?
Solved

switching server from SCSI to SATA hard drives

Posted on 2011-02-14
11
Medium Priority
?
659 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-11
I have some older servers with SCSI hard drives. The computing power of the servers is still good but SCSI hard drives have become alot more expensive than SATA. These servers are a poweredge 2650 and 1750. What do I need to buy to be able to run SATA drives in these servers? I'm assuming a PCI-X SATA controller, but what else?
0
Comment
Question by:knfitz
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 3
  • 3
  • 3
  • +2
11 Comments
 
LVL 96

Expert Comment

by:Lee W, MVP
ID: 34889847
I'm fairly certain the backplanes of these systems were never designed to support SATA drives.  You MIGHT be able to mount one or two in some spot (don't have one handy to check), but in general, you're not going to be able to do it.  Considering the age of these systems, whether they are hardware spec capable isn't that important to me, I'd retire them or use them as is for MINIMAL tasks since they are more likely to fail sooner than later.
0
 

Author Comment

by:knfitz
ID: 34889856
so i would need a new backplane? Is that the part the drives plug into?
0
 
LVL 13

Expert Comment

by:IT-Monkey-Dave
ID: 34889877
As leew said you don't have any option to just replace all the SCSIs to SATAs due to the design of the drive backplanes.  You could of course throw in a RAID controller with an external SATA-based drive array.  Internally though, you're probably stuck with SCSI.
0
Ransomware Attacks Keeping You Up at Night?

Will your organization be ransomware's next victim?  The good news is that these attacks are predicable and therefore preventable. Learn more about how you can  stop a ransomware attacks before encryption takes place with our Ransomware Prevention Kit!

 
LVL 96

Expert Comment

by:Lee W, MVP
ID: 34889881
Yes, that's the part that the drives plug into, but I'm 99% certain the 1750 doesn't have one that supports SATA, and I'm 99.99% certain the 2650 doesn't either.
0
 
LVL 13

Expert Comment

by:IT-Monkey-Dave
ID: 34889888
Yeah, you'd need a new SATA backplane designed specifically for that system.  Such a backplane may not exist.  You'd also need a SATA RAID controller.
0
 

Author Comment

by:knfitz
ID: 34889902
I understand. Does anyone know of an inexpensive solution for an external SATA drive array and Raid controller?
0
 
LVL 13

Expert Comment

by:IT-Monkey-Dave
ID: 34889936
I've had excellent luck with Areca RAID controllers and their external SATA RAID enclosures.  They're reasonably priced and seem very reliable.  There are of course lots of other choices.
0
 
LVL 96

Accepted Solution

by:
Lee W, MVP earned 2000 total points
ID: 34889954
A few years back I put in a small 4 drive enclosure at a client using a Multi-lane SATA cable and RAID controller.  Worked fine for me... the IT guy they later hired to do most things in house has been a different story... but I'm not sure it's not just him.

http://www.addonics.com/products/raid_system/mst4.asp
0
 
LVL 33

Expert Comment

by:PowerEdgeTech
ID: 34890005
Not here for points, just to confirm what leew already has said ... there is no conversion possible for the 1750/2650 to a SATA backplane.  These long precede the widespread use of SATA/SAS in an enterprise environment.

If you can, go with an LSI controller, as they historically have a much better chance of working in your 2650 than some of the other controller brands.
0
 
LVL 47

Expert Comment

by:David
ID: 34894432
Are you comparing desktop SATA disks?  You need to use enterprise class, which costs much more money, and have much worse performance, especially when it comes to the type of I/O models common to servers .. multiple streams and IOPs-oriented.

So friendly advice, before you even think of going SATA, you better at least look at enterprise class disk pricing, and then also look at I/Os per second in the specs, NOT throughput numbers.  Make sure you are comparing more than cost/GB.
0
 

Author Comment

by:knfitz
ID: 34897111
I'm setting up a network for 20 end users. Do you think using desktop SATA will make any difference with that? I can understand if I had alot of users that were going to be hitting these servers.
0

Featured Post

Ransomware: The New Cyber Threat & How to Stop It

This infographic explains ransomware, type of malware that blocks access to your files or your systems and holds them hostage until a ransom is paid. It also examines the different types of ransomware and explains what you can do to thwart this sinister online threat.  

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

Moving your enterprise fax infrastructure from in-house fax machines and servers to the cloud makes sense — from both an efficiency and productivity standpoint. But does migrating to a cloud fax solution mean you will no longer be able to send or re…
Stuck in voice control mode on your Amazon Firestick?  Here is how to turn it off!!!
In this video, Percona Director of Solution Engineering Jon Tobin discusses the function and features of Percona Server for MongoDB. How Percona can help Percona can help you determine if Percona Server for MongoDB is the right solution for …
In this video, Percona Solutions Engineer Barrett Chambers discusses some of the basic syntax differences between MySQL and MongoDB. To learn more check out our webinar on MongoDB administration for MySQL DBA: https://www.percona.com/resources/we…

766 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question