Solved

Tabnabbing - how it spreads

Posted on 2010-11-08
6
735 Views
Last Modified: 2013-12-06
Hi fellow experts,

Im trying to solve the puzzle. I was asked to help my friend with his web server compromised with javascript code injected in some asp and php web pages. What I discovered so far is that is Tabnabbing "attack", a relativelly new form of phishing attack. Looks pretty scary. Detailed info here:

http://www.azarask.in/blog/post/a-new-type-of-phishing-attack/

What is the security hole thats causing this and how this spreads, I mean I understand what it does, but how was that code injected in asp or php files in the first place?

Thanks in advance.

Regards
0
Comment
Question by:R-Byter
  • 3
  • 2
6 Comments
 
LVL 1

Expert Comment

by:h4x0r_007
ID: 34089164
Your browser automatically runs and executes the code. And by the way, the link that you provided is actually infected: AVG blocked it and warned me that the website was trying to tabnab me. So to block this exploit, you probably need good security software. See screenshot:

Tabnabber.jpg
0
 
LVL 14

Author Comment

by:R-Byter
ID: 34089220
Thats what it should do, You're right. But Aza Raskin is currently Creative Lead for Firefox. So he just explained and showed live demo about tabnabbing phishing attack. WHat is left unknown is how that code was injected in asp or php pages at web server (code that executes this kind of phishing attack)?

Regards
0
 
LVL 3

Accepted Solution

by:
Johndo58 earned 500 total points
ID: 34101397
This may help it explains how this Phishing exploit actually works and possible ways of protecting yourself.

"Here's how it works, and you can watch it happen yourself by loading the proof-of-concept (which is also the page where Raskin explains the exploit). Although Aza Raskin tested primarily with Firefox, I was able to verify that the exploit also works in the Mac versions of Safari, Camino, Opera, and OmniWeb, though not quite in the same way in each. The current version of Google Chrome (5.0.375.55) appears to be immune to the problem, though it's possible that Google fixed it quickly, since others have previously reported Chrome as vulnerable.

Imagine you're browsing the Web and you end up at a particular page, call it SneakyPage. It doesn't look evil, and it may in fact be a totally legitimate site that has been compromised by a bad guy. But it contains a tiny bit of malicious JavaScript that loads with the page, and that JavaScript does nothing unless you switch to another tab, leaving the tab holding SneakyPage open.

At that point, the malicious JavaScript springs into action, replacing the SneakyPage tab's favicon, title, and page content. Remember, you're off in another tab, or even in another program, so you're not paying attention at this point.

SneakyPage could pretend to be Gmail or Hotmail or Citibank or any other commonly used site. The specifics don't matter; all it has to do is make you believe that the tab contains a legitimate login form for a service you use.

At some point later, you come back to the tab, see the login form, and decide that yes, you do want to log back in to check your email or your account balance. Once you do so, SneakyPage's JavaScript snags your login credentials for future nefarious purposes and redirects you to the actual site, so you're none the wiser that you've just fallen victim to a phishing attack.

"But," I can hear you saying, "how would the malicious script be able to guess that I use Gmail or Citibank or whatever?" The problem is that it's possible to figure out if a user has visited specific sites, thanks to the way most sites identify visited links by changing their colors via CSS. So the malicious JavaScript we're postulating could determine if you use any of a set of particular Web sites, and then fake an appropriate one. LWN.net has an article describing this browser history leak in more detail, and if you don't believe it, visit StartPanic.com for a personalized demonstration.

The elephant gun solution is to turn off JavaScript entirely, or, for Firefox users, run the NoScript extension, which enables you to block JavaScript on all sites but those you allow (Google Chrome has this capability too). Unfortunately, turning off JavaScript entirely renders the modern Web nearly unusable. And NoScript is an option only for Firefox users, and even then, many people find it - or Google Chrome's similar feature - too intrusive for everyday use.

Worse, security researcher Aviv Raff has figured out a way to simulate the exploit without using JavaScript. Brian Krebs links to Raff's proof-of-concept from his Krebs on Security blog post; it's best to start there since the proof-of-concept morphs a mockup of Krebs's post into a Gmail login screen. The NoScript extension may protect against Raff's approach as well, but regardless, the type of users who would be fooled by tabnabbing aren't as likely to be the sort of people who would be running NoScript.

So how much of a worry is tabnabbing, and what can you do? My gut feeling is that if you stick to mainstream legitimate Web sites, you have little to worry about. However, that doesn't mean that avoiding sleazy destinations like file download sites is a guarantee of safety. In September 2009, the New York Times Web site served a rogue advertisement that purported to scan for viruses. If a criminal organization was somehow able to sneak a tabnabbing JavaScript into an ad and place it on legitimate sites via an ad network, it could wreak havoc.

If there's no guarantee of safety - at least until browser makers figure out a solution - how can you protect yourself? I see a few realistic options that don't require extra effort and could even make your life easier:

If you ever switch to a tab and it's displaying a login screen, be very wary. No, scratch that. Just close the tab - it's not worth thinking about whether it might be an attack.
Rely on auto-fill, either via the browser's own auto-fill feature or a program like 1Password, to enter login credentials, and if the auto-fill doesn't work (as it wouldn't in the case of a faked login page because the domain wouldn't match), close the tab, access the site again from a bookmark or manually typed URL, and try again.
Create bookmarks for sites that require logins, and always use your bookmark to visit those sites. Even if you see a login form just waiting for you in a tab, load your bookmark instead.
Better yet, make site-specific browsers for sites that require logins to protect sensitive data, and use those sites only via their site-specific browsers. A site-specific browser enables you to turn any Web app into a standalone Mac application with its own windows and menus and Dock icon. For instance, I have a site-specific browser for Google Docs, and another for the Manymoon project collaboration site. The main site-specific browsers I know of are Fluid, which relies on Apple's WebKit and thus works like Safari, and Mozilla's Prism, which works like Firefox; both are free. As an added bonus, using site-specific browsers reduces the confusion that can occur when you have too many tabs open; it also lets you think of and interact with a Web app like any other desktop application.
Use a dedicated client for login-based sites where possible. This is merely an extension of the site-specific browser suggestion, but there are dedicated applications for certain Web sites, like Mailplane for Gmail and Waveboard for Google Wave. If you like the idea of breaking Web apps out into Mac applications, why not get extra features from a dedicated client?
Meanwhile, back at the conundrum I posed at the beginning of this article, what is a good guy who discovers such a trick to do? This isn't the same as finding a browser bug that enables a security exploit, since in that case it makes sense to report the bug privately so the browser maker can fix the bug before the bad guys exploit it. Browser makers don't always do this quickly enough, but that's the theory.

In this situation, though, the browsers are acting largely as they're supposed to, which is why tabnabbing works across multiple browsers. Similarly, the CSS browser history leak isn't new, and it too works across multiple browsers. So I suppose that full public disclosure, as a way of encouraging multiple browser makers to agree on ways of blocking these vulnerabilities, does make the most sense, especially in situations like this, where user education is the best defense. Consider yourself educated, and do what you can to encourage Apple and Mozilla and the others to prevent tabnabbing.

Still, it does make one long for the early days of the Internet when it wasn't necessary to worry about such things."
0
Optimizing Cloud Backup for Low Bandwidth

With cloud storage prices going down a growing number of SMBs start to use it for backup storage. Unfortunately, business data volume rarely fits the average Internet speed. This article provides an overview of main Internet speed challenges and reveals backup best practices.

 
LVL 14

Author Comment

by:R-Byter
ID: 34104638
Excellent effort, You just need to point a source where You get this text:

http://db.tidbits.com/article/11314

Anyway, can conficker worm be responsible for injecting this tbanabbing code into legitimate pages on web server?

Regards
0
 
LVL 3

Expert Comment

by:Johndo58
ID: 34111176
Sorry thought I had :-)
0
 
LVL 14

Author Comment

by:R-Byter
ID: 34112384
Will award You the points if no one  give any more thoughts in a day.

Regards
0

Featured Post

Master Your Team's Linux and Cloud Stack!

The average business loses $13.5M per year to ineffective training (per 1,000 employees). Keep ahead of the competition and combine in-person quality with online cost and flexibility by training with Linux Academy.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

In every aspect, security is essential for your business, and for that matter you need to always keep an eye on it. The same can be said about your computer network system too. Your computer network is prone to various malware and security threats t…
Envision that you are chipping away at another e-business site with a team of pundit developers and designers. Everything seems, by all accounts, to be going easily.
Established in 1997, Technology Architects has become one of the most reputable technology solutions companies in the country. TA have been providing businesses with cost effective state-of-the-art solutions and unparalleled service that is designed…
Email security requires an ever evolving service that stays up to date with counter-evolving threats. The Email Laundry perform Research and Development to ensure their email security service evolves faster than cyber criminals. We apply our Threat…

821 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question