Apple Power Mac hard drive config

Planning to buy a new PowerMac for intensive graphics (Adobe apps) and some video editing.  Looking for some recommendations for configuring storage...

I will be getting the Apple RAID card with the machine and maxing (4) the HDD's... or is it recommended to use a 3rd party RAID card?  Should the OS go on a single disk and setup an array (RAID 0 or 5) for the apps?  Should the whole thing be setup as RAID 10?  I am looking for the best performance but wouldnt be opposed to redundancy if I can get it without too much of a performance hit.  

Who is Participating?

[Webinar] Streamline your web hosting managementRegister Today

roylongConnect With a Mentor Commented:
my recommendation:
four disks
1st raid group = 1 disk (system)
2nd raid group = 3 disks striped single partition for data (raid 0)
This gives no redundancy so buy an external 2/3TB drive for backup
For best performance and assured warranty get the "Mac Pro" with the apple RAID card set to raid5.  The Mac Pro only has 4 drive bays so unless you want to invest in a fiber channel card and external array that is your best bet.  All apps on one volume

On the other hand if you would like to save some money, use 2 hard drives and raid0.  
Also, if you plan to buy a new computer OS X 10.4 is obsolete, they come with 10.6.  Powermac was the older PPC based computer, which is replaced by the Mac Pro.
Never miss a deadline with

The revolutionary project management tool is here!   Plan visually with a single glance and make sure your projects get done.

jcneil4Author Commented:
Sorry, Mac Pro is what I meant. (Im a PC and Windows Server admin) I am getting it brand new.  The question I guess is on how much better RAID 0 will perform vs RAID 5 or RAID 10 and should the OS be seperated on different volume...

Thanks for responding
KCarney81Connect With a Mentor Commented:
OS X likes everything to be on one volume.  

RAID5 will perform much better than RAID0

Not sure about RAID10
jcneil4Author Commented:
How can RAID 5 perform better than RAID 0??? That makes no sense!
I'd suggest getting the biggest SSD drive you can afford and using that for OS and working storage, use the rotating disk for long-term and backup.  Especially for larger files like image and video.

Unless you have used an SSD, you cannot imagine how fast it is (or that you would ever go back to rotating storage).  It's a game changer.
et01267Connect With a Mentor Commented:
Oh, and the Apple SSDs are not the best value.  Look at the Sandforce-based drives out there, like the ones from OWC or OCZ.
I should have elaborated;

Raid 0 = Fastest, performance increases with drive count
Raid 1 = Possible boost in speed for READ, no gain to possible loss (if noticeable) elsewhere
Raid 10 = Similar performance to its equivalent drive Raid 0 (ie 3 Drive Raid0=6 drive Raid 10)
Raid 5 = Between Raid 0 and single drive performance, goes up with drive count. processor intensive

"With these statements, it seems to me that on a price vs capacity+performance comparison, Raid 5 comes out as the winner, the only fault being the extra processing power required (on software raid at least) for parity information on writes. otherwise, for the price of a single extra drive, one can have a similar level of fault tolerance, 66% of the available capacity (this also increases as drive count goes up, 75% available in a 4 drive array etc.) and descent read/write performance as compared to a 2 drive Raid 1 array with only 50% available capacity. This also allows gamers to have their boost in performance and have redundancy to boot. With more and more software based controllers offering this as an option, why not?"
jcneil4Author Commented:
Thank you all, I will probably go with roylong's recommendation.
All Courses

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.