Replacing RAID controller without losing data

I have a faulty 3ware RAID controller that I need to replace.  I have a spare controller ready to use, it is the exact same model.  Is it possible for me to replace the faulty controller with the spare without losing data if i place the drives in the exact same position as they are in the faulty controller?

I have already created backups of my data.

All help appreciated.
LVL 1
paulms53Asked:
Who is Participating?

[Product update] Infrastructure Analysis Tool is now available with Business Accounts.Learn More

x
I wear a lot of hats...

"The solutions and answers provided on Experts Exchange have been extremely helpful to me over the last few years. I wear a lot of hats - Developer, Database Administrator, Help Desk, etc., so I know a lot of things but not a lot about one thing. Experts Exchange gives me answers from people who do know a lot about one thing, in a easy to use platform." -Todd S.

ks_adminCommented:
Short answer, yes.  The raid configuration is stored on the drives, but like you said, keep them in the same position just to be sure.

Also, although not techinically required, I always match up the firmware on the RAID controllers just to be sure.


ks_admin
0
DavidPresidentCommented:
Yes ...
1) first upgrade or downgrade the controller's firmware (and controller's BIOS) to match that of the card that died.  This is VITAL.  Not all versions of firmware/BIOS/drivers are either upward or downwards compatible.

2) Unless you are 100% sure that the RAID was in no way degraded or in stress in any way, then the prudent thing is to do a full IMAGE backup of all disks using another computer.  Easiest way to do this is get yourself a large 2-3TB SATA drive, and plug in the 3WARE RAID disks.  Boot to linux, and then use dd command to image each physical drive into a data file, then compress the file.  
Is this required?   No, but always a good idea.  There is a remote possibility that you already had a metadata / NVRAM mismatch on the faulty controller.

If this was a healthy controller, then this step would be overkill, but sorry, when you have a faulty controller, all bets are off.
0

Experts Exchange Solution brought to you by

Your issues matter to us.

Facing a tech roadblock? Get the help and guidance you need from experienced professionals who care. Ask your question anytime, anywhere, with no hassle.

Start your 7-day free trial
Rodney BarnhardtServer AdministratorCommented:
This has been successfully done by replacing the card. Read the final comment at the bottom:http://arstechnica.com/civis/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=1125616

There also seems to be a lot of complaints about this controller, so you may want to reconsider this controller. Here is an article written by the president of a hosting company that used these: http://www.mattheaton.com/?p=160

Plus, the link above has several people commenting on problems with these cards.

0
10 Tips to Protect Your Business from Ransomware

Did you know that ransomware is the most widespread, destructive malware in the world today? It accounts for 39% of all security breaches, with ransomware gangsters projected to make $11.5B in profits from online extortion by 2019.

paulms53Author Commented:
I will need to upgrade the firmware on the spare controller card.  I already have backup of all of my data. I will be performing this switch later this week after business hours and keep you posted.
0
DavidPresidentCommented:
Well, having a developers agreement with LSI/AMCC (In my day job I write RAID diags, appliance software, etc ...) I can comment in much more depth.  
1) The vast majority of "problems" that people have with these cards when using a parity-based RAID and desktop class drives.  If you don't have enterprise/server class disks and are running RAID5 or RAID6 then you are just asking for trouble due to the error recovery limitations.     RAID1/0/10 is safe on desktop disks.

It is profoundly rare that this family of controller is to blame. It is one of the better midrange controllers out there.   Also if you don't enable background scrubbing then you are just asking for data loss when you have a drive failure.

[Warning - getting on soapbox]
Personally if you are using desktop class disks and this controller, or any RAID controller with RAID5 or higher (and to some extent RAID10), then backup often.  Furthermore, if you have Intel Matrix, or LSI-branded, or HP SMARTArray, or Dell PERCs RAID controllers, then desktop drives aren't even supported, and I have a drawer full of t-shirts thanks to the people that don't read published specs and qualified disk lists who think that the only thing that differentiates 2 SATA disks of consequence is amount of RAM, Capacity, and RPMs.  
[Off of soapbox]
0
paulms53Author Commented:
these are RAID 10 configurations on this machine.  unfortunately, (bear in mind, i did not purchase these disks) the disks in use are desktop class.
0
paulms53Author Commented:
RAID controller went seamless.
0
It's more than this solution.Get answers and train to solve all your tech problems - anytime, anywhere.Try it for free Edge Out The Competitionfor your dream job with proven skills and certifications.Get started today Stand Outas the employee with proven skills.Start learning today for free Move Your Career Forwardwith certification training in the latest technologies.Start your trial today
Server Hardware

From novice to tech pro — start learning today.