Want to win a PS4? Go Premium and enter to win our High-Tech Treats giveaway. Enter to Win

x
?
Solved

Exchange 2003 replication bet. 2 2003 servers for backup purposes.

Posted on 2010-11-10
10
Medium Priority
?
514 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-10
I have 2 dc's running windows server 2003. 1 server is pdc running exchange 2003, which has a raid 5 and was the only one on site for quite a while. I have recently added a small server for recovery purposes which is a cheap computer just to be able to recover dc easier after corrupt os and working with backups to restore programs plus data.

2nd server is a cheap raid 1 server, where I have recently added bes. Now I want to have as easy a job as possible to recover from crash, hardware failure, etc. for data files, I am currently using robocopy as a scheduled task. for exchange, I am still looking for a solution (cheap). robocopy, will recopy the entire db which is getting big, and will never finish, nor will it ever be up to date even within half hr. (and is really not doable). Normal backups are only done once daily and taken off site.

Soooo the question, I want to replicate exchange db on server1 to server2. would exchange replication be an option? I did read that its for 5.5 to 2003 not 2 2003's.
0
Comment
Question by:JoeyTheGreat
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 4
  • 4
  • 2
10 Comments
 
LVL 96

Expert Comment

by:Lee W, MVP
ID: 34108226
If these are Enterprise versions of Exchange, then you can create a cluster.  Replication for redundancy requiers Exchange 2007 or later.
0
 

Author Comment

by:JoeyTheGreat
ID: 34108300
But a cluster is expensive no? That's why I didn't go there till now.
0
 
LVL 31

Expert Comment

by:MegaNuk3
ID: 34109537
Your cheapest option is to rely on your backups

Or extract the mailboxes to PST every day using exmerge, then you can use them to import quickly into exchange, once you have got exchange installed and running again
0
Nothing ever in the clear!

This technical paper will help you implement VMware’s VM encryption as well as implement Veeam encryption which together will achieve the nothing ever in the clear goal. If a bad guy steals VMs, backups or traffic they get nothing.

 

Author Comment

by:JoeyTheGreat
ID: 34113487
I need something automatic and at least every half hr. or so.
0
 
LVL 96

Expert Comment

by:Lee W, MVP
ID: 34113615
Do you NEED it or do you WANT it?  A need is a must have... a want is not.  A must have is worth the money... and a want is not.

Another option is to use full server replication software - but these products are expensive.  For an SBS install, it would cost about $2000 minimum.  For a non-SBS install, you're looking at closer to $6500+ MINIMUM.

An upgrade to Exchange 2007/2010 would cost you at least $2000 in Exchange license fees - EXCLUDING CALs, not to mention possible license fees for upgrading the operating systems to support the newer versions of Exchange.

You could also look into virtualization systems that provide near instant failover to a VM in the event of a primary server failure.  These solutions tend to be AT LEAST $1500 themselves and that's for the low end model, you may need/want a higher end model that could cost $2500+

Basically, if being down for 8 hours would cost your business $5000, then $2500 on a solution is probably worth it... but if being down for 8 hours only costs the business $500 in lost productivity and sales, then it's not worth it to spend so much just because you never WANT to have an e-mail outage.
0
 
LVL 31

Expert Comment

by:MegaNuk3
ID: 34114529
You can schedule exmerge to run in batch mode so it will do incremental or full extracts of all your mailboxes, that is free

As leew says, spend money on a proper solution if your business cannot afford downtime or move to a hosted solution/cloud services so your uptime is someone elses headache.
0
 
LVL 96

Expert Comment

by:Lee W, MVP
ID: 34115223
> hosted solution/cloud services so your uptime is someone elses headache.
While true, it's someone elses headache, you no longer have control over it and are potentially paying MORE over time.  There are benefits to cloud based services and there are drawbacks.  Some things are great in the cloud... others... not so much.  
0
 

Author Comment

by:JoeyTheGreat
ID: 34414364
Leew I want it for no down time and nothing lost purposes. Backups currently run only every night. Which means that until backup ends, I have only a day old copy of all the emails etc. Sooo while the maximum data I might lose is 1 day, that is also too much. And besides that, I'll have a long downtime (if server needs parts). Same goes for all files.
0
 
LVL 96

Accepted Solution

by:
Lee W, MVP earned 1000 total points
ID: 34414691
Your server runs your business - you seem to know this - so why would you have a server with less than 4 hour on-site service and/or that was out of warranty?  If you didn't get that level of service, I suggest you contact your server vendor and find out how you can add it on.

With Exchange, if you're using Outlook Cached mode, then you generally won't lose ANYTHING (or almost nothing), as the OST file should contain an exact copy of each user's Exchange Mailbox.  If the Exchange server fails, then you immediately backup the OST files (just to be safe) and get a tool to convert them to PST files.  Meanwhile, you fix the server.  There should be NO WAY a competent consultant lets you be offline without e-mail for more than a day. And ALMOST all mail systems will retry sending e-mail to you for 2-4 days and notify the sender there was a problem after 4 hours.  So if the mail system is down for 24 hours, all that "missed" mail will be delivered within a few hours of restoring it and all previous mail is in the user's OST/PST files.

Other than that, your comment changes nothing as far as I can tell.  What I said in comment 34113615 still holds true.  You need to decide how much you can afford to lose being down.  DoubleTake should cover you - but it's NOT CHEAP.  If this is so important, than the price tag won't stop you.  

Put another way, this kind of redundancy is EXPENSIVE.  For everyone.  It's just easier for big companies to spend the 5 figures needed to effectively implement such a system.
0
 

Author Comment

by:JoeyTheGreat
ID: 34767856
I am currently looking into backup assist to see if that can automatically backup and restore to second dc every 4 hrs. or so.
0

Featured Post

Free learning courses: Active Directory Deep Dive

Get a firm grasp on your IT environment when you learn Active Directory best practices with Veeam! Watch all, or choose any amount, of this three-part webinar series to improve your skills. From the basics to virtualization and backup, we got you covered.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Backups and Disaster RecoveryIn this post, we’ll look at strategies for backups and disaster recovery.
If something goes wrong with Exchange, your IT resources are in trouble.All Exchange server migration processes are not designed to be identical and though migrating email from on-premises Exchange mailbox to Cloud’s Office 365 is relatively simple…
The basic steps you have just learned will be implemented in this video. The basic steps are shown to configure an Exchange DAG in a live working Exchange Server Environment and manage the same (Exchange Server 2010 Software is used in a Windows Ser…
Exchange organizations may use the Journaling Agent of the Transport Service to archive messages going through Exchange. However, if the Transport Service is integrated with some email content management application (such as an antispam), the admini…

596 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question