• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 1536
  • Last Modified:

Cluster Size for Exchange 2010

Is there an optimal cluster size when formatting a hard drive for a E2K10 database.
I saw something where is says: 'The best size for the Exchange 2010 Mailboxes would be 32k NTFS Cluster size, since this maps 1:1 to the Mailbox Cluster Size. Is thsi correct? I have a E2K7 with cluster size of 65,536 kb.
0
johnnymags
Asked:
johnnymags
  • 3
  • 2
1 Solution
 
init2winit_DanCommented:
Is it a virt? if so match the cluster size of host storage if not 32 would work best.
0
 
johnnymagsAuthor Commented:
Not a virt. Is this specific to E2K10 or does it also apply to E2K7, just curious. thanks again
0
 
init2winit_DanCommented:
Well we have run 2007 for a long time and i do not recall the install setting for cluster size being an issue i would think that it has to do more with 2010.  I can not find any concrete evidence for other wise.
0
 
johnnymagsAuthor Commented:
Thanks for the info, one final question:
I typically put the data and log files on two separate partitions, but on the same SCSI container. Would it be wise to do this with E2K10 or should the database and logs go on one big partition, and if the logs go on a separate partition should 32k be used as the cluster size for the log files?
0
 
init2winit_DanCommented:
Best practice:
1-logic drive for OS, LOGS, DB/store, Transact
0

Featured Post

Free Tool: Subnet Calculator

The subnet calculator helps you design networks by taking an IP address and network mask and returning information such as network, broadcast address, and host range.

One of a set of tools we're offering as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

  • 3
  • 2
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now