aarontham
asked on
FIFO, LIFO and AVERAGE method
I designing a inventory system.
can i have some sample table which can do FIFO, LIFO and AVERAGE method.
can i have some sample table which can do FIFO, LIFO and AVERAGE method.
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
8080_Diver
You may want to do a bit more reading on the three costing methods. ;-)
SOLUTION
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Here is a previous question that may have some additional information of interest:
https://www.experts-exchange.com/questions/24844550/how-to-calculate-costing-methods-in-inventory-program.html
https://www.experts-exchange.com/questions/24844550/how-to-calculate-costing-methods-in-inventory-program.html
aarontham, *laughing* I guess I didn't look to see that it was you. Figuring you already know about the other question, so never mind my previous link -- though, it might serve as a nice reference here for other readers.
To that point, though, it would be nice to hear how much you have progressed in the last year. Hopefully this is going well for you.
To that point, though, it would be nice to hear how much you have progressed in the last year. Hopefully this is going well for you.
I have to question how the accepted "answer" is an answer at all. Accepting a social comment as an answer out of friendship will tend to discourage experts from resonding to questions by the author because there is no connection between helping the author and having one's answer accepted.
@Moderator,
Please explain to me how the answer was accepted and I received an email at 09:21 pm CDT on October 25 and the acceptance is finalized as of 09:00 October 26! Had I been given the chance, I would have objected to the selected "answer" being accepted. :-/
@Moderator,
Please explain to me how the answer was accepted and I received an email at 09:21 pm CDT on October 25 and the acceptance is finalized as of 09:00 October 26! Had I been given the chance, I would have objected to the selected "answer" being accepted. :-/
ASKER
HI 8080 Diver,
is you who ask me to read more on the three costing methods. so i thought you are not interested to comment for more.
and i already forget what mwvisa1 was explain last year. that why i ask again same question.
and mwvisa did comment for more on this post.
pls advice.
is you who ask me to read more on the three costing methods. so i thought you are not interested to comment for more.
and i already forget what mwvisa1 was explain last year. that why i ask again same question.
and mwvisa did comment for more on this post.
pls advice.
aarontham,
I not only suggested that you read more but also provided more information, with which mwvisa agreed. My point in my most recent message was that, if you intended to select mwvisa's comment that included the link as the solution, then you shouldhave done so rather than selecting the one in which mwvisa, basically, made a social comment.
I not only suggested that you read more but also provided more information, with which mwvisa agreed. My point in my most recent message was that, if you intended to select mwvisa's comment that included the link as the solution, then you shouldhave done so rather than selecting the one in which mwvisa, basically, made a social comment.
@aarontham,
Supporting 8080_Diver, the issue isn't that I was awarded solution, but the comment which was awarded. I too would have expected:
http:#a33963547
http:#a33963530
http:#a33962752
Or any combination therein to have been selected as solution. If you would like to correct this, you can ask a Moderator to re-open the question on your behalf. There will be no objections from me. Just glad we could help and glad that my posting a link to your own question was actually helpful << I felt silly after that one. *smile*
Kevin
Supporting 8080_Diver, the issue isn't that I was awarded solution, but the comment which was awarded. I too would have expected:
http:#a33963547
http:#a33963530
http:#a33962752
Or any combination therein to have been selected as solution. If you would like to correct this, you can ask a Moderator to re-open the question on your behalf. There will be no objections from me. Just glad we could help and glad that my posting a link to your own question was actually helpful << I felt silly after that one. *smile*
Kevin
ASKER
Guys,
sorry i guess there is some miss understandting here.
sorry i guess there is some miss understandting here.
No need for apologies. Just glad we could help.
Best regards and happy coding (or accounting),
Kevin
Best regards and happy coding (or accounting),
Kevin