Solved

100 or 1000 on the access layer?

Posted on 2011-02-19
3
293 Views
Last Modified: 2012-05-11
I am in the planning phases of a network infrastructure upgrade.  We are about to replace our access layer switches which are all 10/100 to newer cisco kit.  All the new switch ports are 10/100/1000 capable.   I have about 300 connections in the access layer that are going to be used for workstation end user connections.  All of the end user workstation machines have gig capable nic cards.  My question is do I just leave all the ports to auto and allow the worksations to negotiate to a gig speed which will most likely be the result from an auto/switch, auto/user setting?  I know it will be less administration going with auto/auto scenario but what makes more sense from a capacity point of view.  Do my end users really need 1000 speed on the network?  and if they are all given this capability does this put the network in jeapordy by giving the users ability to saturate links, such as trunks to the core etc...???
What also makes more sense from a design point of view?

thanks
0
Comment
Question by:FREDARCE
3 Comments
 
LVL 79

Accepted Solution

by:
lrmoore earned 250 total points
Comment Utility
I recommend sticking with auto/auto.
Just because the NIC negotiates at 1000M doesn't mean that much is going to be used. These are still end-user workstations that won't be pulling down 10Gb video files for editing.. typically we see only 1% utilization or less on a Gigabit port to workstation, and maybe 2-3% utilization on a gigabit uplink to the core. A quick burst from a large download won't matter.
So, the switch, nor the uplinks, still won't be any more taxed than if all the workstations were at 100M
If they are doing heavy duty file transfers, like x-rays or video editing or other very large files, then you might consider 10G uplinks between closet and core. Else just double the uplinks with an etherchannel . . .
0
 
LVL 34

Assisted Solution

by:Istvan Kalmar
Istvan Kalmar earned 250 total points
Comment Utility
HI,

I advise to use autoneg for users, and set the ports uplink ports to 1000M full duplex...
You able to checj the errors:
sh int | inc CRC
0
 

Author Comment

by:FREDARCE
Comment Utility
thanks guys,

that's reassurring.
0

Featured Post

How to run any project with ease

Manage projects of all sizes how you want. Great for personal to-do lists, project milestones, team priorities and launch plans.
- Combine task lists, docs, spreadsheets, and chat in one
- View and edit from mobile/offline
- Cut down on emails

Join & Write a Comment

Suggested Solutions

Title # Comments Views Activity
Link Aggregation 2 31
Prevent DDOS attack 16 44
how to access my server 9 25
printer shows as offline while connected to vpn 13 34
This is an article about my experiences with remote access to my clients (so that I may serve them) and eventually to my home office system via Radmin Remote Control. I have been using remote access for over 10 years and have been improving my metho…
Microservice architecture adoption brings many advantages, but can add intricacy. Selecting the right orchestration tool is most important for business specific needs.
After creating this article (http://www.experts-exchange.com/articles/23699/Setup-Mikrotik-routers-with-OSPF.html), I decided to make a video (no audio) to show you how to configure the routers and run some trace routes and pings between the 7 sites…
Here's a very brief overview of the methods PRTG Network Monitor (https://www.paessler.com/prtg) offers for monitoring bandwidth, to help you decide which methods you´d like to investigate in more detail.  The methods are covered in more detail in o…

763 members asked questions and received personalized solutions in the past 7 days.

Join the community of 500,000 technology professionals and ask your questions.

Join & Ask a Question

Need Help in Real-Time?

Connect with top rated Experts

13 Experts available now in Live!

Get 1:1 Help Now