Link to home
Create AccountLog in
Avatar of ZachariaVinduska
ZachariaVinduska

asked on

Qos deployment not achieving desired results

Network setup – We are the hub to several remotes sites. Hub has 3 MB WAN connection. We host the central ERP system accessed by every remote site, as well as the central point for all email.
Testing involved one remote site with a 1024 WAN connection, all other remote sites have T1 WAN connection.
Using GRE over IPSec as well as Cisco WAAS throughout every site.
Problem – when email (no attachment size restriction), ftp, or sharepoint traffic traverse to WAN sites our ERP application (HTTP traffic) suffers timeouts.
Proposed solution – implement Qos to alleviate ERP timeouts and overall line degradation.
Set qos to mark ERP traffic as mission critical (DSCP af31) The WAAS is set to copy DSCP values.
Tried setting class to “priority bandwidth” – does not work since hub has 3MB connection and class will only be utilized when line is congested.
Set class to “percent” or “kbps” – “kbps” currently in place, dedicating 1533kbps to class marked af31
Matching packets now have a drop rate of 4 %, were as before we were not experiencing any drops.
End result is still that the ERP traffic gets degraded once the line is congested.
Desired result – Need dedicated response on line for ERP app regardless of amount of traffic that is on line.

ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Avatar of cstosgale
cstosgale
Flag of United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland image

Link to home
membership
Create a free account to see this answer
Signing up is free and takes 30 seconds. No credit card required.
See answer
Avatar of ZachariaVinduska
ZachariaVinduska

ASKER

Thanks for the response. The only problem with the bandwidth command is that it doesnt get utilized unless the line is congested. Since the Hub has a 3 MB and all the remote sites have a T1, the 3MB connection never reaches the max for the policy to take place. So we are using the "priority" command which is based off of a minumum guarantee. Here is what we have in place currently - (Note we are not marking on the remote side because the dscp value is being retained from the hub class JDE)

Hub site
policy-map JDEQOS2
 class JDE
  set dscp af31

policy-map JDEQOS-outbound
 class JDE-marked
  priority 1533

interface Multilink1
service-policy output JDEQOS-outbound

interface GigabitEthernet0/0
service-policy input JDEQOS2
------------------------------------------------
Remote site
policy-map JDEQOS-outbound
 class JDE-marked
  priority 384

interface Serial0/0/0
service-policy output JDEQOS-outbound

SOLUTION
Link to home
membership
Create a free account to see this answer
Signing up is free and takes 30 seconds. No credit card required.
Avatar of Qlemo
This question has been classified as abandoned and is being closed as part of the Cleanup Program. See my comment at the end of the question for more details.