Want to protect your cyber security and still get fast solutions? Ask a secure question today.Go Premium

x
?
Solved

Windows NTFS best file allocate unit size for a Backup-to-Disk Partition

Posted on 2010-11-19
6
Medium Priority
?
3,425 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-10
I'm configuring a 2TB partition for backup-to-disk, and normally I just take the default file allocate unit size of default, or 4096.  I'm wondering if since I'll have a small number of actual files and the files themselves will be very large, would it help performance if I set the size to be much higher than the default?  If so, would I put it at the highest of 64K?
0
Comment
Question by:jpletcher1
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
6 Comments
 
LVL 42

Accepted Solution

by:
kevinhsieh earned 252 total points
ID: 34175235
If you have a small number of large files, I would use 64K NTFS allocation blocks.
0
 
LVL 59

Assisted Solution

by:Darius Ghassem
Darius Ghassem earned 248 total points
ID: 34175239
For backup you can run the 64K option but how much performance gain are you really going to get.

http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/ssqanet/archive/2008/04/28/sql-server-2005-and-disk-drive-allocation-unit-size-to-64k-any-benefit-or-performance.aspx
0
 

Author Comment

by:jpletcher1
ID: 34175796
That link requires a login so I can't see it.  I'm not sure of the performance statistics, only that everything written by Microsoft claims the higher the size the better the performance.  Can you explain a little about what the article says?
0
Problems using Powershell and Active Directory?

Managing Active Directory does not always have to be complicated.  If you are spending more time trying instead of doing, then it's time to look at something else. For nearly 20 years, AD admins around the world have used one tool for day-to-day AD management: Hyena. Discover why

 
LVL 42

Expert Comment

by:kevinhsieh
ID: 34175807
Just hit cancel when asked to login.
0
 
LVL 59

Expert Comment

by:Darius Ghassem
ID: 34175812
Just hit cancel on the login
0
 

Author Comment

by:jpletcher1
ID: 34175889
As I read this article it seems to promote 64k block size as long as I'm not going to use compression right?  I don't see anything regarding performance so to speak.  I think I'll just go with 64k.  Thanks for the info.
0

Featured Post

Making Bulk Changes to Active Directory

Watch this video to see how easy it is to make mass changes to Active Directory from an external text file without using complicated scripts.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

I was prompted to write this article after the recent World-Wide Ransomware outbreak. For years now, System Administrators around the world have used the excuse of "Waiting a Bit" before applying Security Patch Updates. This type of reasoning to me …
This article provides a convenient collection of links to Microsoft provided Security Patches for operating systems that have reached their End of Life support cycle. Included operating systems covered by this article are Windows XP,  Windows Server…
This tutorial will walk an individual through the steps necessary to configure their installation of BackupExec 2012 to use network shared disk space. Verify that the path to the shared storage is valid and that data can be written to that location:…
This tutorial will give a short introduction and overview of Backup Exec 2012 and how to navigate and perform basic functions. Click on the Backup Exec button in the upper left corner. From here, are global settings for the application such as conne…

578 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question