Solved

download speed from NY to LA

Posted on 2011-02-14
6
370 Views
Last Modified: 2012-06-27
I am a  testing a server in New York datacenter and I tried to download a (135 Mb) file from a server in Los Angeles.

From New York  I am getting at 451.99KB/s and takes me about 14 minutes to download the file. From a server in different datacenter in Los Angles I get about 6657.31KB/s and takes me about 22 seconds to  download the file.

I was just curious if the speed I'm getting from New York to Los Angeles is good? Or is my download rate slow?
0
Comment
Question by:ShadowColossus
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 3
  • 3
6 Comments
 
LVL 10

Expert Comment

by:Mez4343
ID: 34892364
Download speeds will vary from either Server since they are different access points. The most likely problem is that the first LA server is on a slow connection or experiencing heavy traffic and its not an issue with your NY connection to the internet.

Bottom line is you can only verify 1 access point to another. The idea that 2 servers existing in the same sort of location should have the same download speed is not guaranteed.

To verify your NY download speed to LA indepenently, I would run a Speedtest. I use http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest?java=1 and they have a LA server for you to test.
0
 

Author Comment

by:ShadowColossus
ID: 34892654
Hello,

I tried the speedtest from Washington and got a 70Mb/sec download 40Mb/sec upload on a server in LA. If I try a server in NY I get about 104Mb/sec and 64Mb/sec upload.


I think there is some confusion. I am trying to download a file from Los Angles. From another server in LA (different datacener) I could download the file in about 22 secs. If I try to download the file from NY it takes me about 6 minutes. I  am not trying to download a file from two different servers in the same location.


0
 
LVL 10

Expert Comment

by:Mez4343
ID: 34899405
yea i understand that you are not trying to download at the same time.

Is this what your doing?

1) NY machine1 -> LA Server 1 = 22 sec
2) NY machine1 -> LA Server 2 (different datacenter) = 14-22 minutes

If yes, my point is just because both servers are in same general location (LA area) you cant expect similar download speeds. Each datacenter has their own bandwidth and traffic situations that will affect your download speed.

You may want to run a traceroute on each download to see if there are different paths.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc779346(v=ws.10).aspx

If the paths are similar, then the problem is the LA server on download#2 above
0
Technology Partners: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

 

Author Comment

by:ShadowColossus
ID: 34900476

Hello,

This is how I'm downloading

1) NY Machine -> LA server 1 = 6 minutes
2) LA server 2 (diff datacenter) -> LA server 1= 22 seconds

The file is 135 Mb. Is 6 minutes download a good speed? Traceroute from both paths are decent (about 80 ms between NY and LA).


0
 
LVL 10

Accepted Solution

by:
Mez4343 earned 250 total points
ID: 34900717
135MB at 6 minutes (about 452 KB/s) is not great but it seems that you are comparing 2 different things.

Your NY machine got a 70 Mb/s download to Washington when running the speedtest which is good.

So the NY -> LA Server1 of 6 minutes could be an issue with bandwidth/traffic on LA server1 but comparing that to the LA server2 -> LA server1 download cant really be be compared equally because 1) they are totally differnt End points and 2) the physical location is much less.

hope this helps.

0
 

Author Comment

by:ShadowColossus
ID: 34975756
Thanks for your help Mez4343 I will look into this and let you know, I also been looking at http://www.ipbalance.com/traffic-analysis/throughput/104-tcp-throughput-calculation-formula.html for tcp throughput.
0

Featured Post

Independent Software Vendors: We Want Your Opinion

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem.   Tips on how to secure IoT devices, even the dumbest ones, so they can't be used as part of a DDoS botnet.  Use PRTG Network Monitor as one of the building blocks, to detect unusual…
When it comes to security, there are always trade-offs between security and convenience/ease of administration. This article examines some of the main pros and cons of using key authentication vs password authentication for hosting an SFTP server.
In this video we outline the Physical Segments view of NetCrunch network monitor. By following this brief how-to video, you will be able to learn how NetCrunch visualizes your network, how granular is the information collected, as well as where to f…
Monitoring a network: why having a policy is the best policy? Michael Kulchisky, MCSE, MCSA, MCP, VTSP, VSP, CCSP outlines the enormous benefits of having a policy-based approach when monitoring medium and large networks. Software utilized in this v…
Suggested Courses

717 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question