Solved

Storage cluster?

Posted on 2011-02-16
3
693 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-11
I'm needing to create shared storage for my SQL Server cluster.  We do not want a SAN due to it's cost and complexity.  Rather I want to create a storage cluster using a pair of servers with direct attached storage (RAID 10).  What is the best way to get this done?  Performance and disk IO matter alot, so it needs to be fast.

It would look like this:

Server #1 + 14TB [Primary node]
Server #2 + 14TB [Hot Standby node]

**In an emergency Server #2 seamlessly picks up the load
0
Comment
Question by:Phil5780
3 Comments
 

Author Comment

by:Phil5780
ID: 34912086
Is Windows Storage Server 2008 able to provide clustering like this?
0
 
LVL 47

Accepted Solution

by:
dlethe earned 250 total points
ID: 34912977
I am going to assume active/passive ... because active-active, i.e, both systems reading and writing to the same volume at the same time is going to destroy your budget.

Some options are ...
1) Get an older PC and load X64 Solaris or Nexenta on it, and use the native zfs software-RAID. It is much superior to RAID1 in reliability, performance, and data integrity.  Then set up the O/S to present the shares as iSCSI target(s).

2) External FC used RAID subsystem. Lots of stuff on ebay, especially for fibre channel-based RAID. Stuff that went for $25K++ 5 years ago are in the $1000 range.
0
 
LVL 55

Assisted Solution

by:andyalder
andyalder earned 250 total points
ID: 34914906
>Is Windows Storage Server 2008 able to provide clustering like this?

It can but it would cost more than a shared SAS storage box. You'd be far better off with a Dell MD3000 or HP MSA2000sa.

For example from HP side -

Dual controller SAS attached storage box...
1 * AW593A dual controller P2000 £5,750.00
4 * SAS HBAs 4 * £125 = £500
12 * 600GB 15K disks 12 * £387.83 = £4656
Total £10900

Vs
Two servers for storage (without software)
2 * ML350 entry level servers £2100
24 * 600GB 15K disks 24 * £373 = £8952
(sundries omitted)
Total £11052

Near enough the same price but I haven't added enough disks. For the dual-server configuration you have to add twice as many disks as you have to add to the dual controller SAS (or iSCSI) connected SAN. Plus you have to install and maintain the OS on your storage servers whereas it's just firmware on the SAS attached storage boxes.
0

Featured Post

Save on storage to protect fatherhood memories

You're the dad who has everything. This Father's Day, make sure your family memories are protected. My Passport Ultra has automatic backup and password protection to keep your cherished photos and videos safe. With up to 3TB, you have plenty of room to hold the adventures ahead.

Join & Write a Comment

I was supporting a handful of Windows 2008 (non-R2) 2 node clusters with shared quorum disks. Some had SQL 2008 installed and some were just a vendor application that we supported. For the purposes of this article it doesn’t really matter which so w…
Sometimes drives fill up and we don't know why.  If you don't understand the best way to use the tools available, you may end up being stumped as to why your drive says it's not full when you have no space left!  Here's how you can find out...
This tutorial will walk an individual through the steps necessary to configure their installation of BackupExec 2012 to use network shared disk space. Verify that the path to the shared storage is valid and that data can be written to that location:…
To efficiently enable the rotation of USB drives for backups, storage pools need to be created. This way no matter which USB drive is installed, the backups will successfully write without any administrative intervention. Multiple USB devices need t…

758 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

18 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now