Windows NTFS best file allocate unit size for a Backup-to-Disk Partition

I'm configuring a 2TB partition for backup-to-disk, and normally I just take the default file allocate unit size of default, or 4096.  I'm wondering if since I'll have a small number of actual files and the files themselves will be very large, would it help performance if I set the size to be much higher than the default?  If so, would I put it at the highest of 64K?
Who is Participating?

Improve company productivity with a Business Account.Sign Up

kevinhsiehConnect With a Mentor Commented:
If you have a small number of large files, I would use 64K NTFS allocation blocks.
Darius GhassemConnect With a Mentor Commented:
For backup you can run the 64K option but how much performance gain are you really going to get.
jpletcher1Author Commented:
That link requires a login so I can't see it.  I'm not sure of the performance statistics, only that everything written by Microsoft claims the higher the size the better the performance.  Can you explain a little about what the article says?
Making Bulk Changes to Active Directory

Watch this video to see how easy it is to make mass changes to Active Directory from an external text file without using complicated scripts.

Just hit cancel when asked to login.
Darius GhassemCommented:
Just hit cancel on the login
jpletcher1Author Commented:
As I read this article it seems to promote 64k block size as long as I'm not going to use compression right?  I don't see anything regarding performance so to speak.  I think I'll just go with 64k.  Thanks for the info.
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.