Storage cluster?

Posted on 2011-02-16
Medium Priority
Last Modified: 2012-05-11
I'm needing to create shared storage for my SQL Server cluster.  We do not want a SAN due to it's cost and complexity.  Rather I want to create a storage cluster using a pair of servers with direct attached storage (RAID 10).  What is the best way to get this done?  Performance and disk IO matter alot, so it needs to be fast.

It would look like this:

Server #1 + 14TB [Primary node]
Server #2 + 14TB [Hot Standby node]

**In an emergency Server #2 seamlessly picks up the load
Question by:Phil5780

Author Comment

ID: 34912086
Is Windows Storage Server 2008 able to provide clustering like this?
LVL 47

Accepted Solution

David earned 1000 total points
ID: 34912977
I am going to assume active/passive ... because active-active, i.e, both systems reading and writing to the same volume at the same time is going to destroy your budget.

Some options are ...
1) Get an older PC and load X64 Solaris or Nexenta on it, and use the native zfs software-RAID. It is much superior to RAID1 in reliability, performance, and data integrity.  Then set up the O/S to present the shares as iSCSI target(s).

2) External FC used RAID subsystem. Lots of stuff on ebay, especially for fibre channel-based RAID. Stuff that went for $25K++ 5 years ago are in the $1000 range.
LVL 56

Assisted Solution

andyalder earned 1000 total points
ID: 34914906
>Is Windows Storage Server 2008 able to provide clustering like this?

It can but it would cost more than a shared SAS storage box. You'd be far better off with a Dell MD3000 or HP MSA2000sa.

For example from HP side -

Dual controller SAS attached storage box...
1 * AW593A dual controller P2000 £5,750.00
4 * SAS HBAs 4 * £125 = £500
12 * 600GB 15K disks 12 * £387.83 = £4656
Total £10900

Two servers for storage (without software)
2 * ML350 entry level servers £2100
24 * 600GB 15K disks 24 * £373 = £8952
(sundries omitted)
Total £11052

Near enough the same price but I haven't added enough disks. For the dual-server configuration you have to add twice as many disks as you have to add to the dual controller SAS (or iSCSI) connected SAN. Plus you have to install and maintain the OS on your storage servers whereas it's just firmware on the SAS attached storage boxes.

Featured Post

Has Powershell sent you back into the Stone Age?

If managing Active Directory using Windows Powershell® is making you feel like you stepped back in time, you are not alone.  For nearly 20 years, AD admins around the world have used one tool for day-to-day AD management: Hyena. Discover why.

Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

Join & Write a Comment

This article provides a convenient collection of links to Microsoft provided Security Patches for operating systems that have reached their End of Life support cycle. Included operating systems covered by this article are Windows XP,  Windows Server…
In this article, we will discuss how you can secure Active Directory using free tools, and how you can choose a safe and secure Active Directory security auditing tool.
This tutorial will give a short introduction and overview of Backup Exec 2012 and how to navigate and perform basic functions. Click on the Backup Exec button in the upper left corner. From here, are global settings for the application such as conne…
This Micro Tutorial will teach you how to reformat your flash drive. Sometimes your flash drive may have issues carrying files so this will completely restore it to manufacturing settings. Make sure to backup all files before reformatting. This w…
Suggested Courses

587 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question