Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of neysa95
neysa95

asked on

Windows 7 32-bit or Windows 7 64-bit and FileMaker Pro 9

I am buying a new computer which will have windows 7 Home Premium installed on it. Im not sure of which version it will have yet.  When I contacted FileMaker customer support they told me that 9 would not run on either version and I should upgrade to FileMaker 11 which would run on the 32-bit version.  Then I read that if I upgraded to Windows 7 Professional I would be able to run a virtual XP system on the computer.  When I asked FM customer support about that, they said that it wouldn't work on that part of the OS.

I hope this doesn't sound really lame, but I don't know what to do or who to believe.  I know there have been some questions about this in the past, but I would like to know if anyone has used FM9 and if it worked on either system and if they had the Home version of Windows 7 or the Profession version.
Avatar of graye
graye
Flag of United States of America image

Although I have no direct relevant experience, I just can't image you'd have problems running the software in the XP Mode.  After all, that's why they created it.... to be compatible with WinXP!

Here is something to try.... download the Virtual PC application (I assume you're currently running WinXP?) and see if a virtualized version of XP can run FileMaker Pro 9.  That way, you can test it yourself on your current system.

Let us know if you need help finding/installing Virtual PC on you current system
FM could be troublesome in the way that it connects to the database. If you are in a domain environment I would say you have a low probability of getting it to work. The trouble with database driven programs is the way they connect using a virtual ethernet on a virtual IP.

Localized installs with local databases are generally fine.

HTH,
Ken
Avatar of neysa95
neysa95

ASKER

My preseent computer is running on XP Home Edition Version 2002 Service Pack 3 which I do not think would work with Virtual PC 2007 from what I read on the Windows website.  I am running FileMaker9 on my home pc and do not share files with any other person or via a vitual ethernet on a virtual IP.  Perhaps I should just leave things as they are with my old computer (which is 4 years old) and just increase the amount of RAM on it.
Sure, Virtual PC runs fine WinXP SP3....   Where did you read otherwise?
Avatar of neysa95

ASKER

I read what I thought it said about virtual PC on the Microsoft website.  I think that I may try to add more RAM to my present pc and stick with FileMaker 9.  Upgrades here in the UK are very expensive.  Ram seems to be much cheaper.  
SOLUTION
Avatar of ThomDroz
ThomDroz

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Avatar of neysa95

ASKER

Thanks for your comments on FileMaker.  Of all the software I use, their tech support is by far the most unhelpful.  I won't go into details, but the last time I upgraded from an early version of FM to 9,  I only found the answer to my problem by using  one of their forums.  I would have expected the people at customer support to know more than they did.  I am sure that version 11 has lots more bells and whistles, but 9 does all I want it to do.  I share a data base with someone in the USA and having FM9 means that I can see her data on my pc when she sends me a file.  As they always say, I wouldn't start from here, but that's where I am.  So thanks for your advice.  As a temporary solution I am buying more RAM and having it installed.  Buying a new pc when money is tight, is not a very good idea, unless all else fails.
And to all those other very thoughtful experts, thanks for your comments too!
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
This question has been classified as abandoned and is being closed as part of the Cleanup Program.  See my comment at the end of the question for more details.