Solved

NetApp SAN Choice

Posted on 2011-02-15
6
985 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-11
We are evaluating a NetApp storage appliance; particularly the FAS2040. We've come to a cross road in our decision to go with SAS or SATA drives. We're running a medium sized business SQL, Exchange, and general file services. Is the speed of a SAS drive worth the additional expense or should I save my money for other areas and just stick with SATA disks?

Any thoughts about deduplication of data on our production SAN through NetApp?

Thanks in advance!
0
Comment
Question by:pitchford
[X]
Welcome to Experts Exchange

Add your voice to the tech community where 5M+ people just like you are talking about what matters.

  • Help others & share knowledge
  • Earn cash & points
  • Learn & ask questions
  • 3
  • 2
6 Comments
 
LVL 120

Assisted Solution

by:Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2)
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2) earned 250 total points
ID: 34903329
Many of our clients are using DeDupe and NFS on NetApps now, rather than iSCSI and creating LUNs.

They tend to use SATA for off-site DR with Snap Mirror, than use for production, because of performance, SAS is used for NFS/iSCSI VMware volumes for virtual machines, SQL, Exchange.

But they use standard SATA to provide File Services via CIFs.

So high performing VMs are on SAS.
0
 
LVL 42

Accepted Solution

by:
paulsolov earned 250 total points
ID: 34903341
For SQL and Exchange I would opt for the SAS drives.  Although for a smaller company SATA may work the IOPS and future requirements may give you performance bottlenecks.  

In the future you could always add a DS14 shelf with 14 1TB drives for CIFS or some of the low IOPS virtual machines.

I just finished a project today and deduplication is about 50% on a volume with application servers and 40% on CIFS (lots of CAD drawing nd binary files that don't dedupe very well.  On regular shares we get about 50-60).  Typically deduplication is in the range of 30-60 percent.  

Will you be running SQL and Exchange in a VM or physical?

0
 
LVL 42

Assisted Solution

by:paulsolov
paulsolov earned 250 total points
ID: 34903457
@hanccoka:  I spoke to a several Netapp engineers that came to us for a debriefing.  Going forward Netapp may be pushing iSCSI for VMs due to multipath capability and the ability to run more sessions in an etherchannel or LAG. Interestingly the tech stated that if we're using NFS we should probably sell it with vRanger for the file level restore vs selling flexclone which is not cheap
0
Threat Trends for MSPs to Watch

See the findings.
Despite its humble beginnings, phishing has come a long way since those first crudely constructed emails. Today, phishing sites can appear and disappear in the length of a coffee break, and it takes more than a little know-how to keep your clients secure.

 
LVL 3

Author Comment

by:pitchford
ID: 34906049
paulsolov- Our intent is to run SQL and Exchange in the VM.

After reading these comments I believe we may separate our file shares (approx 500 GB) on SAS drives and leave the VM files on SAS.

Should I also consider putting our MDFs/LDFs and Exchange data stores outside the VMDK (direclty on a SAS share)?

My intent for using FC is requirements placed for Cisco Call Manager virtualization. Apparently Cisco currently requires FC SANs and when we get ready to migrate our VoIP network I don't want to have to reengineer our SAN...
0
 
LVL 120

Assisted Solution

by:Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2)
Andrew Hancock (VMware vExpert / EE MVE^2) earned 250 total points
ID: 34906071
@paulsolov: Maybe that's across the pond, we've always deployed NetApp FC or iSCSI solutions, but NetApp here in the UK, push NFS very heavily to clients. (maybe due to the cost of NFS license maybe!)
0
 
LVL 42

Expert Comment

by:paulsolov
ID: 34908001
We've been doing a lot of NFS as well but long term plans are to go with iSCSI
0

Featured Post

Save the day with this special offer from ATEN!

Save 30% on the CV211 using promo code EXPERTS30 now through April 30th. The ATEN CV211 connects a laptop directly to any server allowing you instant access to perform data maintenance and local operations, for quick troubleshooting, updating, service and repair.

Question has a verified solution.

If you are experiencing a similar issue, please ask a related question

When rebooting a vCenters 6.0 and try to connect using vSphere Client we get this issue "Invalid URL: The hostname could not parsed." When we get this error we need to do some changes in the vCenter advanced settings to fix the issue.
Many businesses neglect disaster recovery and treat it as an after-thought. I can tell you first hand that data will be lost, hard drives die, servers will be hacked, and careless (or malicious) employees can ruin your data.
Teach the user how to install log collectors and how to configure ESXi 5.5 for remote logging Open console session and mount vCenter Server installer: Install vSphere Core Dump Collector: Install vSphere Syslog Collector: Open vSphere Client: Config…
Teach the user how to join ESXi hosts to Active Directory domains Open vSphere Client: Join ESXi host to AD domain: Verify ESXi computer account in AD: Configure permissions for domain user in ESXi: Test domain user login to ESXi host:

732 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question