.  thanks again for the quick responses.
>> i was typing as demazter posted and didn't see his comment. seen this several times and that's why i posted
You will find if you look at my second post and enditals first they are almost identical.  The problem is also explained in my article quite clearly.
This question has been classified as abandoned and is being closed as part of the Cleanup Program. See my comment at the end of the question for more details.