• Status: Solved
  • Priority: Medium
  • Security: Public
  • Views: 320
  • Last Modified:

Totalling Values

Given my two tables of SupplierNames and SupplierLevels (stripped down here for legibility) :

        SupplierNames
SupNo   SupName
1      Stevenson Supplies
2      Jolson Supplies
3      Bobbington Supplies
4      Juleen Supplies
5      Harington Supplies
6      Freed Supplies
7      Gillingham Supplies

       SupplierOrderHistory
SupOrders    SupNo
300           4
120           6
12           3
140           6
543           1
455           2
311           3
555           6
234           5

Need to see a list of Suppliers that do NOT have cumulative orders (i.e. the total of their SupOrders in SupplierOrderHistory) of at least 450 - need to include Gillingham Supplies (SupNo 7) in this list even though they haven't placed any orders yet.
SupNo on SupplierOrderHistory table matches SupNo on SupplierNames, and data is on SSQL 2005 database.

All assistance appreciated ....
0
raymurphy
Asked:
raymurphy
  • 3
  • 2
1 Solution
 
lozzamooreCommented:
Simplest way would be something like this:

SELECT sn.SupName, SUM(sh.SupOrders)
FROM SupplierNames sn
LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.SupplierOrderHistory sh ON sn.SupNo = sh.SupNo
GROUP BY sn.SupName
HAVING COALESCE(SUM(sh.SupOrders), 450)>=450
0
 
raymurphyAuthor Commented:
This looks fine, so I'll test in a few mins to confirm, but would just like to understand what the COALESCE part of the HAVING clause does in this particular case ?
0
 
lozzamooreCommented:
Sure,
The COALESCE function is very similar to ISNULL, only the former is ANSI compliant.
This converts the NULL returned for no SH records found (e.g. Gillingham Supplies) to some value specified. In this case, we convert to 450 so that it also matches the filter criteria.

Make sense?
Kind regards,
L

PS If ANSI compliance is not an issue, generally ISNULL is preferable from a performance point of view.
http://sqlserverperformance.idera.com/tsql-optimization/performance-coalesce-null/
0
 
raymurphyAuthor Commented:
That makes sense now I've read it over again, so thanks for an excellent solution and explanation - and it works fine as I've just tested it ....
0
 
lozzamooreCommented:
Great. Thanks.
0
Question has a verified solution.

Are you are experiencing a similar issue? Get a personalized answer when you ask a related question.

Have a better answer? Share it in a comment.

Join & Write a Comment

Featured Post

Introducing Cloud Class® training courses

Tech changes fast. You can learn faster. That’s why we’re bringing professional training courses to Experts Exchange. With a subscription, you can access all the Cloud Class® courses to expand your education, prep for certifications, and get top-notch instructions.

  • 3
  • 2
Tackle projects and never again get stuck behind a technical roadblock.
Join Now