Go Premium for a chance to win a PS4. Enter to Win

x
  • Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 592
  • Last Modified:

Connecting concreate class to abstract class

Hello

In below diagram where is the correct place for Parameter class. Should I connect it to an abstract class?

 uml diagram
Kind regards.
0
vileda
Asked:
vileda
  • 2
  • 2
2 Solutions
 
kris_perCommented:
I guess you want to use the Parameter class in getParameter method. Then it is related to AbstractContainer.

If AbstractContainer class has a list of Parameter objects, then it is aggregation.

If Parameter class is used only in getParameter method, then I think it is not necessary to show Parameter class in the diagram; if you want, you can relate it to AbstractContainer with a dotted line, just for a note as the design is already clear with other classes.

0
 
viledaAuthor Commented:

Should I create a AbstractParameter class that connected to AbstractContainer class.

I don't want to connect it to AbstractContainer class. Because the package which includes my Abstract Container class is highly stable. When I add a concrete class to this package it becomes more instable so that the other packages depends on this package will become relatively more stable.

This means breaking the Stable Abstraction Principle:
http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?StableAbstractionsPrinciple

What should I do now?
0
 
greyfairerCommented:
The AbstractContainer.getParameter(...) returns an int, so the Parameter object is not coupled directly to  the Abstraction.

The Parameter object is  probably only used inside methods in ConcreteContainer, so I would only link it there. Creating an AbstractParameter is also totally useless. The Concrete container and the Parameter Object should be in a concrete package.
0
 
kris_perCommented:
My understanding of what is meant by 'stable' in your comment and in the link is 'frequency of change'. I think what it means is that less changing, contract-finalized (stable) packages should be 'abstract'.

It looks like the getParameter method in AbstractContainer doesn't use Parameter class currently. I think you are trying to change it to use Parameter class. i.e. You are trying to make the 'abstract' to be 'unstable'. If you dont want this to happen, then leave the getParamter method as it is now and hence you dont need to link to the AbstractContainer.  Then Parameter class is more an internal detail (could be used inside ConcreteContainer). Then you dont need to specify the Parameter class in the diagram at all.  

You wouldn't need AbstractParameter class either. I think you should view this as a helper class rather than like a main class in the design.
0
 
greyfairerCommented:
FYI: Definition of 'stability' in OOP: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_package_metrics

0

Featured Post

Free Tool: Port Scanner

Check which ports are open to the outside world. Helps make sure that your firewall rules are working as intended.

One of a set of tools we are providing to everyone as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

  • 2
  • 2
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now