Solved

NEW COMPUTER REQUIREMENTS - for Autocad - HP Pro 3130 i7-870, 8 GB RAM & ATI V5800

Posted on 2010-11-19
3
1,195 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-10
Question: I have narrowed down our purchase of workstations for the AutoCad detailers and engineers.  These computers seem to be powerful and cost effective.  The form factor seems to be the variable that brings the price down.  We could get a z400 with Xeon processor, however they are priced well over a $1000 more than the Pro series for similar specs.  Over the years we have purchased HP xw series workstations, however we rarely upgraded them except for maxing out the ram to 3.5 GB (for XP 32-bit).

If possible, please let me know any solid advice that you have for these machines for AutoCad and AutoDesk Revit requirements.


HP Pro 3130 - VS792UT
http://h71016.www7.hp.com/dstore/MiddleFrame.asp?page=config&ProductLineId=429&FamilyId=3284&BaseId=33873&oi=E9CED&BEID=19701&SBLID=

Core i7-870 / 2.93
Windows 7 Pro - 64
RAM 4 GB - DDR3 PC3-10600 (UPGRADED TO 8 GB)
500 GB -  Sata 300 - 7200 RPM
CHIPSET - Intel H57 Express

Remove stock graphics card.  Install ATI FirePro V5800 other similar NVIDIA card.

Any suggestions for similarly priced workstations would be good also, but please advise on the above box also.

Thank you!

mug

0
Comment
Question by:Kris Montgomery
3 Comments
 
LVL 3

Expert Comment

by:mdpowell71
ID: 34177537
For our AutoCAD users we maxed out to 8GB RAM and installed Nvidia 9500 series video cards. windows Vista Enterprise.
0
 
LVL 6

Author Comment

by:Kris Montgomery
ID: 34178070
Is there any more information that anyone would need to help me?

I know many of you all have more experience in building systems for graphic and processor intensive programs.  I could use the advice.

Thanks!

mug
0
 
LVL 11

Accepted Solution

by:
gikkel earned 500 total points
ID: 34192029
Typically true workstations are built using the same type of board for a server with a few minor adjustments to allow for high-end graphics.  Although HP Pro 3130 series uses the Intel Core series, you should expect a workstation to come with a Xeon or Opteron processor.  It should also have at least 2 cpu sockets (hence the necessity for a Xeon).  Workstations will also let you upgrade to a ridiculous amount of ram (96+ gb), with support for ecc.  Workstations should also use a professional video card, mainly the nvidia quadro or ati fire series.  There are major architectural differences that justify the increase in price.  

However, since I'm an engineer I use software that can benefit from the raw power of a workstation.  It is highly dependant on your user.  I personally will NEVER go back to a desktop setup.  As for the price, I always build my own...and the decrease in price is astounding.  If that's not an option and price is a major concern, stick with what you picked and do the upgrades immediately. Other than that, you'll notice the difference between an entry-level workstation and a desktop is that they offer a low-end professional graphics card - and since you're going to upgrade anyway, you'd be better suited with a desktop.

My typical workload - Windows 7 Ultimate x64 running 3-5 sessions of AutoCAD Civil 3D, ArcGIS, 5-10 Excel files, 10-20 Word docs, Access, HEC-RAS, Opera, Outlook, Photoshop, Google Earth, Acrobat, IE, VMware, and more.  I have yet to see a hiccup - but I have a very, very, very sick setup.

If you have the option of building your own, there's no reason you couldn't start with a workstation base and gradually upgrade if necessary.  If you buy the right parts, it would last upwards of 5 years, and even then could be cycled down the chain.  However, if you're anything like me, you'll want the best of the best...and it starts to get really expensive.

So, to stop rambling and answer your question - what you picked is fine, but with the newer versions available in 64-bit, I'd suggest more than 8gb of ram (unfortunately thats the max in that desktop).  The H57 chipset is ok, I've used it for an office manager primarily using access - and it should run Autocad just fine.  

As long as your users are just running a single instance of revit, it'll run fine - Autocad has yet to take advantage of multiple processors (other than regens/redraw).  If, however, they will be performing intensive rendering tasks, don't expect ultra fast results.  The video card you picked is great - from the price vantage much better than a similar nvidia card.
0

Featured Post

Is Your Active Directory as Secure as You Think?

More than 75% of all records are compromised because of the loss or theft of a privileged credential. Experts have been exploring Active Directory infrastructure to identify key threats and establish best practices for keeping data safe. Attend this month’s webinar to learn more.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Suggested Solutions

Article by: SHIELD1
The 5 R's 1. Repair 2. Restore 3. Reinstall 4. Remote admin 5. Run away OK so I'm not the most skilled engineer around but I definitely have an abundance of experience: electronic repairs since I was 13 and PC and computer hardware repair…
Concerto provides fully managed cloud services and the expertise to provide an easy and reliable route to the cloud. Our best-in-class solutions help you address the toughest IT challenges, find new efficiencies and deliver the best application expe…
With Secure Portal Encryption, the recipient is sent a link to their email address directing them to the email laundry delivery page. From there, the recipient will be required to enter a user name and password to enter the page. Once the recipient …

932 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

13 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now