• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 602
  • Last Modified:

How can I give the minimum permission?

How can I give a SQL user ONLY execute permission to a stored procedure that is in the Master DB?
0
Negash
Asked:
Negash
  • 3
  • 3
3 Solutions
 
AarthiPrabakaranCommented:


try something like this CREATE PROCEDURE dbo.usp_Demo
AS
SELECT user_name();
GO
GRANT EXECUTE ON [dbo].[usp_Demo] TO [test]
0
 
Raja Jegan RSQL Server DBA & ArchitectCommented:
>> How can I give a SQL user ONLY execute permission to a stored procedure that is in the Master DB?

Few Best practices:

1. Giving CONNECT permission to a user for master db is not recommended.
2. Instead create that procedure in some other user databases and grant CONNECT privilege to Database and EXECUTE privileges to procedure.
3. Make sure public role is revoked and guest account is disabled since all users would be able to view and access objects present in all databases.
0
 
NegashAuthor Commented:
It is not only one stored procedure that the user needs permission to. There are at least two dozen. Do I need to grant permission to each of them? Also, I would like to make sure this wouldn't give the user access to any other object in the DB?  
0
Cloud Class® Course: C++ 11 Fundamentals

This course will introduce you to C++ 11 and teach you about syntax fundamentals.

 
Raja Jegan RSQL Server DBA & ArchitectCommented:
>> It is not only one stored procedure that the user needs permission to. There are at least two dozen

Then you need to GRANT execute permission to all the required stored procedures.
In the meanwhile, why are you having user stored procedures in master database which is not a recommended approach at all.

>> Also, I would like to make sure this wouldn't give the user access to any other object in the DB?  

Revoke Public role and disable guest account.
Now granting CONNECT permissions to only required database and EXECUTE privilege on required stored procedures would suffice (it won't give access to other objects for sure)
0
 
NegashAuthor Commented:
Thank you rrjegan17! This was exactly what I wanted to do. But I have an external vendor that requested to have their stored procedures in the master db.  Their reason I think is they use a third party tool that apparently converts their existing Access based DB to SQL.  They never re-wrote their code so they are translating everything.   So now I have to figure out how to give only an execute permission without even giving public role to this user. (Is this even possible?)
0
 
NegashAuthor Commented:
I guess you have answered my question. I posted comment with refreshing the browser. I will try that. Thanks much!
0
 
Raja Jegan RSQL Server DBA & ArchitectCommented:
One more info:

"The guest user cannot be dropped, but it can be disabled by revoking its CONNECT permission. The CONNECT permission can be revoked by executing REVOKE CONNECT FROM GUEST within any database other than master or tempdb."

Guest account which has public role access cannot be REVOKED from master database and hence I don't it would work in your scenario..
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

Join & Write a Comment

Featured Post

Free Tool: Port Scanner

Check which ports are open to the outside world. Helps make sure that your firewall rules are working as intended.

One of a set of tools we are providing to everyone as a way of saying thank you for being a part of the community.

  • 3
  • 3
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now