Link to home
Start Free TrialLog in
Avatar of jjoz
jjozFlag for Australia

asked on

The cost benefits analysis of Data Replication technology for Shared Storage in DR site (SAN based vs. 3rd party VMware application)

Hi All,

I am investigating the of which one is the most preferable choice for DR environment ?
###between SAN based replication technology or 3rd party application (Veeam Backup and replication or VMware Site Recovery mgr.)

my current situation is that I have running mostly virtual environment

production environment that is mixed of HP DL 380 and Blade servers with EMC Clariion CX4-500 FC-SAN
planning for DR environment that uses the same server model but still thinking of which SAN technology that we could use for the replication between the two sites ?

the DR site is not necessarily to be as fast as the current production and the SAN doesn't have to be EMC

Any comments would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks.
Avatar of Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert PRO / EE Fellow/British Beekeeper)
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert PRO / EE Fellow/British Beekeeper)
Flag of United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland image

SAN based replication is easier, but more expensive, less involved technically.

You can use Veeam Backup and Replication, what is the speed of the WAN (data) link between the sites?

Do you have a 1Gbe circuit?
Avatar of jjoz

ASKER

the WAN speed is 10 MB/s between them.
That's very slow. Does anything else go over that link or can you use all 10 MB/s for DR?
Avatar of jjoz

ASKER

yes that is dedicated only for DR replication from my production, initially all data can / must be seeded (copied) using the local speed and then the hardware is moved out to the DR site over the weekend period.
Avatar of jjoz

ASKER

Actually after doing some research around,

with the HP left hand VSA - http://h18006.www1.hp.com/products/storage/software/vsa/trial/index.html I can deploy that on top of other SAN hardware between prod - DR and then implement software replication (sounds complex to troubleshoot later on).

with the same brand of SAN from EMC, maybe just get the smaller Clariion CX4-200 to replicate it between the 10 MB WAN link after the initial in site copy is a good idea at least.
Avatar of jjoz

ASKER

ok, so now my management has approved to use the 1 GB dark fibre to the link between sites :-)
SOLUTION
Avatar of Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert PRO / EE Fellow/British Beekeeper)
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert PRO / EE Fellow/British Beekeeper)
Flag of United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland image

Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Avatar of jjoz

ASKER

"SAN based replication, you've got no service issues affecting VM servers."
hm.. i thought that by implementing the SAN based replication the VM state is in "crash consistent" since the SAN based replication doesn't quiesce the VM gracefully ?
ASKER CERTIFIED SOLUTION
Link to home
membership
This solution is only available to members.
To access this solution, you must be a member of Experts Exchange.
Start Free Trial
Avatar of jjoz

ASKER

ah.. so yes, I was thinking to use VSS aware application/hypervisor layer replication using Veeam for my need,
thanks for your thought and comments mate,

i'll discuss it with my management.
Avatar of jjoz

ASKER

many thanks !
No problems, good luck. Be careful with the VSS.....Speak to EMC about a demo license for 30 days, and test SAN to replicatication against Veeam Replication.

any issues, I'm around here....
Avatar of jjoz

ASKER

sure, glad to hear that Mr. Hancock