Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of GamesNET2
GamesNET2Flag for United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

asked on

Shared Contacts Advice

Hi there,

I have a client who has around 4000 contacts they would like to share amongst their employees. they currently all use macs, and use part of google apps for their calendar?

i wanted to know if anyone had a good way of sharing these 4000 contacts between all of them.

i have tried -

Address book server (under 1 user) on mac server - Extremely slow (is this normal?)
Daylite - too expensive.

Many thanks for any help,
SOLUTION
Avatar of Blake_1
Blake_1

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
SOLUTION
Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
SOLUTION
Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
SOLUTION
Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
SOLUTION
Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
This is a kludge, but Address Book Server can perform satisfactorily as long as no single shared address book is > aprox. 1,200 entries.

If you split your 4,000 item address book into 3 or 4 address books, the performance will be OK. Users will search "All Contacts" so the division will be transparent. Unless the books are split on some logical basis you want to maintain, it also would not matter which shared book new items were added to.

Not ideal, but functional.

Also, as noted above, LDAP will also work fine for a read only address book.
Avatar of GamesNET2

ASKER

Not quite answered but helpful