Solved

Why would brand new LTO3 tapes hold less and write/read slower than old tapes in current inventory?

Posted on 2011-02-10
6
1,204 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-11
I'm using Backup Exec 11d (Rev 7170, HotFix 37, Svc Pk 5, HotFix 70 using BE drivers) and a Quantum Superloader3 w/ Quantum drive (ver 2181).  All new media (Quantum and Fuji) I use will give me "Media Full" between 232GB and 308GB while media created in 2009 will get 'full' between 438GB and 496GB backing up the same data using the same jobs.  My weekend backup (just over 1TB) should be using 3 tapes and now is up to 5.  One of my nightly backups typically (on old tapes) runs 4 hours. Last night on new tapes... 7 hours 20 minutes which ran over my next backup job start time.  I have xTalk logs for Device Health and write/read full tape on a 'New' tape.  I need to run write/read full tape on an old tape for comparison.
Any help, greatly appreciated. Thanks.
0
Comment
Question by:cfox869
6 Comments
 
LVL 10

Expert Comment

by:scriven_j
ID: 34869983
LTO 3 tapes should be 400GB capacity (800GB using compression) so this is a bit of a strange one.

Probably worth updating the Quantum Superloader firmware.

Did you do an erase or anything on the tapes before you started using them?

0
 
LVL 10

Expert Comment

by:scriven_j
ID: 34869990
I use Netbackup and LTO3, but tapes show as full at around 600GB.
0
 
LVL 10

Expert Comment

by:scriven_j
ID: 34870005
I have just looked historically and some say they are full as low as 480GB and as high as 728GB (we use compression) - so if you halved those (assuming you aren't using compression), the range is pretty similar to what you are seeing.....
0
[Webinar] Disaster Recovery and Cloud Management

Learn from Unigma and CloudBerry industry veterans which providers are best for certain use cases and how to lower cloud costs, how to grow your Managed Services practice in IaaS clouds, and how to utilize public cloud for Disaster Recovery

 
LVL 16

Expert Comment

by:Gerald Connolly
ID: 34874497
LTO2 = 200GB Uncompressed
LTO3 = 400GB Uncompressed

If you are now only getting 200GB on a tape are you sure they are LTO-3 tapes?

What does BackupExec think they are?
0
 
LVL 20

Accepted Solution

by:
SelfGovern earned 500 total points
ID: 34881052
Have you tried to re-use one of those old tapes that had gotten over 400GB, to see if you still get over 400GB on it?  If not, my expectation is that you either have a tape head that has been used to the extent of its useful life, or, that it's very dirty.

Each time the tape drive encounters a write error, it flags that area of the tape as bad and writes the current block over again.   If this happens enough, you notice it as a decrease in tape capacity.   It doesn't sound like you're seeing the cleaning light, so the most likely cause of this problem would be a used-up head.

It's also possible that the new tapes are fairly "dirty" -- it's common for new tapes to have loose bits of magnetic particles on them... cheap media or a bad batch will have more loose bits than better-quality media.   And if that isn't enough, new media is, essentially, a cleaning tape... so if you haven't used new media in quite a while, this new set may be scraping bits off the head and the loose material may be causing errors that contribute to soft write errors.

SO -- If Quantum has any kind of diagnostics, I suggest you download and run some tests on the drive and the media.   That should give you more hard information about what the error condition might be.   You can also usually look in your backup application under the tape properties to see what kind of errors you've been getting.

Other possibilities: Tapes accidentally formatted as LTO-2.   Tapes with LTO-2 bar-code labels, which will cause a library to read and report them as LTO-2 media.  (rarely) LTO-2 tapes mislabeled at the factory.
0
 

Author Comment

by:cfox869
ID: 34888736
Update: Quantum is replacing the drive after reviewing the xTalk logs for Device Health and Full tape write/read on both "New Media" and "old known good media".

SelfGovern: Your assessment is correct.  "tape head that has been used to the extent of its useful life"  Thank you.

The attached file shows the tape capacity decline from March 2010.  And you can see the same decline from October 2008.  The tape capacity went back to 'normal' after the drive was replaced in Sept 2009.  



Date-and-Capacity-Page-2.jpg
0

Featured Post

NAS Cloud Backup Strategies

This article explains backup scenarios when using network storage. We review the so-called “3-2-1 strategy” and summarize the methods you can use to send NAS data to the cloud

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Replication has always been one of those technologies that people run scared from. The main reason is usually cost. When you think of replication, your mind drifts to solutions that replicate from one disk frame to another using block level technolo…
How to update Firmware and Bios in Dell Equalogic PS6000 Arrays and Hard Disks firmware update.
To efficiently enable the rotation of USB drives for backups, storage pools need to be created. This way no matter which USB drive is installed, the backups will successfully write without any administrative intervention. Multiple USB devices need t…
This tutorial will walk an individual through the process of configuring basic necessities in order to use the 2010 version of Data Protection Manager. These include storage, agents, and protection jobs. Launch Data Protection Manager from the deskt…

895 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

11 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now