Want to protect your cyber security and still get fast solutions? Ask a secure question today.Go Premium

x
  • Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 1270
  • Last Modified:

Full-text search in a view returns different results

We have a mixed Domino 6.5.4 / 7.0 environment and full-text indexes running on most of the replicas of names.nsf.
In both 6.5.4 and 7.0, when I run a full-text search against the Groups view on certain Domino servers, I get different results for the same search.
In other words, I get 133 results on one server, 63 results on another, and only 3 on the particular server we're trying to troubleshoot.
I have tried deleting and recreating the index, as well as rebuilding it using updall, but still the same result.
Any ideas why the inconsistency across different server replicas?
0
nateberry
Asked:
nateberry
  • 5
  • 5
  • 4
1 Solution
 
Sjef BosmanGroupware ConsultantCommented:
Some questions in return...

First: what is correct, 133, 63 or 3?
Then: are all full-text indexes created the same way, i.e. with the same parameters, and by a person with Manager access?
Do all replicas contain the same info?
Windows or Linux?
Sorry for asking, but do you really do a full-text search, using the search-bar?
0
 
nateberryAuthor Commented:
sjef bosman, good questions.
From visual inspection 133 would be more accurate.
I don't actually know how the full-text indexes were created, i.e. parameters & access level (we are a large Domino infrastructure with different levels of Administrator). We (top administrators) have FULL access, but the local IT Admins have 'Administrator' access with delegated Editor / Author access (depending on Roles assigned).
I run the searches using the 'Search in View' bar.
Does this answer your questions?
Thanks,
0
 
Sjef BosmanGroupware ConsultantCommented:
Not all, but many ;-)

Can you re-create the index on a replica using the Notes client, i.e. open the Database Properties, the index-tab (5th?), then Delete Index and then Create Index? And then test again how many docs are found?
0
Industry Leaders: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

 
mbonaciCommented:
Also check whether you have the notes.ini variable:
 - FT_MAX_SEARCH_RESULTS (although I doubt that someone set it to 3) on those three servers
 - UPDATE_NO_FULLTEXT=0 (this would disable index updates)

The search settings ("Find word variants" and "Fuzzy search") can make this kind of difference.

The index settings Sjef is talking about can be crucial.
You did create index for each db replica, right? I'm asking because some people assume full-text indexes replicate with the db.
If you did not, you must create a full-text index for each database replica (it's usually done in New replica dialog, and the index settings are then equivalent).

Replication and FT Index explained:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/domhelp/v8r0/topic/com.ibm.help.domino.admin85.doc/H_SEARCH_INDEXES_OVERVIEW.html

See here for FT indexing settings:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/domhelp/v8r0/topic/com.ibm.notes85.help.doc/sch_index_options_r.html

Be aware that you need to have Designer access or higher to create AND TO UPDATE a full-text index, so check your access level in the ACL (maybe you just assumed you updated the indices)...
0
 
Sjef BosmanGroupware ConsultantCommented:
@Marko:

"We (top administrators) have FULL access..."
0
 
nateberryAuthor Commented:
sjef - woah, recreated index brings back 63 results (similar to other servers)...
Re-creating the index didn't work before for some reason!  This time I deleted as described, waited a while, then created via the same way, i.e. DB properties.
mbonaci - thanks for the tips; that's cool knowing about the Notes.ini settings.  It's weird; some servers have FT indexes on their names.nsf, others don't - I don't know how consistently these have been created (i.e. by which method).  It's useful to know RE Designer level access is what grants you create / maintain index rights.
AWESOME RESPONSES guys!  Just need to vet the results to validate as solution - BRB!
0
 
mbonaciCommented:
That's pretty annoying, every time the two of us set our sights on a problem, the problem vanishes :)
0
 
mbonaciCommented:
@Sjef,
lucky you, I can only wish.
We, the lowest-possible-level admins, have Depositor access to even our local address books :)
0
 
Sjef BosmanGroupware ConsultantCommented:
Depositor?? You must be joking... I absolutely abhor to be anything less than a Full Access Admin on any Domino server that I have to work with. Asking every 5 minutes for permission to this or to do that, while developing, is a serious PITA.

So, I have to confess, I know very little of the usual user problems a real admin knows all about. Am I glad!
0
 
mbonaciCommented:
:)
0
 
nateberryAuthor Commented:
Selected 'Good' as I had previously tried this very same solution. It was only the second attempt which rendered success and therefore kudos to the contributor.
0
 
Sjef BosmanGroupware ConsultantCommented:
Good? I'd say it's more than Excellent, for I managed to make you do again what you said you already did (which unfortunately didn't work), now didn't I? ;-))

No harm done, but for next time, please have a look at how to grade solutions:
http://www.experts-exchange.com/help.jsp#hs=29&hi=403

The grade shouldn't reflect your personal appreciation of the solution. If the answer is spot on, give an A. By the way, giving an A, B or C doesn't cost you more or less points, it's just a multiplication factor for the points the Expert receives.
0
 
mbonaciCommented:
I think that I should've also been awarded with the points, since I instructed you to check whether the Full text indexes were actually created on those replicas, and it turned out to be the very cause of your problem.

 > mbonaci - thanks for the tips; that's cool knowing about the Notes.ini settings.  
 > It's weird; some servers have FT indexes on their names.nsf, others don't - I don't know how consistently these have been created...

See this comment: #34925274

Here on EE, we say thanks by awarding points.

I second all that Sjef said.
0
 
nateberryAuthor Commented:
Sjef - thanks for the guidance, will keep in mind next time.
mbonaci - actually my response about some servers having FT indexes / others not was more a commentary on our infrastructure. The servers in question (that I was investigating) all had FT indexes and I had already covered this ground prior to EE.
0

Featured Post

Industry Leaders: We Want Your Opinion!

We value your feedback.

Take our survey and automatically be enter to win anyone of the following:
Yeti Cooler, Amazon eGift Card, and Movie eGift Card!

  • 5
  • 5
  • 4
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now