johnnymags
asked on
Cluster Size for Exchange 2010
Is there an optimal cluster size when formatting a hard drive for a E2K10 database.
I saw something where is says: 'The best size for the Exchange 2010 Mailboxes would be 32k NTFS Cluster size, since this maps 1:1 to the Mailbox Cluster Size. Is thsi correct? I have a E2K7 with cluster size of 65,536 kb.
I saw something where is says: 'The best size for the Exchange 2010 Mailboxes would be 32k NTFS Cluster size, since this maps 1:1 to the Mailbox Cluster Size. Is thsi correct? I have a E2K7 with cluster size of 65,536 kb.
Is it a virt? if so match the cluster size of host storage if not 32 would work best.
ASKER
Not a virt. Is this specific to E2K10 or does it also apply to E2K7, just curious. thanks again
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
ASKER
Thanks for the info, one final question:
I typically put the data and log files on two separate partitions, but on the same SCSI container. Would it be wise to do this with E2K10 or should the database and logs go on one big partition, and if the logs go on a separate partition should 32k be used as the cluster size for the log files?
I typically put the data and log files on two separate partitions, but on the same SCSI container. Would it be wise to do this with E2K10 or should the database and logs go on one big partition, and if the logs go on a separate partition should 32k be used as the cluster size for the log files?
Best practice:
1-logic drive for OS, LOGS, DB/store, Transact
1-logic drive for OS, LOGS, DB/store, Transact